EMAIL DETAILS
SUBJECT:
Re: BHR Hanson and Dickson
PRI: NORMAL
FROM:
M
mleonard@thorntonai.com
DATE:
2015-03-24 16:16:14
MSG_ID:
<CAAfHxR5U_5+cZkpWRP1yLAew+bTL_imeeWta_OHHpiYNjZkwrw@mail.gmail.com>
RECIPIENTS:
TO:
J
James Bulger
<jbulger@thorntonai.com>
CC:
D
Devon Archer
<darcher@rosemontcapital.com>
H
Hunter Biden
<hbiden@rosemontseneca.com>
CONTENT:
TEXT: YES |
HTML: YES
PROCESSED
All, Below please find the dial-in information for the conference call today at 3PM EST. Hunter, if you need a dial-in code for somewhere else other than the US just let me know and I'll send it. US dial-in: 1-866-692-3158 Passcode: 3428128 If you have any questions please let me know. Best, Mike On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 11:49 AM, James Bulger <jbulger@thorntonai.com> wrote: > Devon thank you > I will have Lenny send around a call in number Where is HB? In the US > or abroad? His location changes the dial in number we send out to him > Lenny has been added now to this email chain in order to streamline > communications > Talk at 3 pm Nee York time today > Jimmy > > On Tuesday, March 24, 2015, Devon Archer <darcher@rosemontcapital.com> > wrote: > >> Yes >> >> Devon D. Archer >> 646 436 3745 >> >> On Mar 24, 2015, at 11:34 AM, James Bulger <jbulger@thorntonai.com> >> wrote: >> >> Does 3 o'clock work today for a quick call? >> Jimmy >> >> On Tuesday, March 24, 2015, Devon Archer <darcher@rosemontcapital.com> >> wrote: >> >>> Me as well. >>> >>> Devon D. Archer >>> 646 436 3745 >>> >>> On Mar 24, 2015, at 7:51 AM, James Bulger <jbulger@thorntonai.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>> Free any time after. 2 today. >>> >>> On Tuesday, March 24, 2015, Hunter Biden <hbiden@rosemontseneca.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Let me know a good time for tomorrow. >>>> >>>> RHB >>>> 202.333.1880 >>>> >>>> On Mar 23, 2015, at 5:07 PM, James Bulger <jbulger@thorntonai.com> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>> Hunter >>>> >>>> I am concerned about what happens if we win the Hanson deal Saw no >>>> sense in prematurely ringing the alarm in light of the fact we still I have >>>> no knowledge of exactly what a success means here to BHR. >>>> >>>> We have a problem with Jonathan and his team on a number of fronts >>>> >>>> A fix is not easy but if we hope to get BHR moving forward we had >>>> better get a plan in place. >>>> >>>> Do you guys have time for a call before Wednesday mornings Aleris >>>> call? I know you are both out of town but a half hour call prior to our >>>> next conversation with BHR would help us handle the Aleris call . Lay some >>>> ground rules down for the crew in Beijing >>>> >>>> You guys have time tomorrow for a quick chat? >>>> Jimmy >>>> >>>> On Monday, March 23, 2015, Hunter Biden <hbiden@rosemontseneca.com> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Jimmy- >>>>> I couldn't agree more. What I don't understand is why they wouldn't >>>>> want us directly involved. I understand after 10 years of this the cultural >>>>> differences blah, blah... But, in this case it defies all reason and logic. >>>>> It's almost as if they are trying to keep us away from the deal. After our >>>>> last board meeting where we expressly asked to be included I followed up >>>>> with emails asking for information about the company to see if we had any >>>>> connections to the board etc... And heard nothing. Another concern is that >>>>> they do buy a US company and offshore it and we are caught blindsided by >>>>> negative press. Anyway- we have to begin to change their behavior for this >>>>> to work. >>>>> >>>>> RHB >>>>> 202.333.1880 >>>>> >>>>> On Mar 23, 2015, at 3:21 PM, James Bulger <jbulger@thorntonai.com> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Gentlemen, >>>>> >>>>> I am sending you this brief note about the car parts manufacturer, >>>>> code named the Hanson (AVIC is co-investor) deal in order for you to get an >>>>> understanding of how I think we "might" help BHR management. >>>>> >>>>> During