EMAIL DETAILS
SUBJECT:
Preview of Opposition Should We Do NEC HSR Work
PRI: NORMAL
FROM:
E
eschwerin@rosemontseneca.com
DATE:
2011-02-15 13:42:27
MSG_ID:
<3EE5377A-0676-446A-B906-E47DB6E59A23@rosemontseneca.com>
RECIPIENTS:
TO:
H
Hunter Biden
<hbiden@rosemontseneca.com>
M
Michael Muldoon
<mmuldoon@rosemontseneca.com>
CONTENT:
TEXT: YES |
HTML: YES
PROCESSED
RSS FEED AMERICAN.COM The Journal of the American Enterprise Institute Sign up for the DAILY AMERICAN.COM NEWSLETTER « Iranians Demonstrate against DictatorshipAmerica’s Voice May Need More Speech Therapy » The High Cost of Gravy Trains By Jay Weiser February 14, 2011, 1:17 pm Notwithstanding his proposal to spend $53 billion on an upgraded national passenger rail system, Vice President Joseph Biden is the problem, not the solution. Each weekday, 30 Amtrak Acela express trains stop in Wilmington, Delaware, despite a 2006 population of only 72,826, perhaps because it used to shave 14 minutes off Biden’s commute from Washington, D.C. as a senator, compared to the Northeast Regional. The more stops, the longer the trip, and the less attractive the train is, compared to other transportation modes. Biden wasn’t the worst offender, since Wilmington is a significant business center. The late Senator Robert Byrd required Amtrak to maintain passenger service to ten West Virginia towns, including Thurmond (with a population of seven last census; $43 for a 7.5-hour trip from Washington, D.C.). Amtrak also stops in Harper’s Ferry (a 2000 population of 307; $14 from Washington), where John Brown led his raid, giving rise to the Civil War song: John Brown’s body lies a-mouldering in the grave, His soul’s marching on! Senator Byrd’s pork is marching on. Pew Subsidyscope measured Amtrak’s loss per passenger at $32 in 2008, though Acela made a $41 per passenger profit. The Sunset Limited (New Orleans to Los Angeles) lost a whopping $462 per passenger. And, ominously, given the Obama administration’s West Coast high-speed rail plans, the Coast Starlight (Los Angeles to Seattle) loses $136 per passenger. Even in the heavily traveled Northeast Corridor, true high-speed rail (which involves dedicated high-tech tracks and rolling stock) would draw only 3.7 million additional passengers by 2030 compared to an upgraded Acela, according to Amtrak. Though it claims 10.3 million additional passengers by 2040, the benefits of an upgraded Acela will max out. The problem is the cost. Using Amtrak’s own projections, the $117 billion (2010 dollars) in infrastructure spending needed for true Northeast Corridor high-speed rail would produce an annual $900 million operating surplus (a princely 0.77 percent annual return). Applying Amtrak’s 7 percent discount rate, true high-speed rail would barely pay for itself (a 1.05 benefit-cost ratio), even though Amtrak includes in the benefits hard-to-measure positive externalities such as travel time savings, energy benefits, commuter network benefits, air system impacts, and market productivity benefits. Sounds (slightly) good so far. But Amtrak apparently doesn’t include financing costs in its capital cost estimate, which over a 40-year period would be huge. Large public construction projects typically have minimum cost overruns of 30 percent as well as long delays (witness Boston’s Big Dig). The eminent domain litigation for new rights of way across nine states and the District of Columbia would take at least a decade. It often results in vastly higher payments to property-owners than projected, as in New York City’s Times Square project. And if political pressure requires every high-speed rail train to stop in Wilmington and other small cities, many of high-speed rail’s time-saving benefits will evaporate. Given the risk of eminent domain, construction overruns, ridership, and positive externality overestimates, a 7 percent discount rate appears wildly optimistic. Since costs are frontloaded and benefits only become significant after 2030, a higher, more realistic discount rate would turn the project into a deficit black hole—even before including financing costs. That’s why the public shouldn’t back expensive, risky projects unless the projected benefit-cost ratio going in, using a discount rate applicable to a risky private development project, is at least 2.5. Biden did not call for a rationalization of Amtrak’s routes, according to the press reports. He apparently didn’t even invite his son, lobbyist and former Amtrak Board of Directors Vice Chairman Hunter Biden, to participate in his announcement. The $53 billion could pay for nonstop high-speed rail shuttle service between Washington, D.C., and Wilmington every 10 minutes, but that doesn’t make it a good investment. ShareThis Email to Author | Permalink | Categories: Economic Policy, Energy and Environment About the Enterprise Blog The Enterprise Blog is a project of the American Enterprise Institute. We are committed to giving you thoughtful and timely analysis on economic, foreign and social policy and politics. Check back often for updates. Categories Economic Policy (1238) Energy and Environment (233) Entrepreneurship (32) Financial Services (34) Fiscal Policy and Taxes (79) Media and Technology (81) Monetary Policy (21) Regulation (81) Retirement and Social Security (103) Trade (54) Education (203) Foreign and Defense (676) Africa (9) Asia Pacific (81) Development (16) Europe and Russia (47) Latin America (14) South Asia (30) War on Terror (140) General (232) Health Policy (221) Global Health (40) Law and the Constitution (68) Supreme Court (20) Politics and Public Opinion (395) Society and Culture (341) Uncategorized (38) Authors Abigail Haddad (1) Adam Paul (8) Ahmad Majidyar (2) Alan Viard (15) Alan Viard and Amy Roden (1) Alex Brill (7) Alex Brill and Aparna Mathur (1) Alex J. Pollock (29) Ali Alfoneh (27) Allan H. Meltzer (5) Amy Roden and Alex Brill (1) Andrew Biggs (125) Andrew Biggs and Adam Paul (1) Andrew Kelly (11) Andrew Rugg (15) Andrew Rugg and Jane Makin (2) Andrew Rugg and Lauren Hitt (3) Andrew Smarick (61) Aparna Mathur (1) Aparna Mathur and Rohan Poojara (2) Apoorva Shah (25) Apoorva Shah and Maseh Zarif (1) Arthur C. Brooks (13) Arthur Herman (2) Blake Hurst (1) Carmela Aquino (1) Charles Murray (62) Charlie Szrom (3) Cheryl Miller (14) Chris DeMuth (1) Chris Harnisch (2) Christopher J. Conover (1) Claude Barfield (31) Daniel Blumenthal (4) Daniel Bowen (1) Daniel Lautzenheiser (3) Daniel Lautzenheiser and Jenna Schuette (1) Danielle Pletka (133) Danielle Pletka and Katherine Faley (1) Danielle Pletka and Thomas Donnelly (1) David B. Rivkin Jr. and Lee A. Casey (1) David Peyton (1) Desmond Lachman (11) Donald Rumsfeld (1) Douglas Smith (11) Edward Blum (5) Emily Putze (1) Evan Sparks (1) Frederick M. Hess (45) Frederick W. Kagan (2) Gabriel Sudduth (1) Gardner Peckham (6) Gary Schmitt (78) Gary Schmitt and Cheryl Miller (2) Gary Schmitt and Philipp Tomio (2) Gary Schmitt and Thomas M. Donnelly (1) Gordon Hanson (1) Greg Brooks (1) Henry Olsen (20) Jackson Toby (1) James DeLong (25) James Warren (1) Jason Richwine (16) Jay Richards (192) Jay Weiser (5) Jeffrey Azarva (1) Jenna Schuette (6) Jennifer Marsico (14) Jennifer Marsico and Will Schultz (1) Jessica Leval and Jennifer Marsico (1) John Bolton (4) John E. Calfee (6) John Fortier (22) John Makin (2) John Yoo (11) Jon Entine (6) Jon Flugstad (2) Jonah Goldberg (38) Joseph Antos (9) Joseph Loconte (1) Joshua Gilder (1) Joy Pavelski (1) Kara Flook (8) Karlyn Bowman (56) Karlyn Bowman and Andrew Rugg (5) Katherine Faley (1) Katherine Zimmerman (3) Kenneth P. Green (85) Kenneth P. Green and Steven F. Hayward (1) Kevin Hassett (4) Kevin Hassett and Aparna Mathur (1) Kevin R. Kosar (1) Kevin Rothrock (1) Kyndra Rotunda (1) Lee Lane (4) Leon Aron (2) Leon Aron and Kevin Rothrock (2) Leon Kass (1) Leslie Forgach (2) Lynne Cheney (1) Madeline Zavodny (1) Marc Thiessen (132) Mark J. Perry (99) Mark Kirk (1) Mark Kubisch (1) Mark O'Keefe (2) Mark Schneider (13) Maseh Zarif (2) Mauro De Lorenzo (1) Michael Auslin (76) Michael Barone (9) Michael Greve (3) Michael Mazza (8) Michael Mukasey (1) Michael Novak (2) Michael Pratt (2) Michael Rubin (19) Neena Shenai (18) Newt Gingrich (25) Nicholas Eberstadt (2) Nick Eberstadt and Apoorva Shah (5) Nick Schulz (439) Norman J. Ornstein (9) Olivia Meeks (2) Paul B. Rester (1) Paul Wolfowitz (7) Rep. Pete Hoekstra (1) Peter Wehner (2) Peter J. Wallison (21) Philip Babcock (1) Philip I. Levy (29) Phillip Swagel (1) Political Corner (1) Ralph Kinney Bennett (3) Reza Jan (2) Robin Currie (1) Roger Bate (49) Roger Noriega (15) Rohan Poojara (8) Rohan Poojara and Oliver Sherouse (1) Rohit Parulkar (1) Ryan Lirette (4) Ryan Streeter (20) Sadanand Dhume (7) Sally Satel (3) Scott Gottlieb (4) Scott Harrington (9) Senator John Cornyn (1) Sherif Mansour (1) Stephen Parente (1) Steven F. Hayward (34) Steven F. Hayward and Hiwa Alaghebandian (1) The Editors (265) Thomas P. Miller (14) Tim Sullivan (1) Tom Donnelly (12) Tom Miller and James C. Capretta (1) Trey Hicks (4) Vaclav Smil (4) Vincent Reinhart (12) Walton Dumas (1) Whitney Downs (1) William Inboden (5) Wistar Wilson (1) Archives February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 HOME ABOUT US ARCHIVE BLOG DONATE AEI.ORG SITEMAP BACK TO TOP Eric D. Schwerin Rosemont Seneca Partners, LLC 1010 Wisconsin Ave., NW Suite 705 Washington, DC 20007 (202) 333-1880 eschwerin@rosemontseneca.com P Consider the environment before printing this email.
METADATA:
THREAD:
INDEX:
AdhhoJrVGRGsuvgGTESiwZmpLCkAZg==