EMAIL DETAILS
SUBJECT:
USGLC 2016 Election Analysis
PRI: NORMAL
FROM:
L
liz.schrayer@usglc.org
DATE:
2016-11-10 01:17:43
MSG_ID:
<8fefe6508201448ba3bec2e21ea5c25a@usglc.org>
RECIPIENTS:
TO:
H
Hunter Biden
<hbiden@rosemontseneca.com>
CONTENT:
TEXT: YES |
HTML: YES
PROCESSED
Hunter- Last night's unexpected election results sent shockwaves across our nation and world. While the election will bring significant change to the White House, the composition of the House and Senate remains largely the same - many USGLC allies and friends will be returning for the 115th Congress, and the new Members include loads of supportive voices. After meeting with nearly every incoming freshmen member of Congress and numerous meetings with President-elect Trump's campaign and Transition Team, we look forward to working with the new Administration and Congress to build on the bipartisan support for American global leadership through development and diplomacy. As we do after every election, here is our 2016 Election Analysis of what last night's results mean, including our top takeaways, profiles of the new Members, and a look at the transition. A quick snapshot is below. http://action.usglc.org/site/R?i=eH43YHVQfARKVkiD-hFC7A Click Here for the Full Report http://action.usglc.org/site/R?i=SB2HiOMBKQgYm2WXjEzB_A Best, Liz Liz Schrayer, USGLC After Tumultuous Election, Foreign Policy Direction Less Clear Bipartisan Congressional Support Remains Strong Get the USGLC's full 2016 Election Analysis http://action.usglc.org/site/R?i=zXp5Gyyo-wzVdyz6XcLAvA Here's our takeaways on foreign policy and Election 2016: 1. Foreign Policy a Top Issue. As voters headed to the polls, 4 out of 5 said that foreign policy was either "extremely important" or "very important" to their vote regardless of which presidential candidate they supported, not surprising given the growing humanitarian crises and instability in the world. However, with the historic closeness of the race, "foreign policy" likely meant something very different for many Trump and Clinton supporters. At the same time, the vast array of Congressional winners and their opponents ran campaigns on records that were supportive of U.S. engagement to solve global challenges. 2. U.S. Joins Rising Populist Tide Around the World. With that said, many pundits saw the unpredicted nature of Trump's victory as part of a rising nationalist tide against immigration, trade, and globalization. While the exact size and nature of this anti-engagement sentiment among some American voters is unknown, a portion of voters on the left and certainly the right were clearly drawn to an anti-trade and likely broader nativist message. Expect the anxiety around global economic issues and protectionism to endure. 3. Trump's Unconventional Foreign Policy Platform. After decades of GOP support for American engagement abroad, Trump's foreign policy positions countered traditional GOP foreign policy doctrine from challenging alliances to anti-trade rhetoric to his "America First" platform (a throwback to the original 1940s brand of isolationism). This led to significant rifts among GOP foreign policy stalwarts and sowed fears with allies overseas. Last night, Trump appeared to thread a needle between his "American interests first" campaign pledge and his words that America "will deal fairly with everyone... We will seek common ground, not hostility; partnership, not conflict." Eyes will be watching to see how the President-elect embraces Reagan's "peace through strength" approach and if he fills his cabinet with internationalist advisors like Senate Foreign Relations Chairman Bob Corker and National Security Transition Chair, former Congressman Mike Rogers. 4. Trump Unclear on Humanitarian and Foreign Assistance. Trump's global development agenda is less clear. In launching his campaign, he said we must "stop sending foreign aid to countries that hate us." Later, however, he said that America will "continue forever to play the role of peacemaker. We will always help save lives and indeed, humanity itself... We are a humanitarian nation." In a TV interview last April, he weighed in on our nation's humanitarian and foreign assistance programs noting that "if we don't help" countries facing disasters, then it would create "bigger problems." Yet, he pivoted back in a recent letter stating "the billions we spend on child survival, maternal and child health and food aid can and must do more to help impoverished nations become capable of taking care of themselves in the future." A key area to watch is who fills some of the key positions. 5. Pence a Likely Liaison to Congress. Vice President-elect Mike Pence is expected to be an important conduit between the White House and Congress, especially given his tenure in the House and friendship with Speaker Paul Ryan. A former House Foreign Affairs Committee member and noted religious conservative, Pence was a leading advocate of the President's Emergency Response for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR), calling it a "moral obligation" for the U.S. to lead in confronting the pandemic. However, even as a vocal supporter of humanitarian programs, his track record on actually funding these efforts is mixed but hopefully will shift. As Chairman of the Republican Study Committee, he supported proposals to drastically reduce or eliminate certain development agencies and programs. 6. Congressional Winners Committed to Global Engagement. Many USGLC friends and allies from both sides of the aisle will return to the House and Senate as champions of America's international affairs programs. Based on our briefings with more than 160 House and Senate candidates, the pro-engagement caucus will be strong. From Senator Marco Rubio (R-FL), who will return to the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, to in-coming Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer to new Senators Todd Young (IN-R) and Tammy Duckworth (IL-D) both veterans, the 115th Senate will be full of internationalists. In the House, watch for newly elected members Mike Gallagher (R-WI), a marine and former Senate Foreign Relations Committee staffer, along with Stephanie Murphy (D-FL) and Jim Banks (R-IN) to stake out pro-engagement platforms and committee assignments. 7. Foreign Assistance Not a Voting Issue. While the topic never emerged as a central issue on the national debate stage, foreign assistance was mentioned positively by winners and challengers on both sides of the aisle. One senator who won reelection proudly named global development legislation as one of his premier accomplishments. Out of several hundred television ads focused on foreign policy, Senator Rand Paul (R-KY) was the only candidate that ran anti-foreign assistance ads. 8. First 100 Days Inbox: Humanitarian Crises. Amidst a divided country and numerous domestic challenges, one area that has emerged as a consensus priority among candidates up and down the ballot is the need to address ongoing humanitarian crises, particularly in Syria. With more than 65 million people displaced around the world the highest number ever and three level-3 global emergencies, this will be a key area for the next Administration and Congress to work together. Get the USGLC's full 2016 Election Analysis http://action.usglc.org/site/R?i=nT_qZjw-cxRrRuzyDx2HCA The U.S. Global Leadership Coalition 1129 20th Street NW, Suite 600, Washington, DC 20036 Manage Subscriptions | Unsubscribe | USGLC.org http://action.usglc.org/site/R?i=pqFk2HBkw29rU4PegkuVyQ http://action.usglc.org/site/CO?i=q9abd5RFziDh6GhV73kwk4rNv6UQxy-C&cid=0 http://action.usglc.org/site/R?i=oyDQDpXdtQomg2LKIhs9Ew http://action.usglc.org/site/R?i=_Y7c7x47IQn12S1Y2juTbQ
METADATA:
THREAD:
INDEX:
AdhhnvJ9slplLRKuTD2rrx/a1kj5Cw==