EMAIL DETAILS
SUBJECT:
Re: Ambinder: Will Republicans Nominate an Unelectable Candidate in Delaware?
PRI: NORMAL
FROM:
S
smacklera@gmail.com
DATE:
2010-09-13 21:46:10
MSG_ID:
<AANLkTiniwAm+FN6g_rxC5w0KwJhytqgyz3h53_ZmXxrs@mail.gmail.com>
RECIPIENTS:
TO:
E
Eric Schwerin
<eschwerin@rosemontseneca.com>
CC:
2
Biden Beau
<261penn@gmail.com>
H
Hunter Biden
<hbiden@rosemontseneca.com>
CONTENT:
TEXT: YES |
HTML: YES
PROCESSED
to put it politely: the Rs in DE are shitting themselves. apparently the whole (political) state is obsessed today. On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 4:43 PM, Eric Schwerin <eschwerin@rosemontseneca.com > wrote: > Will Republicans Nominate an Unelectable Candidate in Delaware?<http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2010/09/will-republicans-nominate-an-unelectable-candidate-in-delaware/62862/> > POLITICS <http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/> SEP 13 2010, 11:24 AM ET Comments > (13)<http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2010/09/will-republicans-nominate-an-unelectable-candidate-in-delaware/62862/#disqus_thread> > Tomorrow marks the end of a particularly brutal primary season for Senate > Republicans, and another upset is in the making: a Public Policy Poll > released this weekend shows insurgent Christine O'Donnell tied within the > margin of error with party-backed Rep. Mike Castle. O'Donnell was recently > endorsed by Sarah Palin, who made an issue out of "establishment attacks" on > O'Donnell. > > Many of those attacks, though, are in the form of panicky warnings from the > Professional Right, quite apart from the party, which views O'Donnell as a > disaster of a candidate, someone who could prevent Republicans from picking > up a Senate seat that would have easily, otherwise, been theirs. Matt Lewis, > Patrick Ruffini, John McCormack, and others have ruminated to this effect. > The state Republican Party chairman said that O'Donnell was unworthy of > being elected <http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5jjVT7jSr0fJKHujjr5KMJ9wzFPuwD9I3A2N80>"dog > catcher." The Weekly Standard's John McCormack posted <http://www.weeklystandard.com/blogs/citing-mental-anguish-christine-odonnell-sought-69-million-gender-discrimination-lawsuit-again>a > tough investigative piece that calls O'Donnell's motives into question. > > Predictably, the harsher Republicans have resisted O'Donnell, the more > excited the Tea Party Express has become about her candidacy. This is not > simply a case of insurgents versus the party, however: the NRA endorsed > O'Donnell too, and many of her opponents have supported plenty of the > insurgent candidates who defeated NRSC-hand-picked candidates in other > Senate races. (I don't think a single one of O'Donnell's professional GOP > critics, aside from the NRSC, would oppose Ovide Lamontagne winning in New > Hampshire on Tuesday.) > > Mike Castle can still win this primary, because about 30,000 people are > going to vote. But the Tea Party Express, and Sarah Palin's robo-calls, have > turned out plenty more than 30,000 voters before. > > If O'Donnell wins, Democrats believe that, with the right injection of > money and enough targeted GOTV, Chris Coons, the Democrat who ran instead of > Attorney General Beau Biden, can win the seat. > > > Eric D. Schwerin > Rosemont Seneca Partners, LLC > 1010 Wisconsin Ave., NW > Suite 705 > Washington, DC 20007 > (202) 333-1880 > eschwerin@rosemontseneca.com > *P** **Consider the environment before printing this email.* > > -- Alexander Snyder-Mackler (302) 598-867
METADATA:
THREAD:
INDEX:
AdhhnfksTvhlMgKtQFS7B9fs0xuUbA==
REFERENCES:
REPLY_TO:
<B824B437-9D27-4203-9BBB-724454D11496@rosemontseneca.com>
REFS:
<B824B437-9D27-4203-9BBB-724454D11496@rosemontseneca.com>