EMAIL DETAILS

Colleagues -

I hope this note finds you well. I'm writing to call your attention to an issue that is a top priority for this Administration, and is moving quickly: the upcoming privatization of the Internet Domain Name System.

As many of your know, for 18 years, the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers - or ICANN - has managed the Domain Name System (DNS) with great success and with little oversight by the Commerce Department. Under this "multistakeholder approach," Internet stakeholders have driven DNS standards and policies, and the Internet has flourished worldwide.

However, in recent years, Russia, China, and other nations that censor content and limit free expression have voiced support for putting the United Nations in charge. Shifting control to the UN - or any intergovernmental body - would leave the Internet vulnerable to geopolitical disputes and endless bureaucratic delays. It would also chill innovation while making it harder for exporters to reach their customers and do business online - so it's not just bad policy, it is bad for business.

In order to protect the stability and security of the DNS and maintain the openness of the Internet, in 2014, the Obama Administration tasked stakeholders with creating a plan to transition DOC's stewardship role. That transition is set to begin on October 1. However, you may have seen in the recent press that Sen. Ted Cruz is leading an effort to derail the privatization of the DNS, claiming that this transition will have the exact effect it is intended to prevent.

I wanted to ensure that you are aware of this important issue. Politifact has rated Sen. Cruz's claims as false<http://www.politifact.com/texas/statements/2016/sep/14/ted-cruz/ted-cruz-incorrect-about-obama-giving-control-inte/>, and preventing this transition will put the freedom of the internet - and your ability to do business online - at considerable risk.

I've included a recent op-ed from Sec. Pritzker below, and would be happy to answer any questions you have.

Best,
Shannon

Shannon E. Roche
Director, Office of Business Liaison
U.S. Department of Commerce
SRoche@doc.gov<mailto:SRoche@doc.gov>
Direct: 202-482-5272
Mobile: 202-215-3119


From: Goldberg, Marni (Federal)
Sent: Wednesday, September 14, 2016 3:17 PM
To: Roche, Shannon (Federal)
Subject: ICYMI: THE HILL: ICANN transition protects Internet freedom

THE HILL
ICANN transition protects Internet freedom
By Penny Pritzker
September 14, 2016
http://thehill.com/blogs/congress-blog/technology/295736-icann-transition-makes-us-stronger-not-weaker

From strengthening cybersecurity, to promoting the free flow of information worldwide, to expanding broadband access, the Obama Administration has consistently championed policies to ensure the Internet remains the greatest platform for free expression, innovation, and economic opportunity ever known. Yet just as the United States, our allies, and global Internet freedom advocates prepare to enact a long-term framework to protect the web from government intrusion, some in Congress are threatening to derail this effort.

Their claim that President Obama "is giving away the Internet," is a patently false and misleading distortion.

The United States was a critical contributor to the Internet's development, but no single country, company, or organization owns it. While some of the first connections were established by U.S. government and military-backed research, the system was designed to be inherently open. Today, the Internet remains a decentralized network of connections owned, operated, and maintained by countless businesses worldwide, transcending all borders and uniting all people.

The erroneous claim that President Obama is "giving away the Internet" refers to a process our government started nearly 20 years ago to privatize management of the Domain Name System, or DNS. The DNS technical functions serve as a global address book of the Internet. Using domains like .com and .org, the DNS enables users to visit websites with memorable names instead of obscure numeric addresses. Without it, visiting a website like whitehouse.gov would require we type complex streams of numbers into our browsers.

During the 1990s, the U.S. government recognized the Internet's incredible potential and determined that the private sector - not governments - was more suited to manage the technical evolution of the DNS. And so, the White House tasked the Commerce Department, through the National Telecommunications and Information Administration (NTIA), with carrying out a plan to privatize the DNS.

NTIA partnered with the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers - or ICANN - to ensure the DNS would be managed by Internet stakeholders representing private industry, civil society, academia, and the greater online community.

Under this "multistakeholder approach," Internet stakeholders have driven DNS standards and policies, and the Internet has flourished worldwide. In today's digital economy, consumers and businesses rely on a myriad of online products, applications, services, and content for a wide range of daily activities. Two decades ago, just one percent of the world was online. Today, 45 percent - over three billion people - are online. Another two billion will connect by 2020.

Throughout this phenomenal growth, our government's stewardship role with respect to the DNS has remained largely clerical and symbolic. Yet the relationship has become a powerful symbol for authoritarian governments seeking more control over the Internet.

In recent years, Russia, China, and other nations that censor content and limit free expression have voiced support for putting the United Nations in charge, arguing that if the U.S. is so involved, every government should be involved.

We must not let that happen. Shifting control to the UN - or any intergovernmental body - would leave the Internet vulnerable to geopolitical disputes and endless bureaucratic delays. It would also chill innovation and impede the Internet's expansion to billions of people worldwide.

In 2014, the Obama Administration put Russia and China's march toward government micromanagement of the web on hold by announcing we would finally complete the privatization of the DNS promised in 1998. We tasked stakeholders with creating a plan to transition our stewardship role, strengthen multistakeholder governance, protect the stability and security of the DNS, and maintain the openness of the Internet.

We now have such a proposal - one supported by major Internet freedom advocates like the Center for Technology and Democracy and Human Rights Watch, technology industry groups like the Internet Association, and business organizations like the U.S. Chamber of Commerce.

They all support this transition because it ensures the Internet remains accountable to the people, businesses, and organizations that use it, run it, and depend on it worldwide. Through ICANN's Governmental Advisory Committee, government will be a voice at the table - but not the only voice. And certainly not a controlling voice.

The U.S. government has no statutory authority over ICANN. With the transition set to begin on Oct. 1, any effort by Congress to derail the privatization of the DNS would embolden those who seek greater government control.

Internet freedom is an economic and foreign policy priority for the United States. We envision a world where everyone has access to the Internet and the vast opportunities for communication, entrepreneurship, and empowerment it affords. The best way to ensure the continued expansion of a free, open, and truly global Internet is to entrust it not to governments but to the online community itself.

The deceptive claim that President Obama is "giving away the Internet" implies that this transition somehow weakens American power - when in truth, it makes us stronger.


Sean Gogolin
Press Assistant
Office of Public Affairs
Department of Commerce
(202) 230-4641