This sort of misses the point. It has nothing to do with a presumption of innocence. It's that there are questions about quid pro quo for government services. But when someone leaves public life and they or their spouse no longer hold prominent government positions (Powell, Blair, Albright) they can do almost whatever they want and take money from almost anyone they can personally stomach and who passes their personal barometer. That's the point (and the good news for us).
On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 4:23 PM, Eric Schwerin <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
Alexander Snyder Mackler