EMAIL DETAILS
SUBJECT:
Re: Law firm
PRI: NORMAL
FROM:
J
josh@beaubiden.com
DATE:
2015-05-01 14:43:35
MSG_ID:
<80D2F7DA-632B-4915-A76B-F1738E715B57@beaubiden.com>
RECIPIENTS:
TO:
T
Ted Kaufman
<tedkaufman@comcast.net>
CC:
E
Eric Schwerin
<eschwerin@rosemontseneca.com>
H
Hunter Biden
<hbiden@rosemontseneca.com>
S
smacklera@gmail.com
CONTENT:
TEXT: YES |
HTML: YES
PROCESSED
yeah, this is what I suggested Stuart say: We’re really excited for Beau to grow his work in the Whistle Blower group. It’s a natural continuation of what he did as AG, and is something he’s already been working on since he joined the firm in January. It doesn’t change anything for him politically - I think he’d make an excellent Governor. Joshua Alcorn 302/295.8340 (office) 302/598.1885 (cell) josh@beaubiden.com > On May 1, 2015, at 10:42 AM, tedkaufman@comcast.net wrote: > > I assume Stuart knows to say - "nothing has changed" > > Sent from Xfinity Connect Mobile App > > ------ Original Message ------ > > From: Alex Snyder-Mackler > To: Ted Kaufman > Cc: Josh Alcorn, Hunter Biden, Eric Schwerin > Sent: May 1, 2015 at 3:34 PM > Subject: Re: Law firm > Agreed, with the caveat that Stuart knows what to say re potential campaign. If you guys are confident then so am I. > > ASM > > On May 1, 2015, at 10:23 AM, tedkaufman@comcast.net <mailto:tedkaufman@comcast.net> wrote: > > I would go with response 1. Let Stuart deal with him. > > Sent from Xfinity Connect Mobile App > > ------ Original Message ------ > > From: Josh Alcorn > To: Alex Snyder-Mackler, Hunter Biden, Eric Schwerin, Ted Kaufman > Sent: May 1, 2015 at 1:37 PM > Subject: Fwd: Law firm > And just as I send that previous email, here comes this to me. I see a few options: > 1. No response. Starkey’s article then says something about “no indication what this means for 2016, Biden campaign didn’t respond to inquiries.” > 2. I respond, "Jon, the expanded role in the Whistle Blower group doesn’t change anything.” And then ignore his follow up. > 3. I see if he’ll go on background and see if he’ll say, “a person close to the Biden campaign says…” and make the case that this is perfectly in line with what Beau did as AG, continuation of the work, etc. > > I like option two the best. I’m comfortable with option three, but don’t think I’m the best person to do it (Stuart would be, or maybe Bart). Option one is by far the easiest, but I like where we’re at now, and feeding the rumor mill by not responding may only put more pressure on us. A fourth option may be an amalgam of two and three. > > Thoughts? > > Joshua Alcorn > 302/295.8340 (office) > 302/598.1885 (cell) > josh@beaubiden.com <mailto:josh@beaubiden.com> > > > > > Begin forwarded message: > > From: "Starkey, Jonathan" <jstarkey@wilmingt.gannett.com <mailto:jstarkey@wilmingt.gannett.com>> > To: Joshua Alcorn <josh@beaubiden.com <mailto:josh@beaubiden.com>> > Subject: Law firm > Date: May 1, 2015 at 8:02:17 AM EDT > > Hey Josh, > I'm writing something quick about Beau expanding his role at G&E. Is he still planning to run for gov? > Hope all's well, > Jon > > Jonathan Starkey > The News Journal > Cell: (302) 983-6756 >
METADATA:
THREAD:
INDEX:
Adhhne743wNMX8JbRvmQryff2ekioA==
REFERENCES:
REPLY_TO:
<2028459181.290420.1430491321427.JavaMail.zimbra@comcast.net>
REFS:
<0C94B0F7-8B53-4AB1-99DA-92EF24BFA00B@gmail.com>
<AC9C4426-7C2A-470A-B97B-495498E38483@beaubiden.com>
<F7FB6CF1-566A-4028-929D-2154B54C6DB2@wilmingt.gannett.com>
<1941102540.273281.1430490213524.JavaMail.zimbra@comcast.net>
<2028459181.290420.1430491321427.JavaMail.zimbra@comcast.net>