EMAIL DETAILS
SUBJECT:
Japan, Libya, and Why Leaders Should be Paranoid - Bloomberg
PRI: NORMAL
FROM:
M
mandrews@ips.edu
DATE:
2011-03-29 14:54:51
MSG_ID:
<8AC253F9-E90A-4889-A689-61F543E4C922@ips.edu>
RECIPIENTS:
TO:
C
Chris Heinz
<cheinz@rosemontcapital.com>
D
Devon Archer
<darcher@rosemontseneca.com>
E
Eric Schwerin
<eschwerin@rosemontseneca.com>
H
Hunter Biden
<hbiden@rosemontseneca.com>
CONTENT:
TEXT: YES |
HTML: YES
PROCESSED
> > Japan, Libya, and Why Leaders Should be Paranoid > 2011-03-21T13:46:06Z > > By Rosabeth Moss Kanter > > There is no silver lining in the gray cloud surrounding the Japanese > nuclear plant, or, for that matter, in the bomb trails above Libya. > If you're in Northern California, reports of elevated radiation > levels in Sacramento is unsettling, to say the least, especially if > you're part of the Silicon Valley entrepreneurial revival and just > want to move ahead with your social network business. > > It's hard enough to get good ideas off the ground without having to > worry about the sky. Last year's spring surprise was volcanic ash > hovering over Europe. This year brings disruptions from earthquakes > in Japan and rebellions in the Middle East. > > Do you think the world is out to get you? Go ahead, be a little > paranoid. That's my management tip for today. > > Andy Grove, Intel's legendary former CEO, famously touted the > virtues of paranoia as a leadership asset — running scared about > imagined enemies or competitors. He didn't mean the kind of paranoia > that provokes a dictator like Libya's Gaddafi into censoring > communications, suppressing dissent, and killing protestors. He > meant the kind of concern about threats that propels a search for > excellence — how to keep getting better and better so that > competitors can't touch you. > > A few Middle Eastern rulers are trying this tack, changing ministers > and investing in things that people want before internal dissent > gets out of hand — in essence, upgrading their product before losing > market position. It can be productive to think that "they" are out > to get you, and there are enemies (or competitors) lurking in every > corner, if it motivates higher performance — excellence so strong > that it compels loyalty and commitment and reduces complaints. That > has been Singapore's secret of success. Feeling vulnerable as a > small city-state, Singapore's leaders set high standards, benchmark > against the best in the world, seek innovation, and invest in ideas > of the future > > Positive paranoia is also the secret of some great Japanese > companies. Komatsu, a globally prominent construction equipment > manufacturer, drove excellence by fearing Caterpillar, the U.S. > giant. Beating Caterpillar was the goal and "encircle Cat" the > theme. A Komatsu executive with whom I had dinner in Tokyo recently > said that both companies improved because of the rivalry, with each > looking over its shoulder at the other to ensure being ahead with > the highest standards. > > Unfortunately for the Japanese people, and potentially the Pacific > Rim, Tokyo Electric Power failed the paranoia test, showing far too > little paranoia about nuclear accident risks in an earthquake-prone > country. The company failed to benchmark world excellence in its > nuclear plants, according to news reports, and invest in the best > measures. Officials chose lower-cost expedience over excellence. > > Why do too many so-called leaders think they can get by with > assuming the status quo and doing the minimum, rather than striving > for excellence even when they think they can get away without it? > Putting off actions until disaster strikes makes it too late. This > is how a losing streak begins in any system. A slow accretion of > neglected repairs, postponed upgrades, or reductions in training and > education weaken the organization, or nation until decline becomes > inevitable. The opposite is also true. A gradual accumulation of > innovations, however small, prepares any system to respond rapidly > to crises or demands for change. Indeed, fearing that "they're out > to shut us down" and taking actions to prevent that is the best > guarantee of continuing to flourish. Winning streaks are > characterized by confidence but also by running scared that great > performance cannot be repeated unless there is redoubled effort. > > More paranoia and less complacency could be useful in any sector. In > health care, for example, the thought that "they're out to sue us" > compels physicians to practice defensive medicine, ordering > sometimes unnecessary tests — but not unnecessary if the tests > detect problems. Perhaps that paranoid thought with a performance- > enhancement twist could compel more hospital leaders to insist on > checklists for surgery and other processes, to avoid preventable > harm and operate with excellence. > > The positive paranoia mantra: Imagine the worst, and create the > best. That's a good lesson for leaders under any circumstances. > > > Copyright © 2010 Harvard Business School Publishing. All rights > reserved. Harvard Business Publishing is an affiliate of Harvard > Business School. >
METADATA:
THREAD:
INDEX:
Adhhnzvl93yZ2aMEQNyP0dbvFsQMBg==
REFERENCES:
REFS:
<3CFF0497-699F-402E-8AF2-41CB61CDCC00@ips.edu>