EMAIL DETAILS
SUBJECT:
Becker Burke follow up
PRI: NORMAL
FROM:
N
ncallahan@rosemontseneca.com
DATE:
2010-10-01 20:31:31
MSG_ID:
<00ea01cb61a7$a2d8a1d0$e889e570$@com>
RECIPIENTS:
TO:
A
'Arlene Busch'
<abusch@rosemontseneca.com>
A
'Alexandra Stanton'
<acstanton@yahoo.com>
A
'Alex Stanton'
<astanton@rosemontseneca.com>
D
'Devon Archer'
<darcher@rosemontseneca.com>
E
'Eric Schwerin'
<eschwerin@rosemontseneca.com>
H
'Hunter Biden'
<hbiden@rosemontseneca.com>
J
'Joan Peugh'
<jpeugh@rosemontseneca.com>
CONTENT:
TEXT: YES |
HTML: YES
PROCESSED
Hi guys, Here is a run down of the next steps with BB based on our call this morning. Please review and let me know your thoughts. My plan would be to head out there after at least 2 of the due diligence meetings are conducted. 1. 4 Due Diligence meetings a. They agreed to do due diligence meetings at all of clients b. BB will schedule them directly with our clients and get all the meeting completed this month c. BB will share their due diligence report with us so we can learn what they are looking for which will help us to hone our offerings 2. Collaborative Ideas with BB a. Thought Leadership / Education i. We could be very helpful in education the Public and Union plan boards on the Alternative Investments 1. Telling the Heinz story of their success in AI investing and giving examples of Public and Union funds that have been successful in the space would be very helpful to the boards, BB and us 2. Essentially many of the Public and Union boards in the sub $1B space are not sophisticated and look at Wall Street and Hedge Fund through the lenses of the newspapers and dont spend the time to become educated on the market 3. And with Public funds adjusting their models (i.e., the NYS projected annual rate of return in being lowered from 8.5%) they will be force to seek higher returns in the AI space, or they will have to raise tax and/or reduce retiree benefits both of which will hurt the politicians, so seeking AI will likely win out 4. How it could work: a. We develop some educational material and have calls/meetings with BB clients and prospects and other. b. We charge a seminar fee / training fee or BB hire us as a research company, etc. b. Private Deal Flow i. BB was very interesting in hearing about the Private Deal (i.e, Matador, IB Solar, others) 1. They mentioned they fill those deals 100% if we had them 2. Their Public, Corp and Union clients loves those types of deals basically principle is risk fee and the IRRs of 11-12% are just fine with them 3. So we could find deals and have BB and other consultants fill them with their clients something we have talked about, but this gives us a vehicle to try and do it without any incremental cost of overhead c. Public Plans i. BB opened my eyes to the Public Plans there are more of them and they have less stringent governance regulations than the Unions ii. The sub $1B space could be very attractive to introduce our clients to (i.e., City of Syracuse plan, etc.) iii. Is there a reason for us to stay away from the Public plans directly or indirectly? d. Introductions i. We could help BB meet Public and Union plans in the sub $1B space (i.e., City of Ann Arbor, Rhode Island Firefights, etc.) ii. We could be paid a research fee or retainer, etc. 3. Next steps are to follow up and make sure the due diligence meetings happen and to meet up in Chicago to brainstorm on the ¾ ideas listed above. Best, Neil ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------- Neil Callahan Rosemont Seneca 401 Greenwich Street, Suite 400 | New York NY 10013 | 212-933-9965 | 212-796-4037 1010 Wisconsin Avenue, Suite 705 | Washington DC 20007 | 202-333-1880 917-945-9516 (mobile) 866-749-8879 (fax)
METADATA:
THREAD:
INDEX:
Acthp6IQKatS4bh3Tfe5/nWdAWi7eA==