EMAIL DETAILS
SUBJECT:
RE: RSP Planning Scenarios - draft
PRI: NORMAL
FROM:
N
ncallahan@rosemontseneca.com
DATE:
2010-09-09 23:02:42
MSG_ID:
<008d01cb5073$1c8a7c10$559f7430$@com>
RECIPIENTS:
TO:
D
'Devon Archer'
<darcher@rosemontseneca.com>
E
'Eric Schwerin'
<eschwerin@rosemontseneca.com>
H
'Hunter Biden'
<hbiden@rosemontseneca.com>
N
'Neil Callahan'
<ncallahan@rosemontseneca.com>
CONTENT:
TEXT: YES |
HTML: YES
PROCESSED
One additional point of reference - most investment banks pay 50% of net income in bonus and 50% goes to Shareholders/Partners. And most Operating Partners double dip - they get a bonus from their Line of Business and they get their distribution as a partner of the 50% of net income going to the shareholder/partners. So 50% is up to how you grow your own unit and 50% is how you help your peers grow their units. That's why Admin Partners (like Paulson at Goldman) made less money than the Business Leads even though he was the CEO of the company - he was not running a Line of Business. That's why most Admin Partners move into that role once they've made a ton of money - like Blankfein who made his money as a Gold Trader at Goldman before becoming a pencil pushing CEO. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------- Neil Callahan Rosemont Seneca 401 Greenwich Street, Suite 400 | New York NY 10013 | 212-933-9965 | 212-796-4037 1010 Wisconsin Avenue, Suite 705 | Washington DC 20007 | 202-333-1880 917-945-9516 (mobile) 866-749-8879 (fax) From: Neil Callahan [mailto:ncallahan@rosemontseneca.com] Sent: Thursday, September 09, 2010 6:54 PM To: 'Devon Archer'; 'Hunter Biden'; 'Eric Schwerin' Subject: RSP Planning Scenarios - draft Hey guys, I did some model tinkering based on our call yesterday and how we can look at the business as "Lines of Business" and perhaps to start to move in that direction in terms of operations, focus, teams, etc. Take a look at the model scenarios: 1 Current State (estimated), 2 Core Build Out - next 12 months and 3 Core Build Out plus Analytics - next 12 months+ . All of the Gross and Net percentages are where each of those lines of business should be in terms of industry benchmarks. . The "Cost of Service" is essentially the headcount, COGS, contractors, whatever the "delivery" costs are include % of time of people (i.e., the Corporate Advisory pays for 20% of Neil's base because he spends 20% of his time delivering on that business) . All travel etc are all pass through to client and have already been netted out (we have Net Revenue, not Gross Revenue). . Each LOB is hit with a 12% charge to cover Overhead - sales, office space, mail, computers - and headcount doing admin (i.e., 10% of Devon's bases in charged to overhead for his time spent selling, or doing the taxes, etc.) . This basically leave Net Income for each LOB , or "contribution margin" meaning how much has each LOB contributed to the business. . Then I leave a bonus pool that gets filled once the contribution margin target is filled and this pool is distributed to the LOB Management. (say 20%, it could go higher, or be different by LOB) . After that is Net Income for distribution to shareholders and/or additional bonus pool and/or corporate initiatives and investments. I know this is a lot for an email, but it's a straight forward model once you take a look. Let me know if you all want to get on the phone and review. Best, Neil ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------- Neil Callahan Rosemont Seneca 401 Greenwich Street, Suite 400 | New York NY 10013 | 212-933-9965 | 212-796-4037 1010 Wisconsin Avenue, Suite 705 | Washington DC 20007 | 202-333-1880 917-945-9516 (mobile) 866-749-8879 (fax)
METADATA:
THREAD:
INDEX:
ActQceWCYmbSIb6vRaWNFQg0Fg1ZYQAAFgRQ