EMAIL DETAILS
SUBJECT:
draft letter(s) - please call to discuss
PRI: NORMAL
FROM:
J
jbiden@lionhallgp.com
DATE:
2017-06-14 20:52:46
MSG_ID:
<DDFD75B0-D64D-4E16-A6EC-DE4FA6D015D2@lionhallgp.com>
RECIPIENTS:
TO:
R
rhb@rspdc.com
CONTENT:
TEXT: YES |
HTML: NO
PROCESSED
I had Sara clean up James' letter a bit. See if you like the changes. In addition to being more grammatically correct, the tone puts you back in charge. The format is still a bit weird, but I think it’s fine — it looks more like a memo. The second more personal letter is necessary, I believe, to bring us back to square one with the Chairman. This is for your eyes only. Please call to discuss and I will explain my reasoning. There is a method to my madness. To state the obvious, if you don’t agree, you can handle as you deem appropriate.
METADATA:
THREAD:
TOPIC:
draft letter(s) - please call to discuss
INDEX:
AQHS5VAtQIDTeMlzkkCHUQ0YoAuE6A==