Per our conversations re: Press Statements

SUBJECT:

PRI: NORMAL

FROM:

E

eschwerin@rosemontseneca.com

DATE:

2017-03-31 17:21:31

MSG_ID:

<D850CEC1-C747-4F2C-BA33-CB529F1C3F42@rosemontseneca.com>

RECIPIENTS:

TO:

H

Hunter Biden <hbiden@rosemontseneca.com>

S

Sarah E. Mancinelli <smancinelli@ainbanklaw.com>

CONTENT: TEXT: YES | HTML: YES

PROCESSED

So everyone is in the loop please confirm that this all makes sense. Hunter, weigh in if I got anything wrong.

1) Hunter signs off on his press statement. Only edit Sarah and I suggested was to change the word “breakdown” to “end” or “conclusion” in reference to “breakdown of my marriage”.

2) Sarah lets Rebekah know that Hunter would like to send the two statements to Roxanne Roberts as an exclusive and tell Roxanne that neither Hunter or or Kathleen will have any further comment beyond their statements. The strategy put forward by the press people was that Roxanne was more likely to refrain from writing a story or write a more favorable if she got an exclusive.

3) Hunter would like to do this as soon as possible.

Thoughts?


Eric D. Schwerin
Rosemont Seneca Advisors, LLC
2900 K Street, NW
Suite 507
Washington, DC 20007
(202) 333-1880
eschwerin@rosemontseneca.com <x-msg://59/eschwerin@obblaw.com>
P Consider the environment before printing this email.

WE’VE MOVED: PLEASE NOTE OUR NEW ADDRESS ABOVE

METADATA:

THREAD:

INDEX: Adhhnvc2s1BvaKNySlS/vpoMYtNiqw==

EMAIL DETAILS