EMAIL DETAILS

I am sure we can do it.

If you give me the exact names of the parties, who we would represent and
who are the defendants, I can arrange for the conflict check

On 3/17/14 11:36 AM, "Hunter Biden" <hbiden@rosemontseneca.com> wrote:

>It is adverse to Wilmington Trust and on behalf of one of the heirs to
>the Hunt family fortune from Texas (against his father). Do we have
>anyone who could do the work in Chancery Court in DE and are we in anyway
>conflicted. I can get more info if we have an interest. Supposedly
>hundreds of millions of dollars at stake in father - son battle over the
>trust.
>This is time sensitive.
>
>RHB
>202.333.1880
>


IRS Circular 230 disclosure:
To ensure compliance with requirements imposed by the IRS, unless we expressly state otherwise, we inform you that any U.S. federal tax advice contained in this communication (including any attachments) is not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of (i) avoiding penalties under the Internal Revenue Code or (ii) promoting, marketing or recommending to another party any transaction or matter addressed herein.

The information contained in this electronic message is confidential information intended only for the use of the named recipient(s) and may contain information that, among other protections, is the subject of attorney-client privilege, attorney work product or exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader of this electronic message is not the named recipient, or the employee or agent responsible to deliver it to the named recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, copying or other use of this communication is strictly prohibited and no privilege is waived. If you have received this communication in error, please immediately notify the sender by replying to this electronic message and then deleting this electronic message from your computer. [v.1]