EMAIL DETAILS

Perfect. Let me know place and time. We can do it in my office if you
want.

On Sep 21, 2010, at 11:37 AM, Hilary Rosen <HRosen@skdknick.com> wrote:

> We need a meeting. And we need to include Hunter and Eric. I could
> meet tomorrow morning.
>
>
>
> Hilary Rosen | SKDKnickerbocker
>
> 202.464.6900 (O) | 202.320.2711 (C) | HRosen@SKDKnick.com
>
> 1818 N Street NW, Suite 450, Washington DC 20036
>
>
>
> From: Singham, Shanker A. [mailto:SSingham@ssd.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 21, 2010 11:15 AM
> To: Nell McGarity
> Cc: Virginia.Verdeja@cafusa.com; tomar@cafusa.com; Hilary Rosen;
> Alex Slater
> Subject: RE: Follow-up on FTA
>
>
>
> Nell: FTA did not call. I spoke to Jayme on another matter, and he
> responded with an e-mail noting that on this matter they were
> drafting their response to both the Request and the further letter
> we sent them on Monday. I am continuing to try to get a sense of
> their timing now, but I suspect that they won't want to give that
> away any more than they have. Jayme has probably already gone too
> far (from FTA's perspective) in letting me know that they are
> drafting their response. That could mean a lot of different things.
> It could be denial, or it could be something else. It's a regulatory
> process. If it is a denial, we don't have a regulatory avenue after
> that, other than full judicial review.
>
>
>
> The most important thing right now is to do what we can to slow them
> down. I understand that there are a lot of political tracks moving
> to achieve this goal so that is good. I would suggest from our
> perspective that any Congressional letters/statements or other
> political support should ensure that FTA takes due time to
> understand CAF USA's response to their Report, and does what they
> pointedly did not do in the investigation which is to fully and
> properly "get our perspective". At some point before the final
> decision on reconsideration, we ought to be given the opportunity to
> respond to any reactions they have to our factual and legal
> statements.
>
>
>
> FYI -- Dorval misstepped in our meeting when he said that he
> admitted that FTA did not reach out to us because they felt that
> they did not need our perspective in the Investigation. Ultimately
> that could be costly and would be exhibit A in any kind of judicial
> review. Shanker.
>
> From: Nell McGarity [mailto:NMcgarity@skdknick.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 21, 2010 10:47 AM
> To: Singham, Shanker A.
> Cc: Virginia Verdeja (Virginia.Verdeja@cafusa.com); Jitendra Tomar (tomar@cafusa.com
> ); Hilary Rosen; Alex Slater
> Subject: Follow-up on FTA
>
> Hi Shanker,
>
>
>
> Tomar told me that the FTA called you and that they are preparing
> their response. I wanted to follow-up with you to see if you got a
> sense of their timing or the outcome so that we can begin to put
> together our response.
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Nell
>