EMAIL DETAILS
SUBJECT:
Re: Connecting You
PRI: NORMAL
FROM:
J
john.sandweg@gmail.com
DATE:
2015-03-07 01:08:02
MSG_ID:
<E8A5489E-2031-4666-BAB8-11EED1001994@gmail.com>
RECIPIENTS:
TO:
H
Hunter Biden
<hbiden@rosemontseneca.com>
CC:
E
Eric Schwerin
<eschwerin@rosemontseneca.com>
J
Josh Targoff
<jtargoff@thirdpoint.com>
CONTENT:
TEXT: YES |
HTML: YES
PROCESSED
Josh- Sorry for the delay in getting back to you - been on a wretched travel schedule. Spoke with the former CBP Commissioner. Unfortunately, a success fee won't work in this matter. While I feel confident we can achieve some actions that will significantly reduce the likelihood of secondary inspection - for example, the insertion of a notation in Munib's records that will diminish the referrals to secondary - we can never guarantee that an individual officer won't utilize his discretion to put Munib in secondary based on his own biases. As such, it will be difficult to define success Although a success fee won't work, one alternative is an hourly rate with caps on the amount of time expended on the matter. We would staff the matter with the former head of CBP (who generally charges $700), myself and a former CBP officer ($450 an hour). Assuming there aren't any unexpected twists, I would estimate this matter would take approximately 15-20 hours. Again, the idea would be to initiate high level conversations at CBP to take steps to minimize the likelihood of suspicion less referrals to secondary. As we discussed, one alternative is to reach out to the Hill. The key is to have the member put pressure on CBP to insert a notation in Munib's TECS record (the CBP database utilized at ports of entry) that notes he has been subjected to secondary inspection on several occasions to negative effect. This will minimize the chances he will be placed into secondary on future entries into the US. Happy to provide additional info as needed and again apologize for the delay in getting back to the group. Let me know if I can be of further assistance. Sent from my iPhone > On Feb 13, 2015, at 4:29 PM, Hunter Biden <hbiden@rosemontseneca.com> wrote: > > I am available on cell- 202-552-9396 > > RHB > 202.333.1880 > >> On Feb 13, 2015, at 4:28 PM, Josh Targoff <JTargoff@thirdpoint.com> wrote: >> >> Thanks – I did not. Can we talk now? >> >> >> Josh Targoff >> Third Point LLC >> Tel: 212.715.3403 | Fax: 212.318.3806 >> <image001.png> >> >> From: Eric Schwerin [mailto:eschwerin@rosemontseneca.com] >> Sent: Friday, February 13, 2015 4:25 PM >> To: John Sandweg >> Cc: Josh Targoff; Hunter Biden >> Subject: Re: Connecting You >> >> Josh/John- >> >> Just wanted to make sure you all saw this email and were able to connect. >> >> Best, >> >> Eric >> >> >> >> Eric D. Schwerin >> Rosemont Seneca Partners, LLC >> 1010 Wisconsin Ave., NW >> Suite 705 >> Washington, DC 20007 >> (202) 333-1880 >> eschwerin@rosemontseneca.com >> P Consider the environment before printing this email. >> >> On Feb 12, 2015, at 9:28 AM, John Sandweg <john.sandweg@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Josh- >> >> Happy to discuss at your convenience. My schedule is pretty open this afternoon. Let me know if there is a time that works well for you. >> >> JA >> >> Sent from my iPhone >> >> On Feb 11, 2015, at 1:32 PM, Eric Schwerin <eschwerin@rosemontseneca.com> wrote: >> >> Josh- >> >> Per your conversation with Hunter, I wanted to connect you and Hunter with John Sandweg who might be able to be helpful with Munib’s issue. John and Hunter are both copied on this email and I’ll let you all coordinate a good time to talk. >> >> Let me know if you have trouble connecting. >> >> Best, >> >> Eric >> >> >> >> >> Eric D. Schwerin >> Rosemont Seneca Partners, LLC >> 1010 Wisconsin Ave., NW >> Suite 705 >> Washington, DC 20007 >> (202) 333-1880 >> eschwerin@rosemontseneca.com >> P Consider the environment before printing this email. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> "This communication may contain privileged or confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient(s), you are hereby notified that you have received this message in error and that any review, dissemination, distribution or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. Any views or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Third Point LLC or its affiliates. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by email, and delete the original and any copies of the message. We do not waive confidentiality if you have received this communication in error. In the UK, this communication is directed to those persons who are market counterparties or intermediate customers (as defined in the rules of the Financial Conduct Authority). >> >> This is not an offer, or solicitation of any offer, to buy or sell any security, investment or other product.
METADATA:
THREAD:
INDEX:
AdhhnkgxhB9I8OohS6SH/pCd6vEFRw==
REFERENCES:
REPLY_TO:
<737E7DB3-B356-47EB-ABDB-C32211865B41@rosemontseneca.com>
REFS:
<DE85AED3-9227-4163-8B39-1437B0CE74A1@gmail.com>
<0F379108-0706-4D54-A1AD-EEBAF95C8977@rosemontseneca.com>
<23064537-DA22-4C12-89BD-75AAA383B8DE@rosemontseneca.com>
<737E7DB3-B356-47EB-ABDB-C32211865B41@rosemontseneca.com>
<0CCFD41338CF8E47BA4649CA321F282A71C4D289@TP-NJ-MBX-02.3rdpoint.corp>