EMAIL DETAILS
SUBJECT:
RE: Per our conversations re: Press Statements
PRI: NORMAL
FROM:
S
smancinelli@ainbanklaw.com
DATE:
2017-03-31 17:47:12
MSG_ID:
<05C361CDDCDC5C4281D64FB1EA4B86B7A33E38F6@SMCAEX01.smcalaw.com>
RECIPIENTS:
TO:
E
Eric Schwerin
<eschwerin@rosemontseneca.com>
H
Hunter Biden
<hbiden@rosemontseneca.com>
CONTENT:
TEXT: YES |
HTML: YES
PROCESSED
I am on board with this. As you know, I thought it made more sense to do this when the divorce was finalized as the conclusion of this story all together but I don’t feel that strongly about it. From: Eric Schwerin [mailto:eschwerin@rosemontseneca.com] Sent: Friday, March 31, 2017 1:22 PM To: SMancinelli; Hunter Biden Subject: Per our conversations re: Press Statements So everyone is in the loop please confirm that this all makes sense. Hunter, weigh in if I got anything wrong. 1) Hunter signs off on his press statement. Only edit Sarah and I suggested was to change the word “breakdown” to “end” or “conclusion” in reference to “breakdown of my marriage”. 2) Sarah lets Rebekah know that Hunter would like to send the two statements to Roxanne Roberts as an exclusive and tell Roxanne that neither Hunter or or Kathleen will have any further comment beyond their statements. The strategy put forward by the press people was that Roxanne was more likely to refrain from writing a story or write a more favorable if she got an exclusive. 3) Hunter would like to do this as soon as possible. Thoughts? Eric D. Schwerin Rosemont Seneca Advisors, LLC 2900 K Street, NW Suite 507 Washington, DC 20007 (202) 333-1880 eschwerin@rosemontseneca.com<x-msg://59/eschwerin@obblaw.com> P Consider the environment before printing this email. WE’VE MOVED: PLEASE NOTE OUR NEW ADDRESS ABOVE
METADATA:
THREAD:
TOPIC:
Per our conversations re: Press Statements
INDEX:
AQHSqkM+SeQHIn1BWkickO2J1C4a+aGvOPdg
REFERENCES:
REPLY_TO:
<D850CEC1-C747-4F2C-BA33-CB529F1C3F42@rosemontseneca.com>
REFS:
<D850CEC1-C747-4F2C-BA33-CB529F1C3F42@rosemontseneca.com>