EMAIL DETAILS

By the way, I skipped one complete chapter - can't remember which one but it was the one with the hardest math and the instructor recommended I skip it because there are so few questions on the test. You only need a 72% to pass!


Eric D. Schwerin
Rosemont Seneca Partners, LLC
1010 Wisconsin Ave., NW
Suite 705
Washington, DC 20007
(202) 333-1880
eschwerin@rosemontseneca.com
P Consider the environment before printing this email.

On Feb 12, 2014, at 11:29 AM, Devon Archer <darcher@rosemontseneca.com> wrote:

It's still on my bedside table. about 25% of the way through.


On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 11:02 AM, Eric Schwerin <eschwerin@rosemontseneca.com> wrote:
I will of course play the role of the risk averse contrarian but my read of this is that it only relates to referral fees if the investment is made for 25% or more of a company or investment (see the qualification, "if the active operation requirement is met through governance arrangements").

That is, a $1m investment into a blind pool wouldn't count unless it was for more than 25% of the GP.

But, if RSTP wanted to do investment banking for Counsyl and raise money for someone to buy 25% or more of the company, Counsyl could pay RSTP an investment banking fee for doing so and RSTP wouldn't have to do it through a BD. To me, it also would mean that RSTP could pay a referral fee to a third party who identifies the money for the transaction.

So I wouldn't throw out the book just yet, Devon. :-)


Eric D. Schwerin
eschwerin@rosemontseneca.com

Sent from my iPhone

On Feb 12, 2014, at 9:48 AM, Hunter Biden <hbiden@rosemontseneca.com> wrote:

> "Many private equity firms rely on consultants, finders and other persons for referrals to possible investment and acquisition targets. Compensation for these referrals typically depends on the consummation of the transaction, which, under the SEC’s longstanding position, raised the issue whether persons making referrals should be registered as broker-dealers. In these circumstances, the question for private equity firms was whether they had exposure for facilitating transactions by an unregistered broker-dealer. The M&A Broker no-action letter addresses this concern, at least for referrals by persons meeting the requirements of the letter. In addition, the letter’s approach to the requirement of buyer control and operation of the target suggests that private fund sponsors could pay referral fees to M&A Brokers not only in transactions resulting in the transfer of the entire ownership interest of the target, but also in certain types of minority and venture capital investments, if the active operation requirement is met through governance arrangements."
>
> This seems to suggest that a third party can be paid a referral fee for raising money not only for a specific deal but for the funds' blind pool.
>
> R. Hunter Biden
> Rosemont Seneca Partners
> Washington D.C.
> 202-333-1880
>
>
>
> On Feb 12, 2014, at 6:44 AM, Devon Archer <darcher@rosemontseneca.com> wrote:
>
>> http://www.ropesgray.com/news-and-insights/Insights/2014/February/SEC-Issues-Broker-Dealer-No-Action-Letter-of-Interest-to-Private-Equity-Firms.aspx
>>
>>
>> Devon Archer
>> 646 436 3745
>