EMAIL DETAILS
SUBJECT:
Please review
PRI: NORMAL
FROM:
A
aperez@talgo-inc.com
DATE:
2010-05-25 05:07:13
MSG_ID:
<C820A911.12641%aperez@talgo-inc.com>
RECIPIENTS:
TO:
H
Hunter Biden
<hbiden@rosemontseneca.com>
CC:
E
Eric D. Schwerin
<eschwerin@rosemontseneca.com>
N
Nora Friend
<nfriend@talgo-inc.com>
CONTENT:
TEXT: YES |
HTML: YES
PROCESSED
Hunter, Can you please quickly review the e-mail below that I want to send Jennifer Esposito, Staff Director of Congressman Oberstar? >> Dear Jennifer, >> >> I left you a voice message last week. The purpose of that voice message and >> of this e-mail is to get clarification on the correct interpretation of the >> 100% requirement that both congressman Oberstar and the Administration are >> constantly referring to in public. >> >> Talgo is the first train manufacturer that has been awarded a contract to >> manufacture trains using ARRA funds granted through the FTA. That agency >> requires that 60% of the components (Air conditioning equipment, doors, >> seats, etc) be manufactured in the USA. In order for a component to qualify >> as built in the USA it has to meet two tests: (i) that the final assembly >> takes place in the USA and (ii) that 60% of the components are manufactured >> in the USA. These guidelines have been used for years by the manufacturers of >> trains and by the vendors of components and allows to buy build trains using >> parts that are not built in the USA, which in many cases cannot be found in >> the USA. >> >> Now an unclear request of 100% Buy America is required from manufacturers. If >> the guidelines of the FTA are applicable to the 100% request, then 100% of >> the components and 100% of the subcomponents should be built in the USA. The >> vendors we are dealing with tell us that such goal in unattainable because it >> would, in essence mean, that each bolt, screw, etc. would have to be made in >> the US. Everyone understands a lot of components of parts manufactured in >> the US come from other countries like China etc. . >> >> Talgo takes its commitments very seriously. Therefore , we are seeking >> clarification on the 100% request to determine if it is worth to stay in a >> market that has funds available but that will never be used due to the >> conditions set to grant them. >> >> Since Congressman Oberstar was the author of the ARRA language, we are hoping >> that the intent of the language will be clarified. We a quick response >> because various states are asking us whether or not we can meet the ARRA >> requirement but we don't know what 100% really means as vendors don't even >> built parts that are 100% American. >> >> Could it mean that if the components are "mostly American" as in 80%, then it >> is considered to pass the 100% Buy America. >> >> Please clarify with Mr. Oberstar. We did not hear back about Talgo's >> willingness to establish a "US Training Work Force" either from Mr. Oberstar. >> >> I look forward to hearing from you or speaking with Mr. Oberstar on the phone >> again as soon as possible for him. Thank you Antonio Perez President & CEO Cell: +1-202-286-0622
METADATA:
THREAD:
TOPIC:
Please review
INDEX:
Acr7yCLWeMxzrgU6l06z/Ldn3EvR4Q==