EMAIL DETAILS
SUBJECT:
Re: Clinton Foundation
PRI: NORMAL
FROM:
E
eschwerin@rosemontseneca.com
DATE:
2016-08-24 22:57:38
MSG_ID:
<6008180512215197964@unknownmsgid>
RECIPIENTS:
TO:
S
Alexander S. Mackler
<smacklera@gmail.com>
CC:
H
Hunter Biden
<hbiden@rosemontseneca.com>
CONTENT:
TEXT: YES |
HTML: YES
PROCESSED
The reporting on this was actually pretty shoddy it makes me sympathetic to them. Eric D. Schwerin eschwerin@rosemontseneca.com Sent from my iPhone On Aug 24, 2016, at 6:53 PM, Alexander S. Mackler <smacklera@gmail.com> wrote: Very true but also very difficult argument to make to general public. And they've been seedy for so long they lose benefit of doubt... On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 3:55 PM, Eric Schwerin <eschwerin@rosemontseneca.com > wrote: > First Read: “The latest controversy over the Clinton Foundation — the > allegation that special access was given to Foundation donors when Hillary > Clinton was secretary of state — follows a familiar pattern: The entire > arrangement appears sloppy, careless, and seedy… But there’s another > familiar pattern to the discussion, especially regarding the AP report > showing that Foundation donors met with Clinton when she was secretary of > state: This kind of behavior is standard operating procedure for any > politician. If you’re a sitting congressman, senator, or governor — raise > your hand if you’ve never granted meetings with big donors (either ones > you’ve known before or after the donation). This is a practice that happens > ALL of the time in American politics. And as a result, none of it is > illegal or demands a special prosecutor. So two things can true at the same > time: One, what the Clintons are doing can be sloppy, careless and seedy. > And two, they’re not the only ones doing it.” > > > “Of course, the ‘they’re-not-the-only-ones-doing-it’ reasoning isn’t > always sufficient in a political campaign, especially one for the highest > office in the land. The Clinton Foundation was always going to be a target > in this campaign. And if you’re scratching your head as to why the Clintons > didn’t have a better plan for dealing with it — like having well-devised > exit strategy months ago — remember that the decisions are usually coming > from the principals rather than the political advisers.” > > > > > > > Eric D. Schwerin > Rosemont Seneca Advisors, LLC > 1010 Wisconsin Ave., NW > Suite 705 > Washington, DC 20007 > (202) 333-1880 > eschwerin@rosemontseneca.com > *P* *Consider the environment before printing this email.* > > -- Alexander Snyder Mackler (302) 598-867
METADATA:
THREAD:
INDEX:
AdhhnyDxTx1W+A2uT6KSZQabrp/Gbw==
REFERENCES:
REPLY_TO:
<CAPudD-bzLdTdm0npPwXpOY3ez64g85+1hB=9WAJeE1N353KYeg@mail.gmail.com>
REFS:
<F0392E7E-A226-4DEA-A20F-6256DA1EB133@rosemontseneca.com>
<CAPudD-bzLdTdm0npPwXpOY3ez64g85+1hB=9WAJeE1N353KYeg@mail.gmail.com>