EMAIL DETAILS
SUBJECT:
RE: FAO response to NY Times
PRI: NORMAL
FROM:
R
rrussell@russellgroupdc.com
DATE:
2014-10-02 19:48:54
MSG_ID:
<7e02235857464a59ad38e2fd621845df@BLUPR06MB611.namprd06.prod.outlook.com>
RECIPIENTS:
TO:
D
dan.glickman@aspeninstitute.org
H
Hunter Biden
<hbiden@rosemontseneca.com>
R
Rick Leach
<rleach@wfpusa.org>
S
Samuel "Sandy" Berger
<sberger@albrightstonebridge.com>
CONTENT:
TEXT: YES |
HTML: YES
PROCESSED
With all due respect to the FAO-this is a very weak response. If the strength of your argument is relying on individual country data-there truly is a problem. There is no explanation for the changing methodology. Overall, reading this, I am unconvinced. Randy From: Rick Leach [mailto:RLeach@wfpusa.org] Sent: Thursday, October 02, 2014 3:38 PM To: Glickman, Dan (Dan.Glickman@aspeninstitute.org); Randy Russell; Hunter Biden; Samuel "Sandy" Berger Subject: FAO response to NY Times FYI, the response from FAO to the piece in Sunday's NY Times on the global hunger numbers: http://www.nytimes.com/2014/10/02/opinion/world-hunger-numbers-and-solutions.html?_r=1 Richard Leach President & CEO World Food Program USA 1725 Eye Street NW, Suite 510 Washington, DC 20006 T 202.627.3737 F 202.530.1698 rleach@wfpusa.org<mailto:jcorum@wfpusa.org>
METADATA:
THREAD:
TOPIC:
FAO response to NY Times
INDEX:
Ac/eeEsqUo6Er837QBydV4uMTl2f5gAATd+g
REFERENCES:
REPLY_TO:
<98350cfa76654581822575fcb3ea3953@WFPUSA-EXCH02.friendsofwfp.org>
REFS:
<98350cfa76654581822575fcb3ea3953@WFPUSA-EXCH02.friendsofwfp.org>