EMAIL DETAILS
SUBJECT:
Re: E-Mails Suggest JPMorgan Knew Flaws of Some Loans
PRI: NORMAL
FROM:
S
smacklera@gmail.com
DATE:
2013-02-07 14:25:21
MSG_ID:
<CAPudD-Yp0M_AybdmjqJmi_AGZFUu0HSNJU-8rZz0ZbZ9PER4Xw@mail.gmail.com>
RECIPIENTS:
TO:
T
tedkaufman@comcast.net
CC:
2
Jim Smith
<261penn@gmail.com>
E
Eric Schwerin
<eschwerin@rosemontseneca.com>
H
Hunter Biden
<hbiden@rosemontseneca.com>
M
molly@beaubiden.com
CONTENT:
TEXT: YES |
HTML: YES
PROCESSED
Here's hoping JPMC avoids settlement long enough that Dexia discovers some things that'll give DOJ no choice but to pursue. On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 9:23 AM, <tedkaufman@comcast.net> wrote: > It is absolutely amazing that a private litigant could uncover all this > and DOJ could not. Clearer and clearer that it just was not a DOJ priority. > > Good news is that in the RBS case they successfully brought a criminal > case and said they are going after criminal cases against traders. NYT > points out that RBS and UBS are the "first units of a big bank to agree to > criminal charges in more than a decade" > > ------------------------------ > *From: *molly@beaubiden.com > *To: *"Jim Smith" <261penn@gmail.com>, "Hunter Biden" < > hbiden@rosemontseneca.com>, "Ted Kaufman" <tedkaufman@comcast.net>, "Eric > Schwerin" <eschwerin@rosemontseneca.com>, "Alexander Snyder-Mackler" < > smacklera@gmail.com> > *Sent: *Thursday, February 7, 2013 8:18:53 AM > *Subject: *E-Mails Suggest JPMorgan Knew Flaws of Some Loans > > > DEALBOOK > E-Mails Suggest JPMorgan Knew Flaws of Some Loans > [image: Jamie Dimon, chief of JPMorgan Chase.] > **Jamie Dimon, chief of JPMorgan Chase. > YURI GRIPAS/REUTERS > > By JESSICA SILVER-GREENBERG > > When an outside analysis uncovered serious flaws with thousands of home > loans, JPMorgan Chase<http://dealbook.on.nytimes.com/public/overview?symbol=JPM&inline=nyt-org> executives > found an easy fix. > > Rather than disclosing the full extent of problems like fraudulent home > appraisals and overextended borrowers, the bank adjusted the critical > reviews, according to documents filed early Tuesday in federal court in > Manhattan. As a result, the mortgages, which JPMorgan bundled into complex > securities, appeared healthier, making the deals more appealing to > investors. > > The trove of internal e-mails and employee interviews, filed as part of a > lawsuit by one of the investors in the securities, offers a fresh glimpse > into Wall Street's mortgage machine, which churned out billions of dollars > of securities that later imploded. The documents reveal that JPMorgan, as > well as two firms the bank acquired during the credit crisis, Washington > Mutual<http://topics.nytimes.com/top/news/business/companies/washington_mutual_inc/index.html?inline=nyt-org> > and Bear Stearns<http://topics.nytimes.com/top/news/business/companies/bear_stearns_companies/index.html?inline=nyt-org>, > flouted quality controls and ignored problems, sometimes hiding them > entirely, in a quest for profit. > > The lawsuit, which was filed by Dexia, a Belgian-French bank, is being > closely watched on Wall Street. After suffering significant losses, Dexia > sued JPMorgan and its affiliates in 2012, claiming it had been duped into > buying $1.6 billion of troubled mortgage-backed securities. The latest > documents could provide a window into a $200 billion case that looms over > the entire industry. In that lawsuit, the Federal Housing Finance Agency, > which oversees Fannie Mae<http://dealbook.on.nytimes.com/public/overview?symbol=FNMA&inline=nyt-org> > and Freddie Mac<http://dealbook.on.nytimes.com/public/overview?symbol=FMCC&inline=nyt-org>, > has accused 17 banks of selling dubious mortgage securities to the two > housing giants. At least 20 of the securities are also highlighted in the > Dexia case, according to an analysis of court records. > > In court filings, JPMorgan has strongly denied wrongdoing and is > contesting both cases in federal court. The bank declined to comment. > > Dexia's lawsuit is part of a broad assault on Wall Street for its role in > the 2008 financial crisis, as prosecutors, regulators and private investors > take aim at mortgage-related securities. New York's attorney general, Eric > T. Schneiderman<http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/people/s/eric_t_schneiderman/index.html?inline=nyt-per>, > sued JPMorgan last year over investments created by Bear Stearns between > 2005 and 2007. > > Jamie Dimon<http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/people/d/james_dimon/index.html?inline=nyt-per>, > JPMorgan's chief executive, has criticized prosecutors for attacking > JPMorgan because of what Bear Stearns did. Speaking at the Council on > Foreign Relations<http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/organizations/c/council_on_foreign_relations/index.html?inline=nyt-org> in > October, Mr. Dimon said the bank did the federal government "a favor" by > rescuing the flailing firm in 2008. > > The legal onslaught has been costly. In November, JPMorgan, the nation's > largest bank, agreed to pay $296.9 million to settle claims by the Securities > and Exchange Commission<http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/organizations/s/securities_and_exchange_commission/index.html?inline=nyt-org> that > Bear Stearns had misled mortgage investors by hiding some delinquent loans. > JPMorgan did not admit or deny wrongdoing. > > "The true price tag for the ongoing costs of the litigation is > terrifying," said Christopher Whalen, a senior managing