EMAIL DETAILS
SUBJECT:
Fwd: Portal Bridge Issues continue
PRI: NORMAL
FROM:
E
eschwerin@rosemontseneca.com
DATE:
2010-11-10 19:19:52
MSG_ID:
<F08C2789-D3C7-4586-A402-27F40451235A@rosemontseneca.com>
RECIPIENTS:
TO:
H
Hunter Biden
<hbiden@rosemontseneca.com>
CONTENT:
TEXT: YES |
HTML: YES
PROCESSED
Could you squeeze an HNTB call in between the play at 9am and your 2:30pm flight from BWI on Friday? Maybe 11 or 11:30am? Eric D. Schwerin Rosemont Seneca Partners, LLC 1010 Wisconsin Ave., NW Suite 705 Washington, DC 20007 (202) 333-1880 eschwerin@rosemontseneca.com P Consider the environment before printing this email. Begin forwarded message: From: Bob Cook <bcook@hntb.com> Date: November 10, 2010 1:49:09 PM EST To: 'Eric Schwerin' <eschwerin@rosemontseneca.com> Subject: RE: Portal Bridge Issues continue Monday and Tuesday are bad for my guys. What do you have on Friday? From: Eric Schwerin [mailto:eschwerin@rosemontseneca.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 10, 2010 10:57 AM To: Bob Cook Cc: Hunter Biden; Anne Marie Person; Michael Muldoon Subject: Re: Portal Bridge Issues continue Would 10:30am or 4pm work on Monday? 10:30 and 4pm also would work on Tuesday. If this is more time sensitive, there also may be some time on Friday, but need to check on the timing of a couple of things. Any of those times work? We can be as flexible as you need - just let us know. Eric D. Schwerin Rosemont Seneca Partners, LLC 1010 Wisconsin Ave., NW Suite 705 Washington, DC 20007 (202) 333-1880 eschwerin@rosemontseneca.com P Consider the environment before printing this email. On Nov 10, 2010, at 11:45 AM, Bob Cook wrote: Hunter: Can you give me some times that you’re available for a conference call with John Parola, Bob Sutton and me to discuss Amtrak and Portal Bridge? Thanks. From: John Parola Sent: Tuesday, November 09, 2010 5:17 PM To: Bob Sutton - BOS Cc: Bob Cook Subject: Portal Bridge Issues continue Portal Bridge North is a good project, stand alone project that will improve safety, capacity and reliability of the Northeast Corridor. Millions have been spent to date designing it. Amtrak wants the project to go forward. With all the talk of HSR and Amtrak’s vision, in is not acceptable for Amtrak or NJT to walk away from this project. As it is , even if the existing 100 year old movable Portal was a newer bridge, it still is only 2 tracks. Both the state of NJ , NJT and Amtrak will greatly benefit from a new three track or four track fixed bridge. Waiting for another tunnels project to happen in line with Amtrak’s vision is too far away. I was thinking that perhaps Hunter can help with the current mess with his Amtrak relationships. If possible we can get him on a call to brief him with all of the drama. If Amtrak would step up and say we need it, regardless of ARC this project would move forward and all options are preserved. In as much as the design money was already appropriated you would think this could get figured out without all of the politics. Thoughts? John J. Parola Sr. Vice President, Northeast Division HNTB Corporation 5 Penn Plaza Plaza, 6th Floor New York, NY 1001 Direct (212) 294-7536 or (215) 282-1120 Cell (267) 934-1566 Email:jparola@hntb.com www.hntb.com This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you are NOT the intended recipient or the person responsible for delivering the e-mail to the intended recipient, be advised that you have received this e-mail in error and that any use, dissemination, forwarding, printing or copying this e-mail is strictly prohibited.
METADATA:
THREAD:
INDEX:
Adhhnan5Toru8/KHRE+PjzBfMJQI0w==
REFERENCES:
REFS:
<EEB7EBB9FFBF8742BACADBF9960D04E425AF2CFB07@HNTBW904.hntb.org>