EMAIL DETAILS
SUBJECT:
FW: Office of Vice President Biden Intelligence Briefing for Wednesday, April 18, 2018
PRI: NORMAL
FROM:
K
kchung@vpbiden.org
DATE:
2018-04-18 13:39:55
MSG_ID:
<7293ba14315d08daece43f40ee416011@mail.gmail.com>
RECIPIENTS:
TO:
H
Valerie Biden Owens
<hurricane5155@gmail.com>
J
Jimmy Biden
<jbiden@lionhallgp.com>
J
Jill Tracy Biden
<jill.tracy2@gmail.com>
R
Hunter Biden
<rhbdc@icloud.com>
T
Ashley Blazer Biden
<trailblazerbiden@gmail.com>
CONTENT:
TEXT: YES |
HTML: YES
PROCESSED
Office of Vice President Biden Intelligence Briefing *From:* Bulletin Intelligence <Biden@BulletinIntelligence.com> *Sent:* Wednesday, April 18, 2018 7:56 AM *To:* Biden@BulletinIntelligence.com *Subject:* Office of Vice President Biden Intelligence Briefing for Wednesday, April 18, 2018 *Click to access <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018041801biden&r=email-13ef&l=000-faf&t=c> mobile-optimized online version, including download options and an audio reader.* [image: Image removed by sender. Office of Vice President Biden Intelligence Briefing] <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018041801biden&r=email-13ef&l=001-04c&t=c> *To: Vice President Joe Biden* *Wednesday, April 18, 2018 8:00 AM EDT* Today's Table of Contents *Leading the News <#SECTION_1>* • McConnell Will Not Bring Bill To Protect Mueller To Senate Floor. <#S1> *Foreign Policy <#SECTION_2>* • Pompeo Met With Kim; Trump Says US, North Korea Talking At “Extremely High Levels.” <#S2> • Kudlow Apologizes For Saying Haley Got “Ahead Of The Curve” On Russian Sanctions. <#S3> • Mattis Urged Trump To Seek Congressional Approval For Syria Airstrikes. <#S4> • Senate Panel Asks “Tough Questions” On US Support For Conflict In Yemen. <#S5> • US Wants To Transfer US-Born ISIS Suspect From Iraq To Another Country. <#S6> • Kudlow Downplays Possibility Of US Rejoining TPP. <#S7> • Nielsen Warns Of “Unintended Consequences” Of New European Data Privacy Law. <#S8> *Domestic Policy <#SECTION_3>* • Gorsuch Joins Supreme Court Liberals To Strike Down Part Of Immigration Law. <#S9> • Trump Blasts Brown Over National Guard Troops On California-Mexico Border. <#S10> • McConnell Considering Vote To Make Tax Cuts Permanent. <#S11> • Mnuchin: Tax Filers Affected By IRS Website Malfunction Will Get Extra Time. <#S12> • Homebuilders Group Paid For Pruitt’s Hotel Stay In Colorado. <#S13> • Sessions Proposes Stricter Opioid Regulations. <#S14> • Starbucks To Close More Than 8,000 Stores On One Day For Racial Bias Training. <#S15> *Cancer Research <#SECTION_4>* • Biotech Firm’s Blood Test Could Offer New Method For Detecting Early Cancers. <#S16> • Study: Certain Blood Pressure Medications May Increase Pancreatic Cancer Risk. <#S17> *Editorials/Op-Eds <#SECTION_5>* • New York Times. <#S18> • Washington Post. <#S19> *Biden in the News <#SECTION_6>* • Gasparino: Biden “Continues” To Talk With Wall Street Executives About Possible Run. <#S20> • Sharpton: Biden “Would Be A Formidable Candidate” In 2020. <#S21> • Dailey Lewis Touts Beau Biden Foundation Efforts To Prevent Child Abuse. <#S22> • Reviewer Hails Biden’s New Book As “Fascinating And Truly Moving.” <#S23> • The Hill Highlights New Additions To Biden Foundation Board Of Directors. <#S24> • Boston Globe Highlights 2018 Common Wealth Award Winners. <#S25> • Biden Lauds Barbara Bush. <#S26> • Biden Featured On Episode Of “Poetry In America.” <#S27> Leading the News McConnell Will Not Bring Bill To Protect Mueller To Senate Floor. The AP <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018041801biden&r=email-13ef&l=002-440&t=c> (4/17) reports in a brief item that Senate Majority Leader McConnell said that he “won’t be holding a vote on legislation to protect special counsel Robert Mueller from being fired by President Donald Trump, essentially killing the bipartisan bill.” McConnell said on Fox News’ Your World[image: Image removed by sender. Video] <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018041801biden&r=email-13ef&l=003-4cb&t=c> that the legislation is “not necessary. There is no indication that Mueller is going to be fired. I don’t think the President is going to do that. And just as a practical matter, even if we passed it, why would he sign it?” The Hill <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018041801biden&r=email-13ef&l=004-300&t=c> (4/17, Carney) also covers McConnell’s comments. Politico <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018041801biden&r=email-13ef&l=005-ae3&t=c> (4/17, Cheney) reported that “a handful of House Republicans have endorsed” a House version of legislation to protect “from any attempt by [Trump] to remove him, even as GOP leaders insist that such legislation is unnecessary.” So far, Reps. Ryan Costello (R), Charlie Dent (R), Brian Fitzpatrick (R), Walter Jones (R), and Ileana Ros-Lehtinen (R) have signed on. Rep. Eric Swalwell (D) said on CNN’s Situation Room[image: Image removed by sender. Video] <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018041801biden&r=email-13ef&l=006-d72&t=c> (4/17), “We have bipartisan legislation in both chambers, the House and Senate, where we could protect Mueller and make sure he and [Deputy Attorney General Rod] Rosenstein are not fired unless there was cause.” Rep. Mark DeSaulnier (D) tweeted <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018041801biden&r=email-13ef&l=007-439&t=c>, “[McConnell] refuses to take up legislation to limit the President’s ability to fire the Special Counsel, continuing to put party over protecting the rule of law.” Rep. Jared Huffman (D) tweeted <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018041801biden&r=email-13ef&l=008-5d7&t=c>, “I’d be hard pressed to think of anyone in recent history who has sucked out more of the soul of American democracy than Mitch McConnell.” *Trump Reportedly Less Interested In Meeting With Mueller After Cohen Raids. *The Washington Post <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018041801biden&r=email-13ef&l=009-1d3&t=c> (4/17, Leonnig, Parker, Dawsey) reports that the FBI raids on Michael Cohen’s office, home, and hotel room last week “deeply rattled the president – souring him on his long-stated preference to sit down for an interview” with Mueller “and prompting him to renew efforts to hire more legal firepower, people familiar with the discussions said.” According to “two people familiar with the president’s frustration,” Trump “was infuriated by the seizure of possibly sensitive correspondence involving work that Cohen...was doing on his behalf and believed Mueller’s team was operating in bad faith.” Ex-FBI Director James Comey, asked on ABC’s Good Morning America[image: Image removed by sender. Video] <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018041801biden&r=email-13ef&l=00a-a36&t=c> (4/17) about Trump’s claim that the FBI “broke into” Cohen’s office, said, “It shows me he either doesn’t know or doesn’t care what the rule of law looks like. Nobody broke into anybody’s office. It doesn’t happen. The FBI gets a search warrant from a federal judge and conducts itself professionally, completely and politely by the accounts of the people involved. So it’s a total distortion of the way things work.” *Marist Poll: Unfavorable Views Of Mueller Increasing. *The Washington Times <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018041801biden&r=email-13ef&l=00b-a47&t=c> (4/17, Persons) reports that a Marist poll shows attitudes towards Mueller “changing in a negative direction.” Thirty percent of respondents “now say they have an unfavorable view of Mr. Mueller, up 10 points from 20 percent at the end of March. Little has changed on the favorable side, with 32 percent saying they have a positive view of him compared to 33 percent in March.” *ACLU Attorney Says Neutral Party Should Review Cohen Documents. *The Washington Examiner <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018041801biden&r=email-13ef&l=00c-c80&t=c> (4/17, Cohen) reports that ACLU lawyer Brett Max Kaufman “sided with” Cohen on Tuesday, writing in a blog post <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018041801biden&r=email-13ef&l=00d-702&t=c> that US District Judge Kimba Wood “should allow a neutral party to review the documents the FBI seized from Cohen’s office.” Meanwhile, legal analyst Dan Abrams said on ABC World News Tonight[image: Image removed by sender. Video] <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018041801biden&r=email-13ef&l=00e-4c8&t=c> (4/17, story 4, 1:10, Muir), “The President and Michael Cohen lost in their effort to be the initial ones to go in and determine what’s privileged and what’s not. But now prosecutors go in, they do some administrative work, they put it on a searchable database. Both sides are going to have access to it. And the only remaining question is, who should make the first decisions? Should it be federal prosecutors or an independent individual? But regardless, the defense is going to have a continuing say in this battle.” *Cohen’s Father-In-Law Has Loaned Millions To Chicago Taxi Magnate Named In Warrant. *The Chicago Sun-Times <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018041801biden&r=email-13ef&l=00f-1eb&t=c> (4/17, Novak) reports that the ties between Cohen “and Chicago’s taxicab industry go deeper than previously known. Over the past eight months, Cohen’s father-in-law has given at least $20 million in loans to Yasya Shtayner,” whose family “owns Chicago Medallion Management Corp., which manages 368 taxicabs, including 22 owned by Cohen.” Shtayner and her husband Semyon Shtayner “were identified in a warrant the FBI used to raid Cohen’s law office and home.” *Dershowitz: Trump “Has Much More To Worry About” In Cohen Probe Than In Mueller Inquiry. *Breitbart <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018041801biden&r=email-13ef&l=010-048&t=c> (4/17, Kraychik) reports that in an interview with Breitbart News Tonight, Alan Dershowitz told Breitbart News Tonight, “About two months ago, I said and wrote that Trump doesn’t have anything to worry about, particularly on the Mueller investigation. ... I always thought that the...investigation of his business and his private life would be raising more questions, much like it did with President Clinton: Whitewater and then Paula Jones and then, ultimately, to the blue dress. I do think he has much more to worry about [with] his private lawyer.” Former Attorney General Michael Mukasey writes in the Wall Street Journal <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018041801biden&r=email-13ef&l=011-2a5&t=c> (4/17) that while attorney-client privilege does have limits, it is not clear that they have been met in the Cohen case. *Fox News Says Hannity “Continues To Have Our Full Support.” *The Los Angeles Times <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018041801biden&r=email-13ef&l=012-745&t=c> (4/17, Battaglio) reports that Fox News offered support for Sean Hannity on Tuesday after it was revealed “that he is a client of President Trump’s personal attorney Michael Cohen, a relationship never made known to viewers of his nightly program or his bosses.” In a statement, Fox News said, “While Fox News was unaware of Sean Hannity’s informal relationship with Michael Cohen and was surprised by the announcement in court yesterday, we have reviewed the matter and spoken to Sean and he continues to have our full support.” Politico <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018041801biden&r=email-13ef&l=013-d33&t=c> (4/17, Lima) reports that the “is testing the Fox News host’s track record of skating through controversies, though the network is so far publicly supporting him.” Hannity said on Fox News’ Hannity[image: Image removed by sender. Video] <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018041801biden&r=email-13ef&l=014-b7e&t=c> (4/17) that the “fake news media” has “a new obsession, and a new target to feign their moral outrage at, and they have decided to hyperventilate and go wall-to-wall with hysterical coverage about me. Now the media in this country has zero credibility. ... They are frauds. They are partisan hacks and frankly, nothing more than extension of the Democratic Party.” ABC World News Tonight[image: Image removed by sender. Video] <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018041801biden&r=email-13ef&l=015-c0b&t=c> (4/17, story 3, 1:55, Muir) and the CBS Evening News[image: Image removed by sender. Video] <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018041801biden&r=email-13ef&l=016-193&t=c> (4/17, story 6, 0:40, Glor) both covered comments Hannity made on his Monday night show, as well as Fox’s statement of support. *Daniels Says She Is “Done Being Bullied.” *ABC World News Tonight[image: Image removed by sender. Video] <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018041801biden&r=email-13ef&l=017-02f&t=c> (4/17, story 2, 2:00, Muir) reported that Stormy Daniels appeared on ABC’s The View on Tuesday, where she said, “I’m tired of being threatened and intimidating me and trying to say that you’ll ruin my life and take my, you know, all my money and my house and whatever, I’m sorry, I’m done. I’m done being bullied.” ABC’s Kyra Phillips: “Daniels has said she would give all the money back, and that President Trump never even signed the agreement to silence her.” The CBS Evening News[image: Image removed by sender. Video] <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018041801biden&r=email-13ef&l=018-c11&t=c> (4/17, story 5, 1:10, Glor) reported that Daniels and her attorney are also offering a $100,000 “reward for a mystery man she says warned her to keep quiet.” USA Today <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018041801biden&r=email-13ef&l=019-af2&t=c> (4/17, Schouten) reports that Daniels “has said the unidentified man threatened her in 2011, a few weeks after she agreed to tell the story of her alleged tryst to In Touch Weekly magazine.” The Washington Times <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018041801biden&r=email-13ef&l=01a-332&t=c> (4/17, Morton) reports that Daniels said in another interview that if she wins her defamation lawsuit against Cohen, she will donate $130,000 to Planned Parenthood “in Mr. Cohen’s and President Trump’s names.” *In Tweet Today, Trump Calls Daniels Sketch “Total Con Job,” Slams “Fake News Media.” *Trump tweeted <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018041801biden&r=email-13ef&l=01b-161&t=c> this morning, “A sketch years later about a nonexistent man. A total con job, playing the Fake News Media for Fools (but they know it)!” The tweet included a retweet <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018041801biden&r=email-13ef&l=01c-1bc&t=c> comparing the sketch Daniels presented with a photo of Daniels’ purported former partner. *Cohen Case Judge Officiated Soros’ Wedding. *The Washington Times <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018041801biden&r=email-13ef&l=01d-121&t=c> (4/17, Mordock) reports that Wood, who is overseeing the case against Cohen, “officiated the 2013 wedding of George Soros, a billionaire supporter of liberal political causes.” *Comey Says It Is “Not Okay” For Trump To Call For Imprisonment Of Critics. *Ex-FBI Director James Comey, asked on ABC’s Good Morning America[image: Image removed by sender. Video] <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018041801biden&r=email-13ef&l=01e-9f9&t=c> (4/17) about President Trump’s claim that he should be jailed for leaking classified information and lying to Congress, said, “That is not normal. That is not okay. First of all, he’s just making stuff up, but most importantly the President of the United States is calling for the imprisonment of a private citizen as he’s done for a whole lot of people who criticize him. That is