EMAIL DETAILS
SUBJECT:
An Irish bail-out and a British nightmare - Stephens - FT
PRI: NORMAL
FROM:
M
mandrews@ips.edu
DATE:
2010-11-22 19:55:56
MSG_ID:
<17763B4B-7599-4869-93AF-C4B027801E64@ips.edu>
RECIPIENTS:
TO:
C
Curtis Hastings
<curt@ips.edu>
D
Devon Archer
<darcher@rosemontseneca.com>
E
Eric Schwerin
<eschwerin@rosemontseneca.com>
H
Hunter Biden
<hbiden@rosemontseneca.com>
CONTENT:
TEXT: YES |
HTML: YES
PROCESSED
Please read, I think the ramifications may be similar for US, if out right wing seeks deep cuts to soon. An Irish bail-out and a British nightmare By Philip Stephens Published: November 22 2010 19:45 | Last updated: November 22 2010 19:45 This is not the time to gloat. Heavily indebted Britain is borrowing another £7bn or so to lend to catastrophically indebted Ireland. Tory Eurosceptics are not sure whether to cheer or jeer – to savour the eurozone crisis or to berate David Cameron’s government for contributing to the Irish bail-out. As it happens, Ireland’s property-boom-turned-banking-bust had little to do with its membership of the single currency. Ireland is not Greece. The closer parallels are with Iceland and, dare one say it, Britain. Gordon Brown got precious few things right as prime minister, but his bank rescue package probably saved Britain from Ireland’s fate. EDITOR’S CHOICE Philip Stephens: A referendum lock on Britain’s ambition - Nov-15 More from Philip Stephens - Aug-23 Philip Stephens: Cameron keeps a rendezvous with reality - Nov-08 Philip Stephens: Obama speaks the truth about power - Oct-28 Philip Stephens: Spending cuts fail fairness test - Oct-11 Those who imagine the euro to be responsible for Europe’s ills are left to explain Britain’s financial mess or why, say, France has ended up with a much smaller fiscal deficit. As for Britain’s contribution to the Irish package, George Osborne was suitably dismissive of his critics. The chancellor – no fan of the euro – observed that a carping “we-told-you-so” approach scarcely amounts to an intelligent economic policy. The self-interest behind the British loan (those fulminating that the money would be better spent on schools and hospitals should note it is a loan) is self-evident. Britain is Ireland’s biggest creditor. Its banking system is heavily exposed to Ireland’s banks. So are its export industries: Ireland is a bigger market for British goods than the four Bric countries put together. This is before you get to less tangible things such as neighbourly solidarity and sustaining the political trust required to safeguard a fragile peace in Northern Ireland. I heard one Tory Eurosceptic declare that Britain’s duty was to help Ireland reclaim its sovereignty by forcing it out of the single currency. There is a contradiction in there somewhere. On the other hand, there is nothing like someone else’s misfortune to make people feel good about their own troubles. Listening to the sceptics was to imagine that Britain’s recovery is now plain sailing. If only that were so. Britain has just about sorted out its banks, but, as far as making inroads into the deficit is concerned, it is about where Ireland was a year ago. At first, the vigour with which Dublin wielded the spending axe won plaudits from bond markets. But the deflationary impact of the cuts has since seen the deficit widen. That is the fear haunting Britain as its own cuts bite into Whitehall budgets. The nervousness is apparent at the Bank of England, where the monetary policy committee has all but suspended its inflation target. The MPC could never admit as much, of course. But all the evidence says it has concluded that sustaining economic recovery counts for more than keeping prices down. We are not talking here about letting inflation rip. Rather, the MPC seems to have decided that it can live with rises in the consumer prices index of 3 per cent or so – a percentage point above the official target of 2 per cent. On the other hand, inflation as measured by the more widely recognised retail prices index looks firmly stuck above 4 per cent. And the Bank’s own forecasts suggest that the pace of price rises will accelerate in coming months. It will be 2012 before the official target comes back into full view. Mervyn King, the Bank governor, is one of the foremost fiscal hawks. He has promised Mr Osborne that the MPC stands ready to pump even more cheap money into the economy if the recovery falters as a result of the fiscal squeeze. With the base rate already 0.5 per cent that will be easier said than done. That said, the MPC has made an intelligent choice. Competitive austerity may be the current European fashion, but growth is the sine qua non of successful repair of the public finances. Governments cannot deflate their way back to budget balance – a proposition that Ireland’s latest austerity package may yet test to destruction. Rising inflation, though, carries its own costs. It cuts household incomes and redistributes from savers to borrowers. It has particularly harsh effects on those dependent on fixed incomes – the more so at a time of historically low interest rates. When British policymakers congratulate themselves for not swapping sterling for the euro what they really mean is that keeping the pound has given them the chance to devalue it. Sterling is now worth about 20 per cent less than it was three years ago. What the policymakers do not say is that they have simply chosen higher inflation over more direct ways of taking money from consumers. Inflation can also develop a mind of its own; a little can quickly become a lot if wages start to chase prices. A cursory glance at Britain’s postwar history tells you that the competitive advantages that flow from devaluation are fairly easily squandered. Britain needs buoyant export markets – starting with Ireland. The real nightmare for Mr Osborne is a combination of faltering growth and rising inflation. No, there is nothing yet for Britain to gloat about.
METADATA:
THREAD:
INDEX:
AdhhnZMfJNxFpx4tTOCsy4eICZBOEw==