EMAIL DETAILS
SUBJECT:
Competitor sample contract
PRI: NORMAL
FROM:
N
ncallahan@rosemontseneca.com
DATE:
2010-09-14 15:28:01
MSG_ID:
<00d701cb5421$6d456730$47d03590$@com>
RECIPIENTS:
TO:
C
'Chris Heinz'
<cheinz@rosemontseneca.com>
C
'Curt Hastings'
<curt@ips.edu>
D
'Devon Archer'
<darcher@rosemontseneca.com>
E
'Eric Schwerin'
<eschwerin@rosemontseneca.com>
H
'Hunter Biden'
<hbiden@rosemontseneca.com>
M
'Michael Andrews'
<mandrews@ips.edu>
R
'Rob Mitchell'
<robert.mitchell2@att.net>
R
ronnie@ips.edu
T
tab@ips.edu
CONTENT:
TEXT: YES |
HTML: YES
PROCESSED
Hi team: Attached is an actual live competitor contract. Take a look. Their approach is a "wide & shallow" one and they are asking for short money - similar to a software company: their goal is to keep you mildly dissatisfied - and because it's not a lot of money a year and someone gets some value out of it somewhere in your company - you renew your subscription each year. To model out Eurasia and assume that this contract represents an "average" client: - $72k annual revenue = 1 client - $5m annual revenue = 70 clients - $100m annual revenues = 1,400 clients Their model assumes having scores of "analysts" on staff and/or on contract to meet the needs of potentially 1,000 or so clients. And a commercial content delivery product/technology that is easy to build, but a lot of work to maintain and support clients (i.e., I forgot my password, I can't find my report, etc.) So a fairly robust operation is needed to support such a "retail" offering. Not a bad business, but one with many moving parts and lot's and lot's of client service. Best, Neil ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------- Neil Callahan Rosemont Seneca 401 Greenwich Street, Suite 400 | New York NY 10013 | 212-933-9965 | 212-796-4037 1010 Wisconsin Avenue, Suite 705 | Washington DC 20007 | 202-333-1880 917-945-9516 (mobile) 866-749-8879 (fax)
METADATA:
THREAD:
INDEX:
ActUIWsatXw/DuoNR7+/bLQDZlhbeQ==