EMAIL DETAILS

It's from your syllabus. Please correct if necessary.

-- Katie Dodge
Rosemont Seneca Partners
202-333-1880

> On Mar 17, 2014, at 6:44 PM, Hunter Biden <hbiden@rosemontseneca.com> wrote:
>
> Did Rob send this to you?
>
> RHB
> 202.333.1880
>
>> On Mar 17, 2014, at 6:27 PM, Katie Dodge Rosemont Seneca Partners <kdodge@rosemontseneca.com> wrote:
>>
>> In the topic of Syria. This is the planned topic for Tuesday's class followed by general info on the course. And time for Q&A always good and appreciated.
>>
>> Class #9 – March 19 – Advocacy and Managing Alliances in an Age of Counterterrorism and Modern Warfare
>>
>> Themes:
>> oAdvocacy to augment counterterrorism and intelligence gathering operations
>> oThe role and necessity of advocacy in modern warfare
>> oAdvocacy in ambiguous strategic partnerships and semi-hostile alliances
>> oAdvocacy challenges associated with controversial policies and operations, such as targeted killings, drone warfare, and extraordinary rendition
>> We will examine the advocacy associated with counterterrorism operations and modern warfare. Our focus will be on the advocacy challenges that have emerged as the United States and its allies have expanded the use of targeted killings, extraordinary rendition, and drone warfare in counterterrorism, counter-insurgency, and intelligence gathering operations.
>>
>> Required Readings:
>> •Henry A. Crumpton, The Art of Intelligence: Lessons from a Life in the CIA's Clandestine Service
>> •Mark Bowden, The Finish
>> •Jane Mayer, “The Predator War”, The New Yorker, October 6, 2009, http://tinyurl.com/yksjegm
>> •Jonathan Masters, “Targeted Killings”, Council on Foreign Relations, April 30, 2012, http://tinyurl.com/bt83agw
>> •The New York Times, “Secret ‘Kill List’ Proves a Test of Obama’s Principles and Will”, http://tinyurl.com/9kvdbdk
>> •The New York Times, “Pakistan Gives U.S. a List of Demands, Including an End to C.I.A. Drone Strikes” ,April 12, 2012, http://tinyurl.com/74822dm
>>
>> Recommended Reading and Resources
>> •Micah Zenko, “U.S. Foreign Policy and Contested Sovereignty”, Politics, Power, and Preventive Action, Council on Foreign Relations, December 14, 2012,http://tinyurl.com/bmh3tpo
>> •The Daily Beast, “A Former Ambassador to Pakistan Speaks Out”, November 20, 2012,http://tinyurl.com/d2x2knh
>> •Remarks by John O. Brennan, Assistant to the President for Homeland Security and Counterterrorism, “The Ethics and Efficacy of the President’s Counterterrorism Strategy”, Wilson Center, April 30, 2012,http://tinyurl.com/7xxp58d
>> •Remarks of John O. Brennan, Assistant to the President for Homeland Security and Counterterrorism, "Strengthening our Security by Adhering to our Values and Laws", Program on Law and Security, Harvard Law School, September 16, 2011, http://tinyurl.com/4xs5tbq
>> •United Nations, “Report of the Special Rapporteur on extrajudicial, summary or arbitrary executions”,http://tinyurl.com/2a6sjqt
>> •Joshua Foust, “In Life and in Death, Bin Laden Divides U.S. and Pakistan”, The Atlantic, May 2, 2011,http://tinyurl.com/dyzw6aj
>> •Tara McKelvey, “ The CIA's Last-Minute Osama bin Laden Drama”, The Atlantic, http://tinyurl.com/celkdqg
>> •Howard LaFranchi, “US halts talks with Pakistan on supply routes. Could ties get any worse?”, The Christian Science Monitor, June 11, 2012,http://tinyurl.com/bos9k43
>> •The New York Times, “NATO Supply Trucks From Pakistan Resume Trek to Afghanistan”, July 5, 2012,http://tinyurl.com/c2nk244
>> •The New York Times, “High Court in Italy Backs Convictions for Rendition”, September 19, 2012,http://tinyurl.com/clhar84
>> •Scott Horton, “The Madrid Cables”, Harper’s Magazine, December 1, 2010, http://tinyurl.com/ccno7qr
>> •The New York Times, In Yemen, U.S. airstrikes breed anger, and sympathy for al-Qaeda, May 29, 2012,http://tinyurl.com/cl93ubx
>> •“Kill/Capture”, Frontline, May 10, 2011,http://tinyurl.com/3qectas
>> •“The Secret War”, Frontline, January 3, 2012,http://tinyurl.com/6rm23sx
>> About the Class generally.
>> Introduction
>>
>> This course examines the impact of advocacy on political leaders, staff, and other stakeholders responsible for shaping international policy and managing global crisis and conflict. The course uses a case format to study examples of advocacy in five real world situations. Each case will consist of two parts:
>>
>> 1.Discussion of an issue, policy, or event based on assigned reading(s);
>>
>> 2.An interactive group session with a policymaker, staff member, or other principal stakeholder who played a significant role or who has specific expertise or who played in the subject of the case study.
>>
>> Course Objectives & Skill Acquisition
>>