our call with Xin today (which neither Jonathan nor anyone else >>>>> from BHR besides Xin joined) we learned that BHR/AVIC lost the Dickson bid >>>>> to a Japanese firm. If you recall this was a bid on another auto parts >>>>> manufacturer that BHR was very keen on winning. We've been briefed for >>>>> months about how the Dickson deal was coming along and, when I've had a >>>>> chance, I've volunteered the American sides' assistance in order to help >>>>> with that deal. This was often met with nods and words of approval by the >>>>> BHR team but no real effort was made to seek our help. Well when we stopped >>>>> hearing about this deal recently I feared the worst and now today we have >>>>> had it confirmed by a subordinate of Jonathan's in an off-handed comment on >>>>> a conference call that our bid was not accepted and that the deal had >>>>> died... >>>>> >>>>> Unfortunately this pattern of behavior is more of the same from the >>>>> BHR side. >>>>> >>>>> Now I point that out just because, while BHR lost the Dickson deal, >>>>> there is another auto-parts deal that is ongoing and that is the Hanson >>>>> project. We learned today on the phone call that the final binding >>>>> offer on the Hanson deal is due on April 6th and three other >>>>> competitors remain. Xin believed this project could close as early as May >>>>> if our bid was accepted. Xin also mentioned that AVIC is very keen on >>>>> winning the Hanson deal especially since we lost the Dickson bid. >>>>> >>>>> During previous calls and meetings in Beijing I learned that Xinzhong >>>>> has been working on this deal and he has spent weeks in Detroit with the >>>>> AVIC team reviewing documents and interviewing Hanson executives generally >>>>> conducting DD. >>>>> >>>>> I have tried many times to get information regarding this project, but >>>>> in true Chinese fashion information is not readily shared with us. This >>>>> despite the fact that the seller is based in the USA and that the bidding >>>>> process is being conducted by the seller's investment bank whom we might >>>>> have direct connections to. However, this is a very large deal in dollar >>>>> terms and after the SINOPEC snafu closing a large deal in April would be >>>>> very beneficial to BHR. >>>>> >>>>> The seller is based in the Detroit area. At this time in the process >>>>> it might be too late to help BHR from the US side particularly in light of >>>>> the fact that there is a bidding process being conducted by an Investment >>>>> Bank on behalf of the seller. >>>>> >>>>> It is my belief that I and perhaps one or both of you might still be >>>>> able to assist in the process. For example, having a large Chinese entity >>>>> such as AVIC trying to purchase a large manufacturing entity in the US >>>>> might be disconcerting to local stakeholders such as Unions and local >>>>> elected officials concerned about job losses to an overseas buyer. In order >>>>> to mitigate such valid concerns it would be wise for me to meet local >>>>> elected officials (through SLLF contacts) and brief them on our plans for >>>>> the business post purchase. At the very least having us associated with the >>>>> buyer would help allay some fears in the mind of the seller and other stake >>>>> holders. Consider for a moment that one of the other 3 bidders is a US >>>>> based company. It is plausible then that they are prodding the seller to >>>>> stay onshore etc..... The other 3 bidders have not been disclosed to me and >>>>> yes I have asked in the past for their names. Perhaps there is a consultant >>>>> hired by Hanson on the Federal level, if there is such a consultant then >>>>> perhaps he is friendly and perhaps he should be made aware we all are >>>>> stakeholders in this endeavor, that would be good information for Hanson >>>>> (the seller) to have in hand. >>>>> >>>>> One of BHR's strong points is that we have excellent partners/owners >>>>> in the US. Here we have a situation where BHR coupled with AVIC is bidding >>>>> to buy a large US based firm