not acceptable in this country.” Comey similarly said on CBS’ Late Show[image: Image removed by sender. Video] <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018041801biden&r=email-13ef&l=01f-812&t=c> (4/17, Colbert), “It’s not okay for the President of the United States to say a private citizen should be in jail. It’s not normal. It’s not acceptable. It’s not okay. But it’s happened so much, there’s a danger we’re now numb to it, and the norm has been destroyed.” Comey was also asked on ABC’s Good Morning America[image: Image removed by sender. Video] <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018041801biden&r=email-13ef&l=020-3cc&t=c> (4/17) if he has any regrets about his book given the criticism of his discussion of personal details about Trump – “his hair, his hand size, speculation about the tanning goggles.” Comey said, “No. ... I’m trying to be an author and bring the readers with me into a room, and so I describe all kinds of people in great detail. ... I’m not trying to make fun of President Trump.” *Comey: Trump’s Leadership Style “Strikingly Similar” To That Of Mob Boss. *Comey, asked on CBS’ Late Show[image: Image removed by sender. Video] <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018041801biden&r=email-13ef&l=021-e97&t=c> (4/17, Colbert) about his comparison of Trump to a mob boss, said, “The leadership style is actually strikingly similar. ... And I don’t mean it in the sense that Donald Trump is out breaking legs or shaking down shopkeepers. I mean it in the sense when he leads, it’s all about the boss – What will serve the boss best? How are you helping the boss? It is all about that person and nothing external to that, and that reminds me very much of the Cosa Nostra leadership.” *Nunes Says Russians “Could Have Information On Comey” Or “All Kinds Of People.” *The Washington Examiner <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018041801biden&r=email-13ef&l=022-a6c&t=c> (4/17, Chaitin) reports that House Intelligence Chairman Devin Nunes “took a rhetorical jab at James Comey on Tuesday, responding to the former FBI director’s open-ended suggestion that it was ‘possible’ that the Russians have dirt on President Trump.” Nunes told Fox News, “Well, it’s certainly possible that the Russians could have information on Comey. It’s certainly possible that the Russians could have information on Hillary Clinton. It is certainly possible that they have information on all kinds of people.” Comey said on CBS’ Late Show[image: Image removed by sender. Video] <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018041801biden&r=email-13ef&l=023-956&t=c> (4/17, Colbert) that there are things he knows about the Russia investigation that have not been made public. Comey added, “They’re not in the book. I had to have my book reviewed by the FBI to make sure it didn’t include classified information or any sensitive investigative information, so it’s not in the book and I can’t talk about it.” *Many Clinton Supporters Have Not Forgiven Comey. *The Washington Post <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018041801biden&r=email-13ef&l=024-736&t=c> (4/17, Weigel) reports that many Hillary Clinton supporters “have not forgiven Comey for how he conducted the investigation of her use of a private email server during her tenure as secretary of state, which they say cost her the 2016 presidential election.” Rep. Jerrold Nadler (D) said, “I think Comey is an honest man who’s extremely self-righteous and thought he could, in his own judgment, violate Justice Department guidelines, with very unfortunate results.” Comey said on CBS’ Late Show[image: Image removed by sender. Video] <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018041801biden&r=email-13ef&l=025-bc2&t=c> (4/17, Colbert) that his action “was the least-worst way to close the [Clinton] investigation and maintain public confidence that it was done in a competent, honest, and independent way. ... There were a number of things that had happened leading up to the end of the investigation.” *Pro-Trump Group Fundraising Off Comey Book. *The Washington Times <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018041801biden&r=email-13ef&l=026-fe0&t=c> (4/17, Persons) reports that the Trump Make America Great Again Committee used the release of Comey’s book “as an opportunity for a fundraising tactic.” Supporters “received an email blast...slamming Mr. Comey as being a member of ‘the swamp’ and urging people to donate to Mr. Trump’s re-election efforts to avoid keeping men like Mr. Comey in power.” Foreign Policy Pompeo Met With Kim; Trump Says US, North Korea Talking At “Extremely High Levels.” Media coverage of President Trump’s remarks Tuesday on North Korea is rather straightforward, with reports focusing on his disclosure that the US and North Korea have been holding talks, and that the North and Seoul are working on a negotiated end to hostilities. Trump’s remarks came as it was revealed that CIA Director Pompeo recently visited Pyongyang. NBC Nightly News[image: Image removed by sender. Video] <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018041801biden&r=email-13ef&l=027-263&t=c> (4/17, story 3, 1:55, Holt) – the only network to report the story – said that at a “critical meeting” with Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe at Mar-a-Lago, Trump revealed that talks have been held with North Korea at “extremely high levels.” The Washington Post <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018041801biden&r=email-13ef&l=028-54d&t=c> (4/17, Harris, Leonnig, Jaffe, Nakamura) suggests Trump was alluding to an “extraordinary face-to-face meeting” between Kim and Pompeo “over Easter weekend.” According to “two people with direct knowledge of the trip,” the meeting was “part of an effort to lay the groundwork for direct talks between Trump and Kim.” The CIA and the White House both declined to comment. The New York Times <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018041801biden&r=email-13ef&l=029-975&t=c> (4/17, Landler, Rosenberg) too says Trump “alluded to Mr. Pompeo’s mission” when he said the US was in direct talks with North Korea at “extremely high levels.” According to unnamed officials, Pompeo “has been dealing with North Korean representatives through a channel that runs between the CIA and its North Korean counterpart, the Reconnaissance General Bureau.” On CNN’s Anderson Cooper 360[image: Image removed by sender. Video] <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018041801biden&r=email-13ef&l=02a-824&t=c> (4/17), Jim Acosta said, “My colleagues Jeff Zeleny and Elise Labott confirmed that...Pompeo...flew to North Korea, [and] met with Kim Jong-un with other intelligence officials.” The AP <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018041801biden&r=email-13ef&l=02b-621&t=c> (4/18, Lee, Miller) likewise reports that two officials confirmed Pompeo’s trip. According to a front-page story in the Wall Street Journal <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018041801biden&r=email-13ef&l=02c-109&t=c> (4/17, A1, Ballhaus, Nicholas, Cheng), a US official said the direct talks with Kim are ongoing. The Washington Times <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018041801biden&r=email-13ef&l=02d-2ab&t=c> (4/17, Boyer) and Washington Examiner <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018041801biden&r=email-13ef&l=02e-9eb&t=c> (4/17, Morrongiello) also report on the meeting. Bloomberg News <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018041801biden&r=email-13ef&l=02f-ab7&t=c> (4/17, Olorunnipa, Talev) says Trump also revealed Tuesday that five locations are under consideration for his meeting with Kim, and “suggested he was responsible not only for the negotiations on a formal peace treaty ending the war, but also the success of this year’s winter Olympics in South Korea.” Said Trump, “They’ve been very