EMAIL DETAILS

Thanks, Tom. Let us take a look and see if we can be helpful. Best, Eric


Eric D. Schwerin
Rosemont Seneca Advisors, LLC
2900 K Street, NW
Suite 507
Washington, DC 20007
(202) 333-1880
eschwerin@rosemontseneca.com <x-msg://59/eschwerin@obblaw.com>
P Consider the environment before printing this email.

WE’VE MOVED: PLEASE NOTE OUR NEW ADDRESS ABOVE

> On Apr 25, 2017, at 8:48 AM, Thomas Creal <t_creal@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> Eric and Hunter,
>
> This might be of interest. The matter that I am working on is the MUS matter for some of the defendants including Jacques de Groote, the former President of the World Bank. The case is sitting in the hands of Swiss Supreme Court as of yesterday. This is the case I need help from people that share my views.
>
> My view is if there was money laundering or fraud then the banks should have been prosecuted as well, and if the convictions are upheld then the banks are exposed for their failures in a civil world. I have attached the final letter filed by the attorneys for one of the defendants that supports the legal basis. Thus, the courts should consider no jail time, return most of the frozen funds and close it out forever.
>
> I also heard back that no Suspicious Activity Reports were filed by the banks, which indicates that the banks saw no wrongdoing. I know you are very busy, but if time I ask that you please review the summary below and share my views accordingly, specifically with people who can share such views in Switzerland. There are funds for fees too!
>
> 1. This is the film I sent before regarding this case, which is pretty informative. The trailer can be found at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bFY80TlDG3E <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bFY80TlDG3E>
>
> 2. As I have served as the Sanctions Expert for the United Nations re: Charles Taylor war crime profiteering and worked with the World Bank and IMF during de Groote's tenure, I was asked to conduct a high level independent assessment of this case.
>
> 3. I opined that there is no support for a money laundering claim, only optics, and as a claim for money laundering why were the ten Swiss banks not included in the prosecution.
>
> 4. I was subsequently asked by high level political leaders in the EU and the Czech Republic if I could voice my opinion with a degree of credibility and reasonableness.
>
> 5. The matter sits with the Federal Supreme Court of Switzerland in Lausanne. It is not my position to discuss any parts of the legal arguments. I only wish to present the view of the banks roles and potential exposure.
>
> 6. Federal Court adjourns May 29, 2017. Thus, a decision is forthcoming.
>
> Thank you.
>
> Tom
>
> Thomas Creal, CPA
> Former U.N. Panel Expert &
> Lead Expert for Task Force 2010 in Afghanistan
> www.HunterForensics.com <http://www.hunterforensics.com/>
> www.Eva2020.net <http://www.eva2020.net/>
>
> <SWISS Observations au TF_eng.pdf>