EMAIL DETAILS

1. Leave health insurance in place obviously until Kathleen has had a chance to hire someone to do it for her. Just deduct her share of payment owed for the month of April from next alimony check if that's works for her.
2. Everything regarding debts will be taken care of in accordance with the MSA. Kathleen can do what she wants with the money I am gifting her outside of the MSA.
3. Rebekah continues to almost maliciously it seems suggest that I owe a debt to the Buhles. This is patently false. Any money then Buhles gave Kathleen we paid a gift tax on. If they receive a gift from me on behalf of Kathleen I assume they will comply with the IRS standards also.
4. The notion the R is giving me advice about the nature of the press and tabloids is truly astounding. I don't know what fantasy world she lives in, but her failure to recognize that she alone cost her client millions of dollars filing that motion and her failure to advise her client that it's in her own interest to help stop the bleeding is stupidity at best and malpractice at worst. I can't believe she phas the nerve to charge Kathleen anything to tell you the truth. Kathleen should go with D'Amato's advice and sue her for malpractice. Somehow Rebekah seems to have convinced Kath that the whole thing was our fault for not Requesting it be sealed.


Sent from my iPhone

> On Apr 6, 2017, at 4:31 PM, Eric Schwerin <eschwerin@rosemontseneca.com> wrote:
>
> Sorry for all the replies to this. Just got updated info.
>
> Re: the life insurance, he can’t collaterally assign it to Kathleen/an individual. Setting up an ILET would be time consuming, cumbersome and cost money. Since that isn’t required by the agreement I requested something from John Hancock saying that as of X date Kathleen is the sole beneficiary and Hunter can get that each year as required. Also, the agreement says she is irrevocably the beneficiary so that should cover that concern.
>
> While we are on insurance, Kathleen’s health insurance is paid through April 30th so I defer to Hunter but it makes sense to just remove her from the policy effective on that date. Then she would need to get health insurance effective May 1.
>
>
> Eric D. Schwerin
> Rosemont Seneca Advisors, LLC
> 2900 K Street, NW
> Suite 507
> Washington, DC 20007
> (202) 333-1880
> eschwerin@rosemontseneca.com
> P Consider the environment before printing this email.
>
> WE’VE MOVED: PLEASE NOTE OUR NEW ADDRESS ABOVE
>
>> On Apr 6, 2017, at 2:21 PM, SMancinelli <SMancinelli@ainbanklaw.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hunter and Eric-
>>
>> See below.
>>
>> Eric, I am cc’ing you here so that you can help with the logistics of the transfers, etc.
>>
>> Be in touch with responses to these when you can.
>>
>> Sarah
>>
>> From: Rebekah J.H. Sullivan [mailto:RSullivan@ksfmlaw.com]
>> Sent: Thursday, April 06, 2017 1:41 PM
>> To: SMancinelli
>> Subject: RE: Biden
>>
>> Sarah,
>>
>> We maintain that it is better for the privacy of both parties that no statements be released, and we ask that the MSA be modified to reflect that no statements will be released. Please understand that anything issued only gives the press something new to report on. If Hunter insists on releasing statements, we propose the following as his:
>>
>> This has been a very difficult two years for my family, particularly with the death of my brother and the conclusion of my marriage to Kathleen. We are fortunate to have three amazing daughters together. We have resolved our differences and entered into a settlement. We ask that everyone respect our privacy and the privacy of our children.
>>
>> There are several other matters related to moving forward that I want to raise with you:
>>
>> -I assume you will bring a Joint Waiver of Appeal, signed by Hunter, to the uncontested divorce hearing. Please let us know whether Hunter will be attending, and whether you have a signed Joint Waiver of Appeal.
>>
>> -Would you give me an update on the transfer of funds from Hunter’s IRA? We would like to get this accomplished before the hearing if possible
>>
>> -Would you also provide proof that Kathleen is the sole irrevocable beneficiary of Hunter’s $3,000,000 life insurance policy? Again, we would like this before the hearing.
>>
>> -Please ask Hunter to remove Kathleen’s name from any credit cards that he is able to. Relatedly, please have him move the debt from the American Express card as soon as possible so Kathleen can use that card
>>
>> -Does Hunter have any objection to Kathleen reaching out to Joan about transferring bills to her name?
>>
>> Thank you,
>>
>> Rebekah J.H. Sullivan
>> Kuder, Smollar, Friedman & Mihalik, PC
>> 1350 Connecticut Ave. NW
>> Suite 600
>> Washington, DC 20036
>>
>> www.KSFMLAW.com
>> Tel: 202/331-7522
>> Fax: 202/331-0388
>>
>>
>> <image001.png>
>> ******NOTICE*********
>> This e-mail message is confidential, intended only for the named recipient(s)
>> above and may contain information that is privileged, attorney work product
>> or exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you have received this
>> message in error, or are not the named recipient(s), please immediately notify
>> the sender at (202) 331-7522 and delete this e-mail message from your computer.
>> Thank You.
>>
>>
>>
>> From: SMancinelli [mailto:SMancinelli@ainbanklaw.com]
>> Sent: Wednesday, April 05, 2017 11:42 AM
>> To: Rebekah J.H. Sullivan
>> Subject: Biden
>>
>> Hi Rebekah-
>>
>> Attached is Hunter’s press statement. Its identical to the one that Meg prepared at mediation except that we changed “breakdown” to “conclusion”. Please confirm the attached is agreeable to Kathleen.
>>
>> Given the Court’s refusal to seal the file and the fact that TMZ has already run a story about the Judge’s Order from yesterday, our thought is that the parties should release these statements soon. Either before or in conjunction with the hearing next Friday.
>>
>> We welcome Kathleen’s input.
>>
>> Thank you-
>> Sarah
>>
>> Sarah E. Mancinelli, Esq.
>> Ain & Bank, P.C.
>> 1900 M. Street, NW, Suite 600
>> Washington, D.C. 20036-3565
>> (202) 530-3355 (direct dial)
>> (202) 530-4411 (fax)
>=2