generous that without us and without me in particular, I guess, they wouldn’t be discussing anything and the Olympics would have been a failure.” The Washington Post <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018041801biden&r=email-13ef&l=030-486&t=c> (4/17, Harris, Leonnig, Jaffe, Nakamura) likewise said in an early online report that “Trump took some credit for the rapid developments related to North Korea.” The Wall Street Journal <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018041801biden&r=email-13ef&l=031-a0d&t=c> (4/17, Ballhaus, Nicholas) reported online that Abe said he had “observed major change in terms of North Korea’s behavior” since the Olympics, and credited Trump for the shift, saying, “Your stance made it possible to achieve this major change.” USA Today <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018041801biden&r=email-13ef&l=032-4ee&t=c> (4/17, Jackson) says that while Trump “repeated that he plans to meet with Kim,” he also “raised the possibility the summit might be called off because of a lack of agreement over an agenda.” Said Trump, “It’s possible things won’t go well and we won’t have the meetings, and we’ll just continue to go on this very strong path we have taken.” The Washington Examiner <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018041801biden&r=email-13ef&l=033-84f&t=c> (4/17, Correll) similarly reports that he “left the door open that the meetings might not happen,” Reuters <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018041801biden&r=email-13ef&l=034-bb4&t=c> (4/17, Holland) that he indicated that “it was possible that diplomatic efforts to arrange a summit will fall short,” and the Washington Examiner <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018041801biden&r=email-13ef&l=035-b18&t=c> (4/17, Morrongiello) says Trump “cautioned that his meeting with Kim is not yet set in stone.” To Politico <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018041801biden&r=email-13ef&l=036-941&t=c> (4/17, Forgey), the President “continued to play coy about the potentially historic meeting,” saying, “We’ll either have a very good meeting, or we won’t have a good meeting, and maybe we won’t even have a meeting at all, depending on what’s going in.” The AP <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018041801biden&r=email-13ef&l=037-3a4&t=c> (4/17, Colvin, Miller) reports that Trump “also confirmed that North and South Korea are negotiating an end to hostilities before next week’s meeting between Kim and South Korean President Moon Jae-in,” saying they “have my blessing to discuss the end of the war.” According to the Washington Times <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018041801biden&r=email-13ef&l=038-eb7&t=c> (4/17, Boyer), “some analysts expressed surprise at Mr. Trump’s comments,” and former National Security Council official Victor Cha called it “big news.” Cha told MSNBC[image: Image removed by sender. Video] <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018041801biden&r=email-13ef&l=039-411&t=c> (4/17), “He said the North and the South are talking about a peace treaty, which is something that’s never been said before by president about North and South Korea negotiating these things.” *In Tweet Today, Trump Says “Good Relationship Was Formed” At Pompeo-Kim Meeting. *Trump tweeted <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018041801biden&r=email-13ef&l=03a-8b8&t=c> this morning, “Mike Pompeo met with Kim Jong Un in North Korea last week. Meeting went very smoothly and a good relationship was formed. Details of Summit are being worked out now. Denuclearization will be a great thing for World, but also for North Korea!” *Seoul: Kim To Formally Announce Denuclearization Plans. *The New York Times <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018041801biden&r=email-13ef&l=03b-80d&t=c> (4/17, Choe) reports a South Korean official said Tuesday that Kim “plans to formally announce his willingness to denuclearize his country when he meets with President Moon Jae-in” later this month. The statement is expected to be “part of a joint declaration that the two leaders will adopt when they meet on April 27,” said Moon’s chief of staff, Im Jong-seok. Negotiators, however, are “still discussing other aspects of the joint statement, such as whether the two Koreas would commit to holding summit meetings on a regular basis.” Im said South Korea is “also trying to convince North Korea that Mr. Moon and Mr. Kim should hold a joint news conference at the end of their meeting.” The New York Post <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018041801biden&r=email-13ef&l=03c-7b1&t=c> (4/17, Steinbuch) quotes Im as telling reporters, “Even though our special envoys confirmed his denuclearization will, it is entirely different if the two leaders confirm it directly among themselves and put that into text.” Jonah Goldberg of National Review said on Fox News Special Report[image: Image removed by sender. Video] <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018041801biden&r=email-13ef&l=03d-c11&t=c> (4/17) that Trump “definitely gets considerable credit for forcing, at the very minimum, these rhetorical concessions, which means something. For North Korea to talk about ending the war, that means something. That’s significant. To talk about denuclearization, that is significant. I’m still deeply skeptical, not as a criticism of Donald Trump, but as an observation about the North Koreans. They have considered being a nuclear power the central focus of their foreign policy and they have lied their way to get to it for two decades. The idea they are going to give that up suddenly without some assurances that...I don’t think we could give? I’m just very skeptical.” Kudlow Apologizes For Saying Haley Got “Ahead Of The Curve” On Russian Sanctions. The New York Times <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018041801biden&r=email-13ef&l=03e-27c&t=c> (4/17, Landler) reports the White House “put further daylight” between President Trump and Ambassador Haley on Tuesday, as chief economic adviser Larry Kudlow said she had gotten “ahead of the curve” in announcing new sanctions against Russia on Sunday. On Monday, White House officials said the President “had not yet decided whether to impose sanctions on Russian companies found to be assisting Syria’s chemical weapons program,” which “contradicted” Haley’s comments that new sanctions would be announced Monday. Speaking to reporters in Florida, Kudlow said, “She got ahead of the curve. She’s done a great job. She’s a very effective ambassador, but there might have been some momentary confusion about that.” The AP <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018041801biden&r=email-13ef&l=03f-4b6&t=c> (4/17, Colvin, Miller) says the White House “has been struggling to explain Haley’s comments, amid reports that Trump put the brakes on the new sanctions,” and to The Hill <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018041801biden&r=email-13ef&l=040-7d9&t=c> (4/17, Fabian), the “mixed signals over sanctions created a headache for the White House, which has long battled accusations that Trump has treated Russian President Vladimir Putin with kid gloves.” The Washington Post <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018041801biden&r=email-13ef&l=041-224&t=c> (4/17, Gearan) reports Haley “rejected” Kudlow’s suggestion “that she had bungled an announcement of new Russia sanctions out of ‘confusion.’” In a statement to Dana Perino of Fox News[image: Image removed by sender. Video] <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018041801biden&r=email-13ef&l=042-67a&t=c> (4/17), Haley said, “With all due respect, I don’t get confused.” Haley, whose office “confirmed the quote but did not elaborate,” has been “otherwise silent about the unusual dust-up over her remarks Sunday.” John Roberts reported on Fox