and the US based owners/ Board members of BHR >>>>> are kept in the dark. >>>>> >>>>> I believe we could have helped a company we OWN win a significant >>>>> piece of business. Perhaps it is too late in the process, and maybe BHR >>>>> management has a very good reason for not involving any of us in the >>>>> process but here are a few final thoughts to consider: >>>>> >>>>> #1. I don't know how the deal is structured so I don't even know how >>>>> BHR gets compensated. Clearly our Fund is not fully funded so we likely >>>>> will not invest alongside AVIC, unless of course this is a deal where if we >>>>> win it Gouxin would come into our fund as a large LP. >>>>> >>>>> #2. I'm pretty sure Lazard is acting as the BHR /AVIC banking >>>>> consultant. I know you guys have relationships over at Lazard. I think >>>>> Lazard would be wise enough to know how, or if we as individuals, might be >>>>> able to assist in this process. Do you think it might be wise to speak to >>>>> someone at Lazard? With the full knowledge of Jonathan and management of >>>>> course, not looking to upset the apple cart here. Lazard should at least be >>>>> made aware that we have an interest in helping. >>>>> >>>>> #3. Without seeing a budget and projections from Management I have no >>>>> way to determine what fee etc.... This Hanson deal actually means to BHR. >>>>> Clearly though a win is a win, and Burnham for instance, would be happy to >>>>> mention a win other than SINOPEC while they are out fundraising. >>>>> >>>>> I hope you take the time to read my note. I am using this deal as an >>>>> example of how our management team needs to open up the communications. >>>>> There is no excuse for the 3 of us not to be involved at some level in the >>>>> Hanson project. We own BHR, furthermore we want it to succeed as much as >>>>> anyone. The BHR management team has kept us in the dark. It troubles me >>>>> that the management team at BHR never asked for our thoughts, advice or >>>>> insight while chasing a buy out of a very large US firm. >>>>> >>>>> I suggest that we all have a call about this before the BHR >>>>> conference call on Wednesday so that we can make sure that we as Americans >>>>> are all on the same page. Let me know when you guys are free. >>>>> >>>>> Thanks, >>>>> Jimmy >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> James J. Bulger >>>>> Chairman >>>>> Thornton Group LLC >>>>> 14 Beacon Street, Suite 804A >>>>> Boston, MA 02108 >>>>> Office tel: 617.248.9440 >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> James J. Bulger >>>> Chairman >>>> Thornton Group LLC >>>> 14 Beacon Street, Suite 804A >>>> Boston, MA 02108 >>>> Office tel: 617.248.9440 >>>> >>>> >>> >>> -- >>> James J. Bulger >>> Chairman >>> Thornton Group LLC >>> 14 Beacon Street, Suite 804A >>> Boston, MA 02108 >>> Office tel: 617.248.9440 >>> >>> >> >> -- >> James J. Bulger >> Chairman >> Thornton Group LLC >> 14 Beacon Street, Suite 804A >> Boston, MA 02108 >> Office tel: 617.248.9440 >> >> > > -- > James J. Bulger > Chairman > Thornton Group LLC > 14 Beacon Street, Suite 804A > Boston, MA 02108 > Office tel: 617.248.9440 > -- Michael R. Leonard Vice President, Operations Department Thornton Group LLC 14 Beacon Street, Suite 804A Boston, MA 02108 Office: 617-248-9440 Mobile: 781-454-922
METADATA:
THREAD:
INDEX:
Adhhnq2oBEpxeVijScO1mE7kQI/ifg==
REFERENCES:
REPLY_TO:
<CANzY62_9JKgZUP=J0_g_5YVWU8=mhS7UMn=HPprGG6Eywb9F3w@mail.gmail.com>
REFS:
<0DCCB3AD-8AA5-4149-96EC-9272063F6B02@rosemontseneca.com>
<80777018-3E4F-4639-9709-C5AE48FA2FDF@rosemontseneca.com>
<258A85BB-D0A3-4C7C-9E31-60028B46B0C4@rosemontcapital.com>
<F084EAF2-A70E-4C3E-87F5-15E5FE10112E@rosemontcapital.com>
<CANzY62-Wj+JCqrH=tuG=RmdoEQi5izRhU4uDD81X9JH0O9b7=A@mail.gmail.com>
<CANzY6293PwSLXnf3ZrMZhfOZeiLnu4VBruO_8tuMbfQnTm8z-g@mail.gmail.com>
<CANzY629jnwenhqjdTnMmn5OPHx27DMMWhRX3fRh0ztyTo_MHjA@mail.gmail.com>
<CANzY62_9JKgZUP=J0_g_5YVWU8=mhS7UMn=HPprGG6Eywb9F3w@mail.gmail.com>
<CANzY62_bKx-4PYD=5ch0C0BZZ4AY4FTrmA+xUu2Mj9tQcE7D_w@mail.gmail.com>