EMAIL DETAILS
SUBJECT:
Re: Privileged and Confidential
PRI: NORMAL
FROM:
V
v.pozharskyi.ukraine@gmail.com
DATE:
2014-06-25 16:48:06
MSG_ID:
<CAHHQ8gCtC1C=xfB1YzZCLb61OFbLRhnBz+i4eoAu_jyvb9k+Bw@mail.gmail.com>
RECIPIENTS:
TO:
A
Alan Apter
<alan.apter@burisma.com>
D
Devon Archer
<darcher@rosemontseneca.com>
H
Hunter Biden
<hbiden@rosemontseneca.com>
H
Heather King
<hking@bsfllp.com>
J
James McInerney
<jamie.mcinerney@fticonsulting.com>
L
Pacheco, Lawrence
<lawrence.pacheco@fticonsulting.com>
R
Toohey, Ryan
<ryan.toohey@fticonsulting.com>
CONTENT:
TEXT: YES |
HTML: YES
PROCESSED
Dear Heather, I am sorry for the confusion that might have arisen. UBO in our chart means the ultimate beneficial owner, who is Nikolay. Therefore, Burisma is 100% owned by Brociti and Brociti is 100% owned by Nikolay and you are very correct in saying that he is thus an indirect owner of Burisma. Best, Vadim 2014-06-25 17:38 GMT+03:00 Heather King <hking@bsfllp.com>: > Vadim – Can you please clarify for me what the ownership structure is > between Burisma Holdings Limited, Brociti Investments Limited and UBO? I > have a chart that you sent me which shows that Burisma is 100% owned by > Brociti and that Brociti is 100% owned by UBO. However, one of the Cyprus > filings seems to conflict with this. It lists NZ as the owner of Brociti. > I just want to be sure we get this all down precisely, and then we can > choose when to be inprecise (for example, it is fine to say that Nikolai is > the “owner” of Burisma but the precise answer seems to be that he is not – > rather, he is the indirect owner of Burisma, either because he owns 100% of > Brociti or because he owns 100% of UBO, which owns Brociti). > > > > *Heather King, Esq.* > > *Partner* > > > *BOIES, SCHILLER & FLEXNER LLP **5301 Wisconsin Avenue, N.W.* > *Washington, D.C. 20015* > > *202-274-1129 <202-274-1129> (Phone) 202-237-6131 <202-237-6131> (Fax)* > > *hking@bsfllp.com <hking@bsfllp.com>* > > > > ------------------------------ > The information contained in this electronic message is confidential > information intended only for the use of the named recipient(s) and may > contain information that, among other protections, is the subject of > attorney-client privilege, attorney work product or exempt from disclosure > under applicable law. If the reader of this electronic message is not the > named recipient, or the employee or agent responsible to deliver it to the > named recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, > distribution, copying or other use of this communication is strictly > prohibited and no privilege is waived. If you have received this > communication in error, please immediately notify the sender by replying to > this electronic message and then deleting this electronic message from your > computer. [v.1]
METADATA:
THREAD:
INDEX:
AdhhnsZpCZiW3jFlSmyQuFoIUimE1g==
REFERENCES:
REPLY_TO:
<0CB8E663099EB942AE17613795EEE5949BA6597CCA@wasexch04>
REFS:
<0CB8E663099EB942AE17613795EEE5949BA6597CCA@wasexch04>