News Special Report[image: Image removed by sender. Video] <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018041801biden&r=email-13ef&l=043-de8&t=c> (4/17) that according to Perino, Haley “has been trying to get in touch with...Kudlow all day. He hasn’t been taking her calls because he is wrapped up” in talks with Japanese officials at Mar-a-Lago, “but [Haley] is going to try to get him tonight and I don’t want to be him when she does.” John Acosta said on CNN’s Anderson Cooper 360[image: Image removed by sender. Video] <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018041801biden&r=email-13ef&l=044-c94&t=c> (4/17), “I was able to confirm that Larry Kudlow...called Nikki Haley to apologize and said during the course of that phone call that the policy had changed and that nobody had kept her in the loop.” Kudlow confirmed the apology, telling the New York Times <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018041801biden&r=email-13ef&l=045-b70&t=c> (4/17, Landler) by phone, “She was certainly not confused. I was wrong to say that – totally wrong.” The Washington Times <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018041801biden&r=email-13ef&l=046-ab3&t=c> (4/17, Boyer) also reports Kudlow’s apology. The New York Times <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018041801biden&r=email-13ef&l=047-485&t=c> (4/17, Landler) reports an “official informed about the moment” said President Trump “was watching television on Sunday when he saw...Haley...announce that he would impose fresh sanctions on Russia. The president grew angry,” because “as far as he was concerned, he had decided no such thing.” The Times says the “divergence has spilled into public in a remarkable display of discord that stems not just from competing views of Russia but from larger questions of political ambition, jealousy, resentment and loyalty.” According to “several officials, the White House did not inform Ms. Haley that it had changed course on sanctions, leaving her to hang out alone.” Politico <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018041801biden&r=email-13ef&l=048-2c3&t=c> (4/17, Johnson) reports Trump “gave approval last week for rolling out airstrikes in Syria as well as new sanctions on Russia, according to three senior administration officials – but...Haley wasn’t briefed on changes to the sanctions plan.” Politico says the “episode marks the latest instance of members of Trump’s team appearing out of sync with one another or with the president on foreign affairs.” *State Department In Talks With US Airlines About Expiring Russia Overflight Deal. *Reuters <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018041801biden&r=email-13ef&l=049-4e2&t=c> (4/17, Wroughton, Shepardson, Alexander, Stolyarov) reports the State Department “met with US carriers ahead of a deadline later on Tuesday to extend an agreement with Russia that would allow for continued overflights by US airlines and said it was working to prevent any disruptions.” Spokeswoman Heather Nauert said, “We don’t want that kind of aviation disruption, so we’re trying to facilitate a working arrangement,” adding the Russian government had canceled a meeting in Washington earlier this week to discuss renewing the agreement. “Russia has not yet indicated whether it will extend the approvals by the Russian government, but we are expecting a Russian response hopefully later today,” she added. *US, UK Issue Joint Alert About Russian Cyber Attacks. *The CBS Evening News[image: Image removed by sender. Video] <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018041801biden&r=email-13ef&l=04a-7e5&t=c> (4/17, story 7, 0:50, Glor) reported, “In a rare joint alert, US and British intelligence officials are warning that Russian hackers are trying to take control of computers in America to lay the groundwork for future cyber attacks.” DHS Secretary Nielsen: “They were exploiting and scanning vulnerabilities in networked devices, including routers, which we all have in our homes. ... The gist of it is, anything that’s connected to the Internet could be attacked through the Internet. I think we’ll see more and more instances where there are causes of concern for everyday devices.” *British Scientists: Skripal Poisoned With Small Amount Of Nerve Agent. *The New York Times <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018041801biden&r=email-13ef&l=04b-209&t=c> (4/17, Barry) reports British environmental scientists said that former Russian spy Sergei V. Skripal and his daughter were poisoned by a “very small amount” of liquid nerve agent that, in the Times’ words, “did not release gases or vapors.” However, authorities said that the decontamination process could last “a number of months.” Mattis Urged Trump To Seek Congressional Approval For Syria Airstrikes. The New York Times <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018041801biden&r=email-13ef&l=04c-3e6&t=c> (4/17, Cooper) reports Defense Secretary Mattis “urged President Trump to get congressional approval before the United States launched airstrikes against Syria last week,” but the President overruled him, seeking “a rapid and dramatic response, military and administration officials said.” However, “Mattis prevailed in limiting the strikes to three targets that did not risk endangering Russian troops.” The limited strikes on three target were a “compromise” between those warning “that an overly aggressive response risked igniting a wider war with Russia” and Trump’s desire “to be seen as backing up a series of bellicose tweets with action.” Meanwhile, “Mattis publicly disputed suggestions on Tuesday that the limited strikes amounted to little more than a public relations punch,” saying at the Pentagon, “We did what we believe was right under international law, under our nation’s laws. And I hope that this time, the Assad regime got the message.” *Saudi Arabia In Talks With US On Sending Troops To Syria. *The Washington Post <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018041801biden&r=email-13ef&l=04d-b71&t=c> (4/17, Morris, Deyoung) reports that, as the Administration “seeks ways to stabilize” northeast Syria “while winding down its own military presence,” Saudi Foreign Minister Adel al-Jubeir said his country is in discussions with the United States on sending troops to Syria. He said, “We are in discussions with the US and have been since the beginning of the Syrian crisis about sending forces into Syria.” While the Administration is seeking “to persuade countries in the Persian Gulf to pick up the financial and military burden of stabilization as it draws down US forces,” creating “a pan-Arab force is likely to be a challenge.” Recent comments from Jubeir and Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman indicate “an acceptance” that Syrian President Bashar al-Assad will remain in power, and Egypt “has tacitly expressed support for Assad.” *Susan Rice Offers Plan For US Involvement In Syria. *Former National Security Adviser Susan E. Rice, in an op-ed in the New York Times <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018041801biden&r=email-13ef&l=04e-f25&t=c> (4/17, Rice), writes that with the conflict in Syria “growing increasingly complex and dangerous,” there is an increased need for the US “to clarify its strategic objectives in Syria and pursue them with ruthless discipline.” The current “standoffs risk escalating into sustained conflict,” and “the United States’ policy options, ever bad, are more limited and less effectual than ever.” Rice, saying that sticking to narrowly defined objectives remain the least bad approach, warns, “the path forward will continue to be perilous and deeply unsatisfying.” She calls for the US to maintain current force levels, not move to depose Syrian leader Bashar al-Assad, “sustain its generous humanitarian assistance,” and push for a negotiated settlement to the conflict. Rice concludes