8726 Delivered-To: hbiden@rosemontseneca.com Received: by 10.216.30.194 with SMTP id k44cs158748wea; Mon, 12 Apr 2010 15:03:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.220.123.146 with SMTP id p18mr2527311vcr.37.1271109807876; Mon, 12 Apr 2010 15:03:27 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mail.dcsc.gov (mail.dcsc.gov [67.208.160.105]) by mx.google.com with SMTP id 34si10386056vws.45.2010.04.12.15.03.26; Mon, 12 Apr 2010 15:03:27 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of John.Mott@dcsc.gov designates 67.208.160.105 as permitted sender) client-ip=67.208.160.105; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of John.Mott@dcsc.gov designates 67.208.160.105 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=John.Mott@dcsc.gov X-AuditID: ac10020a-a9f60bb000001ae8-be-4bc398ae4054 Received: from dcchq32.ad.dcsc.gov (dcchq32.ad.dcsc.gov [10.3.180.237]) by mail.dcsc.gov (Symantec Mail Security) with ESMTP id 65B9118B2 for ; Mon, 12 Apr 2010 18:03:26 -0400 (EDT) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01CADA8B.F9F35027" Subject: District Court Update Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2010 18:03:26 -0400 Message-ID: X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: District Court Update Thread-Index: Acrai/nnVkyr/D6gQFeuXxM9NzjbPQ== From: "Mott, John M." To: "Hunter Biden" X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAA== ------_=_NextPart_001_01CADA8B.F9F35027 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=us-ascii Hi Hunter, I don't know whether you have had a chance to talk with Ron yet, but it appears that the "lay of the land" may be slightly different than I had been led to believe previously. Keep in mind that nothing is explained to the candidates. I had thought that all 4 vacancies on the District Court were presently in play at the WH. It appears, however, that the three names for the 4th vacancy on the District Court have probably not yet been sent up from Congresswoman Norton to the WH. As mentioned, my name was among nine that went up for the first three vacancies on the Court. Although nothing has been announced, and I may never know, it looks like I probably came very close. I am optimistic that my name will go up to the WH again when the names are sent for the 4th slot. If they are very seriously considering me already, the timing could be good. As mentioned, I would be delighted to talk with Ron - in person or on the phone. I know that he is a busy guy, but I am confident that he would appreciate my background and experience. I am grateful for your support. Thank you. I hope that you and your family are well. We'll probably see you over at the Marcou's in the not-too-distant future. All the best, John This message (including any attachments) is intended only for the use of the= individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information t= hat is non-public, proprietary, privileged, confidential, and exempt from di= sclosure under applicable law or may constitute as attorney work product. If= you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any use, d= issemination, distribution, or copying of this communication is strictly pro= hibited. If you have received this communication in error, notify us immedia= tely by telephone and (i) destroy this message if a facsimile or (ii) delete= this message immediately if this is an electronic communication. Thank you. ------_=_NextPart_001_01CADA8B.F9F35027 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Content-Type: TEXT/HTML; charset=us-ascii

Hi Hunter,

 

I don’t know whether you have had a chance to talk with Ron yet, but it appears that the “lay of the land” may be slightly different than I had been led to believe previously.  Keep in= mind that nothing is explained to the candidates.  I had thought that all 4 vacancies on the District Court were presently in play at the WH.  It a= ppears, however, that the three names for the 4th vacancy on the District Court have probably not yet been sent up from Congresswoman Norton to the WH= .  As mentioned, my name was among nine that went up for the first three vacanc= ies on the Court.  Although nothing has been announced, and I may never kno= w, it looks like I probably came very close.  I am optimistic that my name wi= ll go up to the WH again when the names are sent for the 4th slot.  I= f they are very seriously considering me already, the timing could be good.  <= o:p>

 

As mentioned, I would be delighted to talk with Ron ̵= 1; in person or on the phone.  I know that he is a busy guy, but I am conf= ident that he would appreciate my background and experience.

 

I am grateful for your support.  Thank you.

 

I hope that you and your family are well.  We’= ll probably see you over at the Marcou’s in the not-too-distant future.

 

All the best,

 

John

This message (including any attachments) is intended only for the use of= the individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain informati= on that is non-public, proprietary, privileged, confidential, and exempt fro= m disclosure under applicable law or may constitute as attorney work product= . If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any us= e, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this communication is strictly= prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, notify us imm= ediately by telephone and (i) destroy this message if a facsimile or (ii) de= lete this message immediately if this is an electronic communication. Thank= you.

------_=_NextPart_001_01CADA8B.F9F35027-- conversation-id 113940 date-last-viewed 0 date-received 1271109807 flags 25803619329 remote-id 8697