EMAIL DETAILS
SUBJECT:
Re: Look and feel
PRI: NORMAL
FROM:
E
eschwerin@rosemontseneca.com
DATE:
2010-06-18 03:22:31
MSG_ID:
<AANLkTill0Ne-6GGXdvAEyttEBymXpwUyq2s6MSE1-njV@mail.gmail.com>
RECIPIENTS:
TO:
A
Alexandra Stanton
<acstanton@yahoo.com>
CC:
H
hbiden@rosemontseneca.com
J
Joan Peugh
<jpeugh@rosemontseneca.com>
CONTENT:
TEXT: YES |
HTML: YES
PROCESSED
Great. Wasn't sure when we talked if you were saying Ianuzzi would attend or find the right person. Randi knows best. On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 11:10 PM, Alexandra Stanton <acstanton@yahoo.com>wrote: > I think this is a fine goal and format. It'll both shorten the evening and > make the experience more direct and communal for the attendees -- laudable > on both points. We may, however, come across another couple of folks we > think should be included -- prospective clients, for example. So if we need > expand slightly, I for one won't be concerned. > > Iannuzzi wont attend, Eric -- he'll pick the right person. Randi will > handle. > > > > > --- On *Thu, 6/17/10, Eric Schwerin <eschwerin@rosemontseneca.com>* wrote: > > > From: Eric Schwerin <eschwerin@rosemontseneca.com> > Subject: Re: Look and feel > To: "Alexandra Stanton" <acstanton@yahoo.com> > Cc: hbiden@rosemontseneca.com, "Joan Peugh" <jpeugh@rosemontseneca.com> > Date: Thursday, June 17, 2010, 2:30 PM > > > Just wanted to send a quick email to keep everyone in the loop. > > Hunter and I talked briefly this morning on this and we were trying to > think through how best to accomplish our goals on this and make it something > people would enjoy and want to come back to. > > He thought that we may want to limit the numbers even further and eliminate > the "formal" remarks part of the program. > > So, make it around 12 people max and do it around one big table. Start > with a cocktail reception (30-45 minutes maybe) and then go right to dinner. > Then for dinner conduct a discussion around the table. We should use the > "Lady Bird Johnson Rule" - there should only be one conversation around the > table at one time. Make the topic a little broader - "the economy" (which > will certainly focus on the struggles the participants are facing - be it > state budget deficits, pension gaps, etc., but also allow the investment > folks to talk about their prospective on the domestic and global economy. > Nick Rohatyn can talk about the global economy, Izzy can talk about it from > his perspective and we can get someone like a Charlie Ledley to talk about > it from his perspective and the Governor from his perspective. Have > everyone go around the table and say a few words to start things off and > then have a free flowing conversation. Obviously, if the Governor is there > we can have him kick things off if he is comfortable doing so. > > So, if we say a max of 4 RSP folks, we would have 8 other attendees. (We > may be able to go to 14 total depending on the table size - but wouldn't go > more than that.) > > Potential Attendees: > > Hunter > Chris > Arlene > Alex > Nick Rohatyn > Izzy Englander > Governor Paterson > Rep from Teachers Union per Randi Weingarten's suggestion (would this be > Ianuzzi himself or the pension fund head?) > Charlie Ledley > Joe Rocks (Trustee of PA Pension Fund) > 2-3 additional including possibly Greg Floyd of the Teamsters, a think tank > type, Kevin Lynch of Morgan Stanley (Arlene's suggestion) - we can decide > who to plug in. > > This makes it easier and a little less complicated on program. > > Hunter did this accurately reflect your thoughts? Alex, what do you think? > > > > > Eric D. Schwerin > Rosemont Seneca Partners, LLC > 1010 Wisconsin Ave., NW > Suite 705 > Washington, DC 20007 > (202) 333-1880 > eschwerin@rosemontseneca.com > *P** **Consider the environment before printing this email.* > > On Jun 17, 2010, at 9:12 AM, Alexandra Stanton wrote: > > Hunter, > > I see this as an intimate evening -- both in setting and in attendees. So, > re locale: a library setting, nice mouldings, attractive, with books, a > clubby feel -- for cocktails and possibly for a speaker to make some briefremarks -- moving then into an adjoining space for dinner, 2 round tables of > 10, also a small intimate space that both facilitates discussion and doesnt > make folks feel like we've shrunk a ballroom. > > make sense? > > if so, then I think it's easy for any of us to get up, welcome folks, intro > a speaker, facilitate discussion, suggest we move into the next room for > dinner, etc. I think the space is actually impt re setting a tone for our > clients: this is well thought thru, exclusive, they'll feel comfortable, if > they're not socially at ease generally we'll be able to intro them to enough > folks that they'll feel take care of. And with only 2 tables of 10, you can > not only see everyone at the table (as opp to a rectangular table) but you > can switch tables halfway through the meal to make all folks feel they've > have time with you. > > Your thoughts? > > A. > > > > --- On *Wed, 6/16/10, hbiden@rosemontseneca.com<http://mc/compose?to=hbiden@rosemontseneca.com> > <hbiden@rosemontseneca.com<http://mc/compose?to=hbiden@rosemontseneca.com> > >* wrote: > > > From: hbiden@rosemontseneca.com<http://mc/compose?to=hbiden@rosemontseneca.com>< > hbiden@rosemontseneca.com <http://mc/compose?to=hbiden@rosemontseneca.com> > > > Subject: Re: Policy Dinner > To: "Eric Schwerin" <eschwerin@rosemontseneca.com<http://mc/compose?to=eschwerin@rosemontseneca.com> > > > Cc: "Alexandra Stanton" <acstanton@yahoo.com<http://mc/compose?to=acstanton@yahoo.com>>, > "Joan Peugh" <jpeugh@rosemontseneca.com<http://mc/compose?to=jpeugh@rosemontseneca.com> > > > Date: Wednesday, June 16, 2010, 2:39 PM > > Also reach out to Chaffe to see if he can suggest anyone from SEIU. What > about Karen Maza the general counsel from NYCERS. There is a club that I > went to on Upper East Side that was very cool that was relaxed and more > modern- Marc LoPresti will remember name of it. > > Also I think agenda will shape invite list. How do we see this working? Who > presents to whom- are there formal presentations- do we have discussion and > then a dinner or is it all one thing. How many people. You guys have > probably thought this all through so sorry for asking questions already > answered. > > Sent on the Sprint® Now Network from my BlackBerry® > ------------------------------ > *From: * Eric Schwerin <eschwerin@rosemontseneca.com<http://mc/compose?to=eschwerin@rosemontseneca.com>> > > *Date: *Wed, 16 Jun 2010 13:11:55 -0400 > *To: *Hunter Biden<hbiden@rosemontseneca.com<http://mc/compose?to=hbiden@rosemontseneca.com> > > > *Cc: *Alexandra Stanton<acstanton@yahoo.com<http://mc/compose?to=acstanton@yahoo.com>>; > Joan Peugh<jpeugh@rosemontseneca.com<http://mc/compose?to=jpeugh@rosemontseneca.com> > > > *Subject: *Policy Dinner > > Hunter- > > Alex and I had a talk today about our policy dinner on the 14th of July in > NY. Wanted to make sure you were OK with a few things we decided and get > your input. I cc:ed Alex so it is easier to get input to both of us. > > 1) We are confirming but at least Izzy Englander and Nick Rohatyn will be > attending. > 2) The theme of the dinner will be Pension Fund Unfunded Liabilities. > 3) Alex is going to reach out to Gov. Paterson to see if he can attend and > reach out to Randi Weingarten to see if either she can attend or if she > thinks it it more appropriate have the relevant head of the AFT's pension > fund attend. > 4) Should Alex consider reaching out to NY State Comptroller Napoli? She > knows his Chief of Staff well. I forgot to mention to Alex but I know you > wanted to invite Joe Rocks (Alex, he's a trustee on the PA State Pension > Fund). Should we reach out to Joe Rocks first? I think so, but let me know > your thoughts. > 5) Alex is looking at Midtown locations - mostly hotels but hotels that > have a intimate, library like feel. Not hotel ballrooms. > 6) We are going to reach out to Chris Chafe to see if he has some > suggestions. May be good to get someone from EPI (Jared Bernstein's old > shop) to come and talk about unfunded liabilities from a think tank > perspective. > > Hunter, do you agree with all of the above? Thoughts? We'll obviously > need more to fill out the guest list, but these are just our initial > thoughts. > > Best, > > Eric > > > > Eric D. Schwerin > Rosemont Seneca Partners, LLC > 1010 Wisconsin Ave., NW > Suite 705 > Washington, DC 20007 > (202) 333-1880 > eschwerin@rosemontseneca.com > *P** **Consider the environment before printing this email.* > > > -- Eric D. Schwerin Rosemont Seneca Partners (202) 333-1880 eschwerin@rosemontseneca.co
METADATA:
THREAD:
INDEX:
AdhhnvFeVhqog+E+RXuk+iGiGMDlRg==
REFERENCES:
REPLY_TO:
<337787.12584.qm@web37905.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
REFS:
<337787.12584.qm@web37905.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
<091B712C-34C0-4EF2-AA24-33B6BE48748A@rosemontseneca.com>