that by doing so the US will remain “focused on clear and achievable objectives, avoid strategic overreach and wisely tend to our core national interests.” *US, Syria Offer Conflicting Accounts Of Whether Chemical Weapons Inspectors Reached Douma. *Reuters <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018041801biden&r=email-13ef&l=04f-966&t=c> (4/17, Wroughton) reports the US and Syria offered “conflicting accounts on Tuesday of whether global chemical weapons inspectors had reached the Syrian town of Douma where a suspected poison gas attack took place.” While Syrian state television reported that Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons experts entered the town, State Department spokeswoman Heather Nauert said, “Our understanding is that the team has not entered Douma.” Similarly, “a diplomatic source in The Hague said the experts did not enter Douma.” *Destruction Of Syrian Medical Infrastructure Causing Public-Health Crisis. *The Wall Street Journal <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018041801biden&r=email-13ef&l=050-106&t=c> (4/17, A1, Abdulrahim) reports that Syrian civil war has produced a serious public-health crisis, as the breakdown of its health system has left chronic conditions such as diabetes and heart disease untreated. The Journal adds that President Bashar al-Assad targeted the country’s medical infrastructure, and as result Syrian life expectancy has dropped below 65 as people die for lack of medical treatment. The Syrian regime denies purposely attacking healthcare facilities. *In Warning, Israel Releases Details On Iranian Planes Deployed In Syria. *Reuters <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018041801biden&r=email-13ef&l=051-879&t=c> (4/17, Williams) reports that, in “a signal that these could be attacked should tensions with Tehran escalate,” Israel released details on what it called an Iranian “air force” deployed in Syria. The data include “satellite images and a map of five Syrian air bases allegedly used to field Iranian drones or cargo aircraft, as well as the names of three senior IRGC officers suspected of commanding related projects.” *Israel Strike On Iranian Air Defense In Syria Came After Consultation With US. *The Wall Street Journal <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018041801biden&r=email-13ef&l=052-cd9&t=c> (4/17, Nissenbaum, Jones) reports that, in the latest indication that the Administration is seeking to counter expanding Iranian influence in the Middle East, intelligence officials and others briefed on the matter say Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu conferred with President Trump prior to ordering an Israeli military strike on a new Iranian antiaircraft battery at a Syrian base last week. The Journal cast the attack as a serious escalation in Israel’s fight against Iran’s military presence in Syria, and some US officials are concerned that an Israel-Iran fight in Syria could cause new conflicts involving Lebanon and Israel. Senate Panel Asks “Tough Questions” On US Support For Conflict In Yemen. The Washington Post <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018041801biden&r=email-13ef&l=053-7ae&t=c> (4/17, Ryan) reports that as “congressional pressure grows to reconsider the American role in” the conflict in Yemen, Administration officials from the Pentagon, the State Department, and USAID “faced tough questions” from the Senate Foreign Relations Committee on US military support for the Persian Gulf nations involved in the conflict. The Post casts the questioning as an indication of “growing discomfort with US support for the campaign.” State Department acting assistant secretary for the Middle East David Satterfield said the governments in the conflict have been warned “against taking action that could bring more deprivation and suffering to Yemenis.” He said, “We would not view such an action consistent with our own policy upon which our support is based.” The Post adds, “the officials’ defense of current policy reflects the Trump administration’s emphasis on loyalty to Saudi Arabia, its chief Arab ally, and its desire to push back against Iran.” US Wants To Transfer US-Born ISIS Suspect From Iraq To Another Country. The New York Times <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018041801biden&r=email-13ef&l=054-c31&t=c> (4/17, Savage) reports that the US military “intends to transfer an American citizen who has been detained in Iraq for more than seven months to the custody of another country in several days,” the Justice Department told a federal judge on Tuesday. The man’s attorney said that his client, “whose name has not been made public, does not want to go to that country and intends to fight the proposed transfer in court.” The man was born in the US to visiting Saudi parents and was raised in Saudi Arabia. He was captured by a Syrian militia last fall “and turned over to American forces as a suspected low-level Islamic State member.” Kudlow Downplays Possibility Of US Rejoining TPP. The Washington Times <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018041801biden&r=email-13ef&l=055-1a9&t=c> (4/17, Boyer) reports White House economic adviser Larry Kudlow on Tuesday “downplayed” the likelihood of the US rejoining the Trans-Pacific Partnership trade agreement, saying the request by President Trump is more of a “thought than a policy” right now. As the President prepared to meet with Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe, Kudlow told reporters that the US is “in the pre-preliminary stages of any discussions” on rejoining the trade agreement, including Japan. He said the Administration would still prefer to reach a separate free-trade pact with Japan. The Hill <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018041801biden&r=email-13ef&l=056-c5c&t=c> (4/17, Fabian) too says Kudlow “downplayed the possibility” that the US would rejoin the TPP, saying there “are discussions and considerations” about reentering the pact, but cautioned “there is nothing at all concrete.” Asked earlier on Fox News’ Fox & Friends[image: Image removed by sender. Video] <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018041801biden&r=email-13ef&l=057-8b3&t=c> (4/17) about the possibility of the US getting back into the TPP, Kudlow said, “It’s possible if and only if there are major improvements to the existing TPP. That is the President’s key point. He is not a big fan of these multilateral agreements. He would rather go country to country, so-called bilateral, like we are going to talk with Japan today and tomorrow. We’ll see about this, He wants to take another look at it. ... We’ll see. We’re going to go slow.” *Trump: “Bilateral Deals Are Far More Efficient.” *President Trump tweeted <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018041801biden&r=email-13ef&l=058-555&t=c> Tuesday evening, “While Japan and South Korea would like us to go back into TPP, I don’t like the deal for the United States. Too many contingencies and no way to get out if it doesn’t work. Bilateral deals are far more efficient, profitable and better for OUR workers. Look how bad WTO is to U.S.” *Poll: Support For Trump Trade Policies Weaker Among Independents, Moderate Republicans. *The New York Times <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018041801biden&r=email-13ef&l=059-6c8&t=c> (4/17, Casselman, Tankersley) reports President Trump’s trade policies “enjoy the strong backing of his supporters but are less popular among independents, moderate Republicans and others whose votes could decide control of Congress in the midterm election this fall.” Americans are “about evenly split on the steel and aluminum tariffs that Mr. Trump announced early last month, according to a survey conducted in early April” for the New York Times by SurveyMonkey. According to the survey, “support split mostly along predictable partisan lines, with 78 