EMAIL DETAILS
SUBJECT:
Re: GS agreement thoughts
PRI: NORMAL
FROM:
W
wlee@rosemontseneca.com
DATE:
2014-03-21 02:40:21
MSG_ID:
<F7D20B78-4D9E-4008-A8C1-E3E80004F6A5@rosemontseneca.com>
RECIPIENTS:
TO:
J
John DeLoche
<jdeloche@rosemontseneca.com>
CC:
D
Devon Archer
<darcher@rosemontseneca.com>
E
Eric Schwerin
<eschwerin@rosemontseneca.com>
H
Hunter Biden
<hbiden@rosemontseneca.com>
N
Neil Callahan
<ncallahan@rosemontseneca.com>
R
Rob Walker
<rwalker@rosemontseneca.com>
CONTENT:
TEXT: YES |
HTML: NO
PROCESSED
Devon, nice job on the math! If GS puts $15m to Counsyl at series D under the same term as last round secondary, the carry interest could be more difficult to hurdle over, comparing to the last secondary round. GS going into our 2/20 fund is the way to go, and the benefit for RSTP far outweighs anything. I completely agree on having them in the fund and no fees on the co-investment. William Lee Rosemont Seneca Technology Partners (RSTP) Sent from my iPhone > On Mar 20, 2014, at 7:15 PM, John DeLoche <jdeloche@rosemontseneca.com> wrote: > > Yes, that's the logic. Just an idea now. We will see where it goes. Their preference may be the full $15 in a side fund. We may be able to get the full $15 plus a fund commitment. > > Sent from my iPhone > >> On Mar 20, 2014, at 7:05 PM, Devon Archer <darcher@rosemontseneca.com> wrote: >> >> So we would basically give up $150k annually and the carry on the $15mm in order for them to come into the fund for $2.5-$5mm type range. >> >> At $5mm you've already replaced $100k of annual revenue. >> >> The carry portion a little more to swallow because if Counsel does what we think that's several million. >> >> Probably a smart move still though in that the goal and real wealth creation will be a result of raising and investing the fund 2, 3, 4 and 5. Goldman as an anchor helps start that story. >> >>> On Mar 20, 2014, at 9:34 PM, John DeLoche <jdeloche@rosemontseneca.com> wrote: >>> >>> Just got off a call with GS. They gave approval to lob in the term sheet to Counsyl today. They will put in $15mm into a vehicle on same terms as our prior deal. >>> >>> I floated the idea of them committing to the fund directly and then investing on a no fee no carry basis the balance. It would help us a lot more if we could tell people GS is paying us 2 and 20 in our main fund, even for a nominal amount. Doing so in this deal could be economically better to them but allow us to credibly say they are in the fund. >>> >>> We agreed to figure it out tmw in person either before or after the Counsyl DD meeting. >>> >>> Let me know your thoughts. >>> >>> Would be great for all who are in the Bay Area tmw to join for the Counsyl meeting and lab tour (12:30-2:30). >>> >>> Best, >>> >>> John >>> >>> Sent from my iPhone
METADATA:
THREAD:
INDEX:
AdhhntWL9MUJyzieTkmWr2ZyH+RFpw==
REFERENCES:
REPLY_TO:
<EBE7F7E1-9DF9-4D25-93D5-E9E0DF2718B5@rosemontseneca.com>
REFS:
<7EB0E2BD-4E46-4EF4-9086-7D1193587D2D@rosemontseneca.com>
<DF4F324A-8A7D-4C4E-A88A-14DF3B236EDB@rosemontseneca.com>
<EBE7F7E1-9DF9-4D25-93D5-E9E0DF2718B5@rosemontseneca.com>