EMAIL DETAILS

Hunter --

This weekend, The New York Times Magazine ran a long analysis of the
2012 election headlined, "Is Obama toast?"

It uses a mathematical formula to conclude who will win this race.

In other words, it says neither you nor Barack Obama has a role to play in
this election, because the outcome is essentially predetermined.

We disagree.

The outcome will depend on what we do every single day between now
and November 6th, 2012. And I want to give you an idea of how we know
that.

Our Republican opponents, from Mitt Romney and Herman Cain to Rick
Perry and Michele Bachmann, have endorsed the same set of Tea Party
policies that drive the Republicans in Washington: letting Wall Street write
its own rules again and giving special treatment to millionaires and billionaires
while asking seniors and middle-class families to pay for it.

All of them would return to the failed economic policies that led us into
recession.

Yet the Times piece assigns each of them a score on an ideological scale,
ignoring the obvious reality that there has been virtually no difference among
the GOP candidates -- or between them and the Republican congressional
leaders who refuse to do anything to restore economic security for the middle
class.

Whoever wins the nomination will no doubt try to appear more "moderate" as
they compete for undecided voters in the general election. But they have all
made their positions clear. And we will hold them accountable for that.

The only true difference in this race is between their agenda and President
Obama's. Facing historic challenges when he came into office, he has fought
every day for a fairer economy where everybody who does their fair share gets
a fair shake.

He's stood up to credit card companies to ensure they can't target consumers with
hidden fees. He's stood up to insurance companies, who can no longer deny health
care coverage on the basis of a pre-existing condition. He's stood up to Wall Street
to end taxpayer bailouts and rein in the kind of risky financial behavior that nearly
toppled our economy.

These dramatic differences between the Republican nominee and President Obama
will be crystal clear to Americans as the 2012 election approaches, because our grassroots
organization in all 50 states will be having conversations every single day with
their friends, families, co-workers, and neighbors.

That grassroots organizational advantage is a critical factor in this election that
the Times' "formula" doesn't consider at all.

More than 1 million people have already taken ownership of this campaign.
Millions more are organizing their communities on behalf of the President, online and
off. This weekend, we had our single biggest day of action of the campaign
-- more than 2,000 volunteer events took place across the country, and more
than 10,000 volunteers participated.

This work is already having an impact across the country.

We expanded the electoral map in the last election, fighting hard for -- and winning --
states like North Carolina, Colorado, and Virginia so that the entire election didn't
hinge on the results in a single state, as it had in 2000 and 2004.

We have no intention of returning to the old electoral map. And the organizing
you're doing means we won't have to. Today, we are showing signs of strength
in states we didn't win even in the watershed election of 2008 -- states like Georgia
and Arizona, where a recent poll had President Obama beating every potential
Republican nominee.

The map isn't as friendly to our opponents, who won't be able to compete in
traditionally Democratic states because their organization won't compare to ours.
Whether you measure donors giving or doors knocked, there's grassroots enthusiasm
for President Obama that the other side can't match -- but that the Times doesn't
consider relevant.

The truth is this isn't the first time you've been written out of the story by many in
Washington and the media -- and it's not the first time they've been completely
wrong about that.

In the 2007 and 2008 campaign, almost everyone in professional politics said it
wasn't Barack Obama's "turn" to be president. But millions of people like you took
responsibility for the campaign -- knocking on doors, making phone calls, and donating
whenever you could.

You proved everyone wrong -- not just about who was going to win the election, but
about the ability of everyday Americans to come together and change the course
of history.

The entire premise of the Times article is that you won't -- and can't -- do it in 2012.

The election is now less than one year away. No one thinks it will be easy. But there
can be no doubt its outcome depends on how hard you and I work over the next 364
days. Right now, we're opening field offices in key states, hiring organizers, recruiting
volunteers, registering voters, and getting ready for what's going to be one hell of a fight.

So, is Obama toast? It's up to you.

- Messina

Jim Messina
Campaign Manager
Obama for America

P.S. -- Want to show the cynics that this election is in your hands? Donate $165 or
more today:

https://donate.barackobama.com/Up-to-Us11

---------------------------------------------------------------------
Paid for by Obama for America

Contributions or gifts to Obama for America are not tax deductible.

This email was sent to: hbiden@senecaga.com
To update your address, go to: http://www.barackobama.com/change-address?email=hbiden@senecaga.com
To unsubscribe, go to: http://my.barackobama.com/unsubscription