percent of Republicans supporting Mr. Trump’s tariffs and 74 percent of Democrats opposing them.” Support for the measure was “also softer among better-educated and wealthier Americans of both political parties, echoing other evidence that backing for Mr. Trump’s agenda is weaker in the affluent suburbs that were once a Republican stronghold.” *China To Ease Rules On Foreign Auto Makers. *In what the Wall Street Journal <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018041801biden&r=email-13ef&l=05a-a9d&t=c> (4/17, Moss, Colias) calls a concession to the US, China announced Tuesday it will ease joint-venture rules on foreign auto companies. General Motors, however, has no plans to withdraw from its 10 Chinese joint ventures even if restrictions are lifted, according to sources. *FCC Votes To Block Sales By Chinese Telecom Equipment Makers. *The New York Times <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018041801biden&r=email-13ef&l=05b-325&t=c> (4/17, Zhong, Mozur, Nicas) reports the US “undercut China’s technology ambitions on Tuesday, advancing a new rule that would limit the ability of Chinese telecommunications companies to sell their products in this country.” The Federal Communications Commission “voted unanimously to move forward with a plan that would prevent federally subsidized telecommunications carriers from using suppliers deemed to pose a risk to American national security.” The Times says the FCC’s decision “takes direct aim at Huawei...and its main Chinese rival, ZTE, sending a message that the government doesn’t trust them.” *Lawmakers Urge USDA To Limit Use Of Chinese Telecommunications. *The Washington Free Beacon <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018041801biden&r=email-13ef&l=05c-309&t=c> (4/17, Johnson) reports that a bipartisan group of lawmakers is calling on the Department of Agriculture “to tighten restrictions on Chinese telecommunications providers and manufacturers accused of spying on behalf” of Beijing. In a letter sent Monday to Secretary Perdue, “19 lawmakers urged the department to prohibit carriers from using money from the department’s Rural Utility Service (RUS) program to purchase equipment from Chinese companies deemed to pose a national security threat, including Huawei and ZTE.” *Trump’s “Buy American” Initiative Would Ease Export Rules For US Weapons. *Reuters <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018041801biden&r=email-13ef&l=05d-7d3&t=c> (4/17, Spetalnick) reports that President Trump in “private phone calls and public appearances with world leaders” has “gone further than any of his predecessors to act as a salesman for the US defense industry, analysts said.” His “efforts will be bolstered by the full weight of the US government when Trump’s administration rolls out a new ‘Buy American’ initiative as soon as this week aimed at allowing more countries to buy more and even bigger weapons.” According to “US officials,” the initiative “will loosen US export rules on equipment ranging from fighter jets and drones to warships and artillery.” Reuters added that it “will provide guidelines that could allow more countries to be granted faster deal approvals, possibly trimming back to months what has often taken years to finalize.” Members of Trump’s cabinet will “sometimes act as ‘closers’ to help seal major arms deals, according to people familiar with the matter.” McClatchy <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018041801biden&r=email-13ef&l=05e-ab1&t=c> (4/17, Hall) reports that while Smith & Wesson “and other iconic American brands like Sturm Ruger and the eventual owners of privately held Remington Outdoor are expected to benefit from a new policy,” opponents of the policy “argue that decision could come back to haunt the United States if the weapons end up in the wrong hands.” *IMF: Trade War Could Undermine Strong Global Economy. *The AP <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018041801biden&r=email-13ef&l=05f-93a&t=c> (4/17, Wiseman) reports that while the IMF “has kept its forecast for worldwide growth this year at 3.9 percent,” the agency warned Tuesday “that rising trade tensions between the United States and China risk undermining a global economy.” IMF chief economist Maurice Obstfeld told a news conference that the IMF “had run economic simulations about the impact of a far-reaching trade war that would include across-the-board tariffs of 10 percent.” Obstfeld said the computer simulations showed a “fairly substantial” impact from such tariffs. Nielsen Warns Of “Unintended Consequences” Of New European Data Privacy Law. Reuters <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018041801biden&r=email-13ef&l=060-6f8&t=c> (4/17, Volz) reports that DHS Secretary Nielsen warned Tuesday “that a European data privacy law taking effect next month may have ‘unintended consequences’ that harm the United States’ ability to protect itself from cyber attacks.” Speaking at the RSA cyber security conference in San Francisco, Nielsen said online data privacy “is important and contextual across borders and different cultures...but ‘what we don’t want are the unintended consequences of preventing the research community to be able to give us a heads up on (cyber) threats that are coming our way.’” Domestic Policy Gorsuch Joins Supreme Court Liberals To Strike Down Part Of Immigration Law. The Supreme Court on Tuesday struck down a portion of federal immigration law that subjected immigrants convicted of serious crimes to deportation. The decision prompted President Trump to issue a pair of tweets urging Congress to take action on immigration. Trump tweeted <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018041801biden&r=email-13ef&l=061-36e&t=c>, “Today’s Court decision means that Congress must close loopholes that block the removal of dangerous criminal aliens, including aggravated felons. This is a public safety crisis that can only be fixed by ... <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018041801biden&r=email-13ef&l=062-e47&t=c> Congress – House and Senate must quickly pass a legislative fix to ensure violent criminal aliens can be removed from our society. Keep America Safe!” The AP <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018041801biden&r=email-13ef&l=063-ee3&t=c> (4/17, Gresko) calls the decision “a loss” for the Administration, “which has emphasized stricter enforcement of immigration law,” while the Washington Post <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018041801biden&r=email-13ef&l=064-c2f&t=c> (4/17, Barnes) says it “could limit the government’s ability to deport those with criminal records, something that President Trump has identified as a priority,” and Politico <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018041801biden&r=email-13ef&l=065-c02&t=c> (4/17, Gerstein) says it is “likely to irritate the White House.” The Washington Examiner <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018041801biden&r=email-13ef&l=066-e22&t=c> (4/17, Quinn) reports that in its 5-4 decision, the Court sided with James Garcia Dimaya, a native of the Philippines, who “was convicted of residential burglary conviction in 2007 and 2009, though neither involved violence.” The Obama Administration sought Dimaya’s deportation and the Justice Department’s Board of Immigration Appeals agreed, arguing that “one of the convictions constituted an ‘aggravated felony’ under the Immigration and National Act and therefore made him subject to deportation.” In 2015, the 9th US Circuit Court of Appeals ruled “that the definition of ‘aggravated felony,’ which includes the definition of ‘crimes of violence,’ was unconstitutionally vague.” The Supreme Court affirmed the ruling. The New York Times <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018041801biden&r=email-13ef&l=067-915&t=c> (4/17, Liptak) says Justice Neil Gorsuch joined “the court’s four