director at Tangent > Capital Partners. > > The Dexia lawsuit centers on complex securities created by JPMorgan, Bear > Stearns and Washington Mutual during the housing boom. As profits soared, > the Wall Street firms scrambled to pump out more investments, even as > questions emerged about their quality. > > With a seemingly insatiable appetite, JPMorgan scooped up mortgages from > lenders with troubled records, according to the court documents. In an > internal "due diligence scorecard," JPMorgan ranked large mortgage > originators, assigning Washington Mutual andAmerican Home Mortgage<http://topics.nytimes.com/top/news/business/companies/american_home_mortgage_investment_corporation/index.html?inline=nyt-org> the > lowest grade of "poor" for their documentation, the court filings show. > > The loans were quickly sold to investors. Describing the investment > assembly line, an executive at Bear Stearns told employees "we are a moving > company not a storage company," according to the court documents. > > As they raced to produce mortgage-backed securities, Washington Mutual and > Bear Stearns also scaled back their quality controls, the documents > indicate. > > In an initiative called Project Scarlett, Washington Mutual slashed its > due diligence staff by 25 percent as part of an effort to bolster profit. > Such steps "tore the heart out" of quality controls, according to a > November 2007 e-mail from a Washington Mutual executive. Executives who > pushed back endured "harassment" when they tried to "keep our discipline > and controls in place," the e-mail said. > > Even when flaws were flagged, JPMorgan and the other firms sometimes > overlooked the warnings. > > JPMorgan routinely hired Clayton Holdings and other third-party firms to > examine home loans before they were packed into investments. Combing > through the mortgages, the firms searched for problems like borrowers who > had vastly overstated their incomes or appraisals that inflated property > values. > > According to the court documents, an analysis for JPMorgan in September > 2006 found that "nearly half of the sample pool" - or 214 loans - were > "defective," meaning they did not meet the underwriting standards. The > borrowers' incomes, the firms found, were dangerously low relative to the > size of their mortgages. Another troubling report in 2006 discovered that > thousands of borrowers had already fallen behind on their payments. > > But JPMorgan at times dismissed the critical assessments or altered them, > the documents show. Certain JPMorgan employees, including the bankers who > assembled the mortgages and the due diligence managers, had the power to > ignore or veto bad reviews. > > In some instances, JPMorgan executives reduced the number of loans > considered delinquent, the documents show. In others, the executives > altered the assessments so that a smaller number of loans were considered > "defective." > > In a 2007 e-mail, titled "Banking overrides," a JPMorgan due diligence > manager asks a banker: "How do you want to handle these loans?" At times, > they whitewashed the findings, the documents indicate. In 2006, for > example, a review of mortgages found that at least 1,154 loans were more > than 30 days delinquent. The offering documents sent to investors showed > only 25 loans as delinquent. > > A person familiar with the bank's portfolios said JPMorgan had reviewed > the loans separately and determined that the number of delinquent loans was > far less than the outside analysis had found. > > At Bear Stearns and Washington Mutual, employees also had the power to > sanitize bad assessments. Employees at Bear Stearns were told that they > were responsible for "purging all of the older reports" that showed flaws, > "leaving only the final reports," according to the court documents. > > Such actions were designed to bolster profit. In a deposition, a > Washington Mutual employee said revealing loan defects would undermine the > lucrative business, and that the bank would suffer "a couple-point hit in > price." > > Ratings agencies also did not necessarily get a complete picture of the > investments, according to the court filings. An assessment of the loans in > one security revealed that 24 percent of the sample was "materially > defective," the filings show. After exercising override power, a JPMorgan > employee sent a report in May 2006 to a ratings agency that showed only 5.3 > percent of the mortgages were defective. > > Such investments eventually collapsed, spreading losses across the > financial system. > > Dexia, which has been bailed out twice since the financial crisis, lost > $774 million on mortgage-backed securities, according to court records. > > Mr. Schneiderman, the New York attorney general, said that overall losses > from flawed mortgage-backed securities from 2005 and 2007 were $22.5 > billion. > > In a statement shortly after he sued JPMorgan Chase, Mr. Schneiderman said > the lawsuit was a template "for future actions against issuers of > residential mortgage-backed securities that defrauded investors and cost > millions of Americans their homes." > > > Sent via iPhone > > -- Alexander Snyder Mackler (302) 598-867
METADATA:
THREAD:
INDEX:
Adhhn5bnT+l8XidIQxmowjkWmexgdA==
REFERENCES:
REPLY_TO:
<1264343108.535556.1360246992512.JavaMail.root@sz0188a.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net>
REFS:
<3CB708A0-9202-4490-9EE8-3782F2A30501@beaubiden.com>
<1264343108.535556.1360246992512.JavaMail.root@sz0188a.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net>