EMAIL DETAILS
SUBJECT:
Friday, October 7, 2016
PRI: NORMAL
FROM:
T
thegab@usglc.org
DATE:
2016-10-07 17:31:39
MSG_ID:
<26e77765d3ed466ba4a4e880d793c4bc@usglc.org>
RECIPIENTS:
TO:
H
Hunter Biden
<hbiden@rosemontseneca.com>
CONTENT:
TEXT: YES |
HTML: YES
PROCESSED
The Weekly GAB Friday, October 7, 2016 U.S. Global Leadership Coalition | www.usglc.org http://action.usglc.org/site/R?i=mR3GCf80X_KoP7xoAdngLQ Campaign 2016 THE WASHINGTON POST A President Trump Could End the Era of American Global Leadership | http://action.usglc.org/site/R?i=05tnLcSD6XXFW8ZQArw9Jg The Editorial Board The election of Trump would likely bring about the end of the era of American global leadership that began in 1945. The U.S. alliances built after World War II, which have been the foundation of that strength, would be disregarded. A new, cynical, self-interested America would emerge, ready to use walls, boycotts, assassination and torture to achieve its aims, and to partner with like-minded regimes such as Russia. For those who believe in traditional American liberal values, the world would become a much colder - and more dangerous - place. BUSINESS WIRE Trump, Clinton Release Statements About Hunger and Poverty in Advance of Oct. 9 Debate http://action.usglc.org/site/R?i=iZwARLpeyQzg3KDW7lXeFg Trump notes that hunger and poverty around the world are a threat to international peace and stability. But he proposes to cut international development and humanitarian programs, calling vital programs such as maternal and child health "bloated and unaccountable." Clinton's statement also discusses her work to raise the productivity of struggling farmers in poor countries and says she will fight to eradicate hunger worldwide. THE DELAWARE NEWS JOURNAL The World is Pulling for Clinton http://action.usglc.org/site/R?i=x40CyFjiYQ1oNKl1ycmdnQ Josef Joffe is editor of Die Zeit in Hamburg and fellow of the Hoover Institution at Stanford University, where he teaches U.S. foreign policy. First, whatever Trump spouts about has-been America, the United States remains the one and only global power - No. 1 in terms of economic, military and cultural clout. What it does, and what it doesn't do, affects the entire world. Postwar America designed and defended the world's liberal order - free trade, open societies and such. It held the line against the Soviets and their sundry allies from the Middle to Asia. The European democracies profited handsomely from the toils of the United States, the world's custodian. Now, the United States leads the battle against the Islamists, the spearhead of religious totalitarianism. How would an inward-bound America sustain an open-ended defense? THE HILL Trump's 'Snapchat' Foreign Policy Sucker Punches US Interests http://action.usglc.org/site/R?i=KjJmeHxsb-c3DtaD32hPoA Mark P. Lagon is Centennial Fellow in the Walsh School of Foreign Service at Georgetown University, and was U.S. Ambassador-At-Large to Combat Trafficking in Persons from 2001 to 2009. There are three kinds of foreign policy presidents. The best understands that U.S. interests and values go hand in hand. Doing something morally right - like humanitarian relief, helping dissidents, or spending to fight global AIDS - isn't pure altruism. He or she understands a freer and more prosperous world make for a strong America, and vice versa. [Donald Trump] admires strongmen, like Vladimir Putin, despite their brutality and mendacity. He invokes "making America great again" and "winning" while not recognizing interests even in a short-term sense. Scuttling NATO or profiling all Muslims and refugees as threats violate both our values and even a narrow view of our interests. But Clinton clearly has the potential to be to be in the stronger class of foreign policy presidents - because true leadership combines our interests and values. Development & Diplomacy USGLC BLOG A Hemisphere Without War? | http://action.usglc.org/site/R?i=56LGO556F1gfqAeGLF-Edw Sean Hansen The Western Hemisphere has seen a dramatic transformation from the civil wars, insurgencies, and conflicts that raged throughout the region decades ago. Latin America has seen vast improvements in economic growth, democratization, and global health. Poverty has declined sharply in the past 20 years from 49 to 31 percent, and infant mortality is down 70 percent since the 1960s. By investing in development, good governance, and peace in Latin America, the U.S. is helping to build resilience and promote stability in our own backyard. THE NEW YORK REVIEW OF BOOKS The Best Ways to Deal with the Refugee Crisis http://action.usglc.org/site/R?i=dgsE80Ga41kIegG37JedSg David Miliband is President and CEO of the International Rescue Committee. He served as Foreign Secretary of the UK from 2007 to 2010.? First, donors need to accept the idea that the best approach to helping refugees is often not to deliver tents or food but instead to give them money. A study in 2015 by the Overseas Development Institute summarized well the case for greater use of cash assistance. Second, refugees need to be given the chance to earn a legitimate living. Third, there needs to be a concerted drive to determine what types of aid programs deliver maximum value for money. Fourth, those working in countries facing humanitarian crises need to channel their efforts toward achieving a limited number of specific, clear, measurable outcomes. THE WASHINGTON POST The United States Must Help Pull Yemen Back From Total Collapse http://action.usglc.org/site/R?i=em_K_apPx-cnDG6FrKtTCg Jean-Marie Guéhenno is president and chief executive of the International Crisis Group, an independent organization that works to prevent and resolve deadly conflict. The war in Yemen has created one of the worst humanitarian emergencies in the Middle East, and that is saying a lot. More than 21 million people are in need of humanitarian