more liberal members to form a bare majority,” in the decision which will “limit the Trump administration’s efforts to deport people convicted of some kinds of crimes.” Gorsuch wrote in a concurring opinion, “Vague laws...invite arbitrary power.” The Washington Times <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018041801biden&r=email-13ef&l=068-f58&t=c> (4/17, Dinan) reports that it was one of Gorsuch’s “first major breaks with fellow conservatives.” Gorsuch “and the liberal bloc said that if Congress wants to make legal immigrants deportable for lower-level felonies they can write those offenses into the law – but they can’t use a ‘vague’ catch-all definition to cover any serious crimes they didn’t list.” The Wall Street Journal <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018041801biden&r=email-13ef&l=069-069&t=c> (4/17, Kendall) says Gorsuch’s stance was not surprising, noting that like his predecessor Justice Antonin Scalia, Gorsuch has supported procedural protections against wide-ranging government power for defendants. Trump Blasts Brown Over National Guard Troops On California-Mexico Border. The Washington Post <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018041801biden&r=email-13ef&l=06a-58b&t=c> (4/17, Wagner) reports that after praising California Gov. Jerry Brown last week “for agreeing to send National Guard troops to the border,” Trump on Tuesday “was back on Twitter, taking aim at Brown,” in the wake of “word that California’s National Guard has told Homeland Security officials the state will not allow its soldiers to do the types of things others are doing elsewhere on the border: monitoring surveillance cameras, performing maintenance and transporting US border agents.” Trump tweeted <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018041801biden&r=email-13ef&l=06b-6d2&t=c>, “Looks like Jerry Brown and California are not looking for safety and security along their very porous Border. He cannot come to terms for the National Guard to patrol and protect the Border. The high crime rate will only get higher. Much wanted Wall in San Diego already started!” The Washington Free Beacon <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018041801biden&r=email-13ef&l=06c-332&t=c> (4/17, Crabtree) says the Administration and Brown have been “negotiating exactly what role the troops would serve” and the “exact disputes between Brown and the Trump administration remain unclear.” The Los Angeles Times <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018041801biden&r=email-13ef&l=06d-738&t=c> (4/17, Wire) reports that in remarks at the National Press Club on Tuesday, Brown “downplayed the confrontation with Trump.” Brown “said he didn’t see the president’s tweet,” and “said he still expects the California National Guard to reach a compromise with the federal government that also adheres to the limitations outlined in his letter.” However, he “didn’t back away from his restrictions on what the Guard would be allowed to do.” Brown said, “Trying to stop drug smuggling, human tracking and guns going to Mexico to the cartels, that sounds to me like fighting crime. ... Trying to catch some desperate mothers and children, unaccompanied minors coming from Central America? That sounds like something else.” The Washington Post <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018041801biden&r=email-13ef&l=06e-fbd&t=c> (4/17, Miroff) reports Brown “said he wants to be ‘cooperative’ with the Trump administration, and he appreciated the president’s April 12 tweet applauding him for agreeing to join the troop deployment.” Said Brown, “There’s been a little bit of back and forth, as you always get with bureaucrats. ... But I think we can find common understanding here. There’s enough problems at the border and the interface between our countries that California will have plenty to do – and we’re willing to do it.” *In Tweet Today, Trump Says “Revolution” In California Over Border Security. *Trump tweeted <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018041801biden&r=email-13ef&l=06f-346&t=c> this morning, “There is a Revolution going on in California. Soooo many Sanctuary areas want OUT of this ridiculous, crime infested & breeding concept. Jerry Brown is trying to back out of the National Guard at the Border, but the people of the State are not happy. Want Security & Safety NOW!” *San Diego County To Join Administration Challenge To California’s Sanctuary Law. *Reuters <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018041801biden&r=email-13ef&l=070-4ea&t=c> (4/17, McEntee) reports that San Diego County leaders have voted “to join the Trump administration’s court challenge to a California law limiting cooperation with federal immigration enforcement.” In a 3-1 vote, the GOP-controlled Board of Supervisors “voted to direct the county attorney to file a friend-of-the-court brief supporting the administration’s lawsuit at the first available opportunity.” *Los Alamitos Votes To Exempt Itself From Sanctuary Law. *The Los Angeles Times <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018041801biden&r=email-13ef&l=071-f51&t=c> (4/17, Carcamo) reports that the Los Alamitos City Council voted Monday “to give final approval to an ordinance to exempt the city from the state’s laws designed to protect immigrants in the country illegally.” *Brown: “Low-Life Politicians” To Blame For Backlash Against Sanctuary Policies. *Breitbart <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018041801biden&r=email-13ef&l=072-706&t=c> (4/17, Pollak) reports that in an appearance at the National Press Club on Tuesday, Gov. Brown blamed “low-life politicians” for the “growing backlash” against California’s “sanctuary state” policies. Brown said of the backlash, “It’s an inflammatory football that very low-life politicians are trying to exploit.” *ICE Arrested 225 Peopl In, Around New York City Last Week. *The Washington Times <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018041801biden&r=email-13ef&l=073-f36&t=c> (4/17, Dinan) reports on Tuesday, Thomas R. Decker, director of ICE’s deportation office in New York, announced that “officers arrested 225 immigrants in a targeted sweep in New York City and the surrounding area.” Decker also said that 60 or more of those arrested “had been released by local police despite being sought by ICE officers.” Decker said, “ICE continues to face significant obstacles with policies created by local officials which hinder cooperation between ICE and local law enforcement.” Among those arrested were some who had “rape, manslaughter, firearms and drunken-driving convictions.” *Survey Finds 80% Of Hondurans Traveling North Seeking Better Opportunities. *The Washington Times <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018041801biden&r=email-13ef&l=074-f37&t=c> (4/17, Dinan) reports on a survey of about 1,600 Hondurans by the Reflection, Research and Communication Team, affiliated with the Roman Catholic order the Society of Jesus. The survey found that most Hondurans who travel to the US “are actually regular economic migrants.” According to the study, “more than 80 percent told pollsters it’s all about better opportunities elsewhere.” The survey also found that “a stunning 44.3 percent of Hondurans said they are looking to emigrate.” *Cato Institute Study Says US Immigrant Screening Is Effective. *The New York Times <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018041801biden&r=email-13ef&l=075-acd&t=c> (4/17, Nixon) reports the Cato Institute issued a study on Tuesday, finding that the US “already had a robust vetting system” for immigration, developed after September 11, 2001. The study found that “just 13 of 531 people convi
METADATA:
THREAD:
INDEX:
AQIzSejwBk1H1uRF+hVk1f3ZcefoWKNHoZ6Q
REFERENCES:
REPLY_TO:
<0.0.0.24.1D3D70C49BED020.0@colo032.bulletinnews.com>
REFS:
<0.0.0.24.1D3D70C49BED020.0@colo032.bulletinnews.com>