EMAIL DETAILS
SUBJECT:
Re: GS
PRI: NORMAL
FROM:
D
darcher@rosemontseneca.com
DATE:
2014-03-30 21:35:16
MSG_ID:
<CC6B30F5-26D1-4791-AC93-EB49976E6197@rosemontseneca.com>
RECIPIENTS:
TO:
H
Hunter Biden
<hbiden@rosemontseneca.com>
CONTENT:
TEXT: YES |
HTML: YES
PROCESSED
Roger that. Will do. Devon Archer 646 436 3745 > On Mar 30, 2014, at 5:34 PM, Hunter Biden <hbiden@rosemontseneca.com> wrote: > > Interesting- ask Neil what his take is on what Julia said. I didn't get the impression that it was still a possibility in the sort term. Maybe I misunderstood. > > RHB > 202.333.1880 > >> On Mar 30, 2014, at 1:28 PM, Devon Archer <darcher@rosemontseneca.com> wrote: >> >> FYI >> >> ---------- Forwarded message ---------- >> From: John DeLoche <jdeloche@rosemontseneca.com> >> Date: Sun, Mar 30, 2014 at 1:26 PM >> Subject: Re: GS >> To: Devon Archer <darcher@rosemontseneca.com> >> >> >> They are putting another minimum 15mm into Counsyl through our fund. We will have a total of at least $40mm that we are managing from them. They will revisit blind pool after this next step with Counsyl which should be done by end of April. I expect them to come into blind pool as well you can say they have committed 40mm to RSTP and we expect them to increase it. >> >> Sent from my iPhone >> >> > On Mar 30, 2014, at 9:56 AM, Devon Archer <darcher@rosemontseneca.com> wrote: >> > >> > Where do we stand on GS on the blind pool potential commitment? I either want to dance around it with KZ or be firm in language. >> > >> > Devon Archer >> > 646 436 3745 >>=2
METADATA:
THREAD:
INDEX:
Adhhnte47BeUskkzTWyWmstUipQE0g==
REFERENCES:
REPLY_TO:
<64AE1E3F-5A51-4B1F-9316-876DBD6F9CA1@rosemontseneca.com>
REFS:
<64AE1E3F-5A51-4B1F-9316-876DBD6F9CA1@rosemontseneca.com>
<A62D4A8B-0D44-41E5-963A-2CD795832D62@rosemontseneca.com>
<DA80DABC-BF0D-41F5-A966-6F1AC67B6AA3@rosemontseneca.com>
<CANxoitOss2081NxUUhei0Htt0Amwk2k7vdVducEA4vkiKXPxFg@mail.gmail.com>