>> Our objective is to build a pragmatic understanding of thepractice and impact of advocacy within the development and implementation of public policy and the management of complex global issues and problems, such as famine, health pandemics, war, and acts of terrorism. The course will build practical skills, including: the ability to identify, evaluate, and formulate effective advocacy strategies and tactics; and the ability to develop common practitioner tools, such as concise briefing and messaging materials used in advocacy initiatives.We will focus on reinforcing skills of concise and effective written and oral argument through: 1) Socratic method class sessions; 2) discussion and critical evaluations of assigned readings; 3) brief written assignments focused on direct and concise communication of messaging and supporting proof points.
>>
>> Course Structure
>>
>> Our first class on January 15 will include a detailed description of the course structure and requirements. The class on January 22 will focus on a discussion with an experienced advocate anda former elected official. The purpose of this class is to explore some common roles, responsibilities, and experiences among practitioners and consumers of advocacy. The heart of our course will be five “case studies” focused on a series of global events and policy problems that illustrate various perspectives on advocacy.
>>
>> Each case will be covered over the course of two class sessionsas follows:
>>
>> •Session One: A brief introduction to frame the issue, followed by a group discussion of the topic, basedprimarily on assigned readings. These sessions will be interactive and participation by the entire group is expected. Introduction of additional readings and research by students is welcome. Students will submit a one-page issue briefing as part of their preparation for these sessions (please see “Course Requirements”).
>>
>> •Session Two: This portion of the case study will feature outside guests who have special expertise or first-hand experience with our topic. These sessions will be interactive and constructive participation is expected.
>> -- Katie Dodge
>> Rosemont Seneca Partners
>> 202-333-1880
>>
>>> On Mar 17, 2014, at 6:18 PM, "Wirkkala, Julie A" <WirkkalaJA@state.gov> wrote:
>>>
>>> Katie – can you tell us what you want S to talk about?
>>>
>>> From: Katie Dodge [mailto:kdodge@rosemontseneca.com]
>>> Sent: Friday, March 14, 2014 4:55 PM
>>> To: Wirkkala, Julie A
>>> Cc: Wade, David E; Natter, John H
>>> Subject: Re: Tuesday's Class for Georgetown
>>>
>>> I just spoke to Hunter. Let's see if this makes sense and can work - Plan to hold the class at State regardless of whether Secretary Kerry is in town or away.
>>>
>>> David, Hunter would like to know if you could suggest an interesting and appropriate person to stand in to cover the topic of Syria?
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Katie
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 4:10 PM, Wirkkala, Julie A <WirkkalaJA@state.gov> wrote:
>>> Thank you David – we just connected via phone!
>>>
>>> Katie – per our conversation, let’s tough base Monday morning, about the possibility of making this happen Tuesday evening, per the original plan. As I mentioned, in case this does not work out, and Hunter is interested in scheduling another day while class is in session during April, I believe we could get scheduled one of those days in mid-April.
>>>
>>> Look forward to touching base either this weekend, or Monday,
>>> Julie
>>>
>>> From: Wade, David E
>>> Sent: Friday, March 14, 2014 3:59 PM
>>> To: 'kdodge@rosemontseneca.com'; Wirkkala, Julie A; Natter, John H
>>> Subject: Re: Tuesday's Class for Georgetown
>>>
>>> Thanks Katie: I'm adding Julie and John. So far so good -- always a possibility that over the weekend something changes and we learn that the Secretary has to travel -- but so far we think he will still be in Washington. Julie and John are terrific and they'll know what information we'll need for the students so they can get inside the building.
>>> Best,
>>> David
>>>
>>> From: Katie Dodge [mailto:kdodge@rosemontseneca.com]
>>> Sent: Friday, March 14, 2014 03:56 PM
>>> To: Wade, David E
>>> Subject: Tuesday's Class for Georgetown
>>>
>>> Hello Mr. Wade,
>>>
>>> I am checking in per Hunter's request to see if everything is all set for Tuesday's class with Secretary Kerry. Do you need anything from him or the students (ss# etc.)? I am happy to help. Please let me know.
>>>
>>> Thank you.
>>>
>>> --
>>> Katie Dodge
>>> Executive Assistant/ Office Manager
>>> Rosemont Seneca Partners
>>> 1010 Wisconsin Ave., NW, #705
>>> Washington, DC 20007
>>> 202-333-1880
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Katie Dodge
>>> Executive Assistant/ Office Manager
>>> Rosemont Seneca Partners
>>> 1010 Wisconsin Ave., NW, #705
>>> Washington, DC 20007
>>> 202-333-188