EMAIL DETAILS
SUBJECT:
=?utf-8?Q?Re:_Samantha_Bee_to_Mitch_McConnell:_=E2=80=9CWhat_better_way_to?=
=?utf-8?Q?_honor_America=E2=80=99s_greatest_champion_of_original_intent_th?=
=?utf-8?Q?an_by_wiping_your_obstructionist_ass_on_the_very_document_he_hol?=
=?utf-8?Q?ds_so_dear=E2=80=9D_-_Salon.com?=
PRI: NORMAL
FROM:
S
smacklera@gmail.com
DATE:
2016-02-17 00:23:47
MSG_ID:
<CAPudD-ZSz=kNJDcZy7shqD5En=1xfwKJwUCPaGxgn-L6ZKPxXg@mail.gmail.com>
RECIPIENTS:
TO:
E
Eric Schwerin
<eschwerin@rosemontseneca.com>
CC:
H
Hunter Biden
<hbiden@rosemontseneca.com>
CONTENT:
TEXT: YES |
HTML: YES
PROCESSED
Jerk stole my idea, but he inserted Ted into it. So, points for creativity. Why Obama Should Nominate Barack Obama For The Supreme Court Vacancy The solution to this political problem is staring at him in the mirror. 02/16/2016 01:43 pm ET | *Updated* 3 hours ago - Ryan Grim <http://www.huffingtonpost.com/ryan-grim> Washington Bureau Chief, The Huffington Post Photo illustration by Kate Sheppard/Huffington Post, with images from AP Photo/Manuel Balce Ceneta President Barack Obama could just nominate himself to the Supreme Court vacancy left by the unexpected death of Justice Antonin Scalia. WASHINGTON -- Senate Republicans have insisted that no matter who President Barack Obama nominates for the Supreme Court, there will be no hearings, no votes, no nothing. But there may be one potential candidate that Republicans would have a hard time blocking: Obama could appoint <https://twitter.com/ZachWahls/status/698630545073430528> constitutional law professor Barack Obama. There's roughly a zero percent chance this'll happen, but here's why it makes sense: Appointing Obama would put the GOP in the position they've desperately wanted to be in since the man was inaugurated. They'd have the chance to vote him out of office. If he's truly as dangerous and illegitimate a president as Republicans say, then this is their opportunity to get him out of the White House by putting him on the court. The move would also give Kentucky Republican Mitch McConnell a chance to virtually guarantee that he remains Majority Leader Mitch McConnell. (McConnell would have to persuade his colleagues not to filibuster.) Some of the most vulnerable Republicans would have their 2016 chances boosted by voting to confirm Obama. Sens. Pat Toomey (Pa.), Rob Portman (Ohio), Kelly Ayotte (N.H.) and Ron Johnson (Wis.) would be assured re-election if they could peel off a small portion of Democratic voters grateful for the bipartisan move. With those four alone, Democrats would have 50 votes, a tie that could be broken by Vice President Joe Biden -- who would be all too pleased to cast the deciding vote to make himself president, even if he'd become one of the shortest-serving presidents in history. And Biden, of course, would then name his longtime ally and Senate successor Ted Kaufman as vice president. If Biden happened to meet the same sudden fate as Antonin Scalia did, Kaufman could quickly go about the business of breaking up the banks. <http://www.huffingtonpost.com/sen-ted-kaufman/obamas-big-bank-opportuni_b_3109801.html> White House aide Eric Schultz, asked if Obama had considered nominating Obama, noted that the president "has said he's not interested in being a Supreme Court justice," citing a New Yorker article <http://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2014/10/27/obama-brief> by Jeffrey Toobin and a recent interview on Ellen <http://www.mcall.com/entertainment/la-et-st-ellen-degeneres-president-obama-discussion-20160212-story.html>. Sure, Obama may have said that, but what if the president himself called on him to serve? Wouldn't that change his thinking? "The press corps is officially unhinged," Schultz suggested. *Sign up here to get an email* <https://actionnetwork.org/forms/sign-up-to-get-ryan-grims-bad-news-in-your-inbox>* when Ryan Grim writes a new story.* On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 11:49 AM, Eric Schwerin < eschwerin@rosemontseneca.com> wrote: > > > http://www.salon.com/2016/02/16/samantha_bee_to_mitch_mcconnell_what_better_way_to_honor_americas_greatest_champion_of_original_intent_than_by_wiping_your_obstructionist_ass_on_the_very_document_he_holds_so_dear/?source=newsletter > > Samantha Bee to Mitch McConnell: “What better way to honor America’s > greatest champion of original intent than by wiping your obstructionist ass > on the very document he holds so dear” > > Unsurprisingly, Samantha Bee is still killing the game after her sophomore > episode of “Full Frontal.” This week Bee tackled Scalia’s successor and the > GOP debate. > > On Mitch McConnell’s argument that President Obama, as a lame duck > president, should forego a Supreme Court nomination: “What better way to > honor America’s greatest champion of original intent than by wiping your > obstructionist ass on the very document he holds so dear.” > You Might Also Like > > “Let’s just have a Supreme Court vacancy for a year because some chinless > dildo wants a justice who’ll use his gavel to plug up your abortion hole,” > Bee added. “Filling Court vacancies is one of only three jobs a president > actually has: appointing justices, bombing the shit out of the Middle East, > and turkey pardoning. That’s it.” > > Despite his decidedly conservative stances, “we can still find some nice > things to say about him,” Bee said of Scalia. “If you like the freedom to > play violent video games, watch Internet porn, and grow weed in your house > without police using thermal imaging to bust you, you owe a debt to Antonin > Scalia.” > > “You also probably work on my staff,” Bee added. > > Watch Samantha Bee’s on-point analysis below: > > <http://www.salon.com/2016/02/16/samantha_bee_to_mitch_mcconnell_what_better_way_to_honor_americas_greatest_champion_of_original_intent_than_by_wiping_your_obstructionist_ass_on_the_very_document_he_holds_so_dear/> > > > Eric D. Schwerin > eschwerin@rosemontseneca.com > > Sent from my iPhone > -- Alexander Snyder Mackler (302) 598-867
METADATA:
THREAD:
INDEX:
Adhhn2KSrgbYFtcaRES11mY+B97qsg==
REFERENCES:
REPLY_TO:
<-8159424700306416046@unknownmsgid>
REFS:
<-8159424700306416046@unknownmsgid>