EMAIL DETAILS
SUBJECT:
TOUGH DAY ON THE STREET
PRI: NORMAL
FROM:
E
eschwerin@rosemontseneca.com
DATE:
2010-06-25 12:31:46
MSG_ID:
<AANLkTilyCU4knD3IcUcUWMLoJV-9g-AoPkWCqN6lFC7G@mail.gmail.com>
RECIPIENTS:
TO:
H
Hunter Biden
<hbiden@rosemontseneca.com>
CONTENT:
TEXT: YES |
HTML: YES
PROCESSED
TOUGH DAY ON THE STREET – Wall Street executives and lobbyists threw up their hands in exasperation early this morning after appearing to get mostly routed on the two issues they fought hardest in financial reform: a strict “Volcker rule” limiting proprietary trading and the amendment from Sen. Blanche Lincoln (D-Ark.) forcing the spin-off of lucrative derivatives trading into separately capitalized subsidiaries. Instead of the last minute save on these issues they hoped would come from the Treasury Department, lobbyists suggested administration officials pushed in the other direction, for very tough language in both areas. The moderate Democrats and members of the New York delegation the banks were counting on as bulwarks also did not seem able to beat back the tide for the stronger language. The banks did win the ability to invest 3 percent of their equity in hedge funds and private equity funds but that was seen as somewhat small comfort given the larger impact of the final product. The 3 percent provision was necessary to win support from Sen. Scott Brown (R-Mass.), whose state is home to big asset management companies that want to be able to invest small amounts in alternative asset classes. The provision would presumably allow banks to keep managing hedge funds and private equity funds, though with little of their own money invested. One big fear among banks executives was a late change to the “Volcker rule” they said could significantly impair their ability to make markets in a variety of securities to facilitate client transactions. The executives pointed to language saying such activity could only be related to "reasonably expected near term demands of clients, customers, or counterparties." The executives believe this could curtail the ability of banks to build large, longer-term inventories of stocks, bonds and other securities that clients might eventually want to buy and sell to hedge their own risks. "If you can't facilitate for clients, we can't properly hedge risk and build inventory for clients," one bank official said. "It will greatly inhibit marketing making by filtering our risk-taking business model to an interpretation of intent." -- Eric D. Schwerin Rosemont Seneca Partners (202) 333-1880 eschwerin@rosemontseneca.co
METADATA:
THREAD:
INDEX:
AdhhnvFdabKx2iXKRUGp/ysNaAwTGA==