assistance - around 80 percent of the country's population. Fourteen million people are food insecure. As President Obama enters the twilight of his term and looks back at a Middle East on fire, Yemen, the forgotten war, offers the chance of a diplomatic success. After a year of military stalemate, both sides have agreed on a range of steps that could end the war. Closing a deal is far from guaranteed. But, if it is to happen at all, it requires immediate and consistent diplomatic follow-up and pressure on U.S. allies, something that has been sorely absent thus far. FOREIGN POLICY U.S. Scrambles to Support Santos After Shock Defeat of Peace Deal | http://action.usglc.org/site/R?i=SYGNwx81RehNtgKrtgDysw John Hudson The surprise vote marked a staggering setback for Santos, who gambled his political career on winning the referendum and ending the half-century war with the leftist separatists. But the decision also dealt a blow to the United States, which spent years aiding a military offensive against the FARC rebels and then backed painstaking talks that led to the historic agreement. Privately, U.S. diplomats blamed Santos's failed messaging campaign and overconfidence for the massive setback. Publicly, the State Department sought to maintain hope for Santos as he tries to salvage the elusive peace agreement. Politics & Foreign Policy THE PITTSBURGH POST-GAZETTE The U.S. is Riding Europe's Superpower Coattail http://action.usglc.org/site/R?i=bRHzs1Cn0PIoi7O0Bi7_mQ Andrew Moravcsik is a professor of politics at Princeton University and a senior fellow at the Transatlantic Academy. President Barack Obama and Donald Trump rarely agree on foreign policy. Yet they share one core belief: Our closest allies in Europe are exploiting U.S. military might. But Mr. Trump and Mr. Obama are both wrong. Yes, the United States pays a disproportionate share of direct military costs, but Europe already assumes more than its fair share of the regional security burden. It invests not only in its military but also in crucial geo-economic and institutional instruments that the United States needs yet does not possess. In this respect, the United States free rides on European power. When Americans think about global influence, they tend to calculate only military power when nonmilitary instruments are often more effective. REUTERS Putin Suspends Nuclear Pact, Raising Stakes in Row with Washington | http://action.usglc.org/site/R?i=K2CrQHXqnK8RgHVWvmZwlg Dmitry Solovyov and Christian Lowe Russian President Vladimir Putin on Monday suspended a treaty with Washington on cleaning up weapons-grade plutonium, signaling he is willing to use nuclear disarmament as a new bargaining chip in disputes with the United States over Ukraine and Syria. Starting in the last years of the Cold War, Russia and the United States signed a series of accords to reduce the size of their nuclear arsenals, agreements that have so far survived intact despite a souring of U.S.-Russian relations under Putin. But on Monday, Putin issued a decree suspending an agreement, concluded in 2000, which bound the two sides to dispose of surplus plutonium originally intended for use in nuclear weapons. THE NEW YORK TIMES Half of Chinese Favorable Toward U.S., but Many See a Threat, Survey Finds | http://action.usglc.org/site/R?i=bRob972aS_7oKZrErhTQSA Edward Wong With tensions between the United States and China on the rise over issues such as the South China Sea and cyberespionage, one might think the citizens of the two nations have an increasingly hostile view of the other. Yet, Chinese have a more favorable view of the United States than they did a year ago, according to the results of a global survey released by the Pew Research Center on Wednesday. They hold that perspective even as many cite the United States as a major threat to China, Pew said. THE WALL STREET JOURNAL Stop Assad Now-Or Expect Years of War http://action.usglc.org/site/R?i=wsPcctsuIbG_quKZx2u8mw John McCain, a Republican from Arizona, is chairman of the Senate Armed Services Committee. While the U.S.-led coalition is making progress in the fight against Islamic State, we cannot forget this terrorist organization is a symptom of the Syrian civil war. The future of that conflict will have significant strategic impact on U.S. national security. Any alternative approach must begin with grounding Mr. Assad's air power. At the same time, we must provide more robust military assistance to the vetted Syrian opposition groups that are fighting the regime. The Obama administration's approach to Syria has failed miserably. Now is the time for a new strategy-including the necessary military component-that can achieve this more realistic objective. ASSOCIATED PRESS Once Lauded as a Peacemaker, Obama's Tenure Fraught with War | http://action.usglc.org/site/R?i=rjQ0nGGuws2cfpEkrJWWkA Kathleen Hennessey On matters of war and peace, Obama has proven to be a confounding and contradictory figure, one who stands to leave behind both devastating and pressing failures, as well as a set of fresh accomplishments whose impact could resonate for decades. He is the erstwhile anti-war candidate, now engaged in more theaters of war than his predecessor. He has championed diplomacy on climate change, nuclear proliferation and has torn down walls to Cuba and Myanmar, but failed repeatedly to broker a lasting pause to more than six years of slaughter in Syria. The U.S. Global Leadership Coalition 1129 20th Street NW, Suite 600, Washington, DC 20036 Manage Subscriptions | Unsubscribe | USGLC.org http://action.usglc.org/site/R?i=Jt6PPvqw76eznB0V6ziuyQ http://action.usglc.org/site/CO?i=4Rp3nzsqHS6hpS37PQfqtaB8lOcy2iRc&cid=1181 http://action.usglc.org/site/R?i=tKhfl-XZSDFU7lKAE8vmDA http://action.usglc.org/site/R?i=tNOjvwJqJ-21m2FkzVaBzA
METADATA:
THREAD:
INDEX:
AdhhnyneO0ZmkDjZQQqD+oMMdHj22Q==