EMAIL DETAILS
SUBJECT:
NEC Coalition
PRI: NORMAL
FROM:
M
mmuldoon@rosemontseneca.com
DATE:
2010-11-10 22:22:52
MSG_ID:
<AANLkTimcJhA_aeRhSFna4U_DrJRSGrdEXmFr9wVsv==C@mail.gmail.com>
RECIPIENTS:
TO:
E
Eric Schwerin
<eschwerin@rosemontseneca.com>
H
Hunter Biden
<hbiden@rosemontseneca.com>
CONTENT:
TEXT: YES |
HTML: YES
PROCESSED
Hey guys, a few thoughts below after reviewing the materials HNTB sent over on the CA Industry coalition. We should discuss early next week and get back to them. 1) From an organizational/filing point of view I dont see any reason we couldnt just adopt the model used in CA. Makes the initial start up and filing process MUCH easier. 2) The outside woman they hired, Jo Linda Thompson, does purely legislative work. Clearly that wouldnt be our main role in the NE. We'd therefore have to work out a structure where we acted as the glue keeping together a multi-state legislative/PR process. Would we do administrative tasks as well? 3) Assuming all of the members paid the max membership fee (which more than likely ISNT the case), the Coalition had a budget of $280k last year. Not sure we could drive the type of program we would want on that budget. 4) Timing right? Want to ensure we have a strategy that follows a realistic timeline. 5) CAF / HNTB conflict. Ensure our position at the healm isnt seen as a conflict to other members. Bottom line is I think we could do a great job leading such a group, am just not sure it will make sense financially. -- Mike Muldoon Rosemont Seneca Partners, LLC 1010 Wisconsin Ave., NW Suite 705 Washington, DC 20007 (202) 333-1880 mmuldoon@rosemontseneca.co
METADATA:
THREAD:
INDEX:
AdhhnaTFKnlQ58vrQ/O5hUTZB3uS8Q==