EMAIL DETAILS
SUBJECT:
FW: Office of Vice President Biden Intelligence Briefing for Friday, September 7, 2018
PRI: NORMAL
FROM:
K
kchung@vpbiden.org
DATE:
2018-09-07 13:04:01
MSG_ID:
<69baf8cc6c45b42afb8ae97c45748cef@mail.gmail.com>
RECIPIENTS:
TO:
H
Valerie Biden Owens
<hurricane5155@gmail.com>
J
Jimmy Biden
<jbiden@lionhallgp.com>
J
Jill Tracy Biden
<jill.tracy2@gmail.com>
R
Hunter Biden
<rhbdc@icloud.com>
T
Ashley Blazer Biden
<trailblazerbiden@gmail.com>
CONTENT:
TEXT: YES |
HTML: YES
PROCESSED
Office of Vice President Biden Intelligence Briefing *From:* Bulletin Intelligence <Biden@BulletinIntelligence.com> *Sent:* Friday, September 7, 2018 7:48 AM *To:* Biden@BulletinIntelligence.com *Subject:* Office of Vice President Biden Intelligence Briefing for Friday, September 7, 2018 *Click to access <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018090701biden&r=email-01f2&l=000-123&t=c> mobile-optimized online version, including download options and an audio reader.* [image: Image removed by sender. Office of Vice President Biden Intelligence Briefing] <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018090701biden&r=email-01f2&l=001-785&t=c> *To: Vice President Joe Biden* *Friday, September 7, 2018 8:00 AM EDT* Today's Table of Contents *Biden in the News <#SECTION_1>* • Bidens Join Veterans Completing Walk Across US To Draw Attention To Mental Health Fight. <#S1> • Biden’s “Deplorables” Remark Viewed As Possible “Swipe” At Clinton. <#S2> • Jashinsky: Nominating Biden Could Slow Democrats’ “Rapid Drift Leftward.” <#S3> *Leading the News <#SECTION_2>* • Media Analyses: Op-Ed Vindicates Belief “Deep State” Working To Undermine Trump. <#S4> *Foreign Policy <#SECTION_3>* • Trump Welcomes Kim Saying He Wants Denuclearization In Trump’s First Term. <#S5> • Trump Says UNWRA Cuts Are Bargaining Chip In Middle East Peace Talks. <#S6> • US, UK, France, Germany, Canada Unite In Response To Russian Nerve Agent Attack. <#S7> • US Official: Trump “Not In A Hurry” To Withdraw From Syria. <#S8> • US, India Sign Military Agreement While Mattis, Pompeo In New Delhi. <#S9> • Multiple Attacks Leave At Least 40 Dead In Afghanistan. <#S10> • Democrats Warn They’ll Block Any NAFTA Deal That Doesn’t Include Canada. <#S11> *Domestic Policy <#SECTION_4>* • Media Analyses: Kavanaugh “On Track” For Confirmation. <#S12> • DHS Proposes Holding Families Seeking Asylum Until Requests Are Heard. <#S13> • Federal Prosecutors Using Grand Jury To Investigate McCabe. <#S14> • Poll: Nike Favorability Falls After Kaepernick Ad. <#S15> • Study: Attorneys Say They Face Racial, Gender Bias At Work. <#S16> • DeVos Will Leave Use Of Federal Funds For School Gun Purchases Up To States. <#S17> • Senate Reaches Deal On Opioid Crisis Bill. <#S18> • Carper Defeats Harris 65%-35% In Delaware Democratic Primary. <#S19> *Cancer Research <#SECTION_5>* • Single Drug May Be Able To Target All Tumors After Cancer Spreads. <#S20> • CAR T-Cell Immunotherapy Advancing With New Studies, Approvals. <#S21> *Editorials/Op-Eds <#SECTION_6>* • New York Times. <#S22> • Washington Post. <#S23> Biden in the News Bidens Join Veterans Completing Walk Across US To Draw Attention To Mental Health Fight. The AP <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018090701biden&r=email-01f2&l=002-c95&t=c> (9/6, Groves) reports, “Six American and British veterans who walked across the US to raise awareness about mental health problems related to combat service finished their trip Thursday in New York City, where they were met by former Vice President Joe Biden and his wife, Jill. The group visited the national Sept. 11 memorial at the World Trade Center and then finished their trip a few blocks away, at a garden that memorializes British victims of the 2001 terror attacks.” Addressing “a small crowd,” Joe Biden said, “They’re saving lives by this walk. Every city they went into, you can be certain as they walked there’s a wounded warrior looking who is suffering and thinking, ‘If they can do this and let the whole world see it, maybe I should come forward and say I need help.’” The New York Daily News <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018090701biden&r=email-01f2&l=003-54f&t=c> (9/6, McShane) reports that Biden emphasized “how much works still lies ahead to help our veterans. ‘They need help,’ said the ex-veep. ‘It takes courage to come out and say, ‘Look, I’m battling.’ Three-hundred-thousand have come home struggling.’ Jill Biden recalled her son Beau returning from his deployment to Iraq and talking about ‘the struggles in the men and women he served beside. Our troops don’t just fight together, they recover together, too.’” In an online article, WPIX-TV <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018090701biden&r=email-01f2&l=004-25b&t=c> New York (9/6, Ford) reported that as he was completing the walk with the veterans, Biden said, “We have a moral obligation to take care of all of these people. What it reminds me of is the sacrifice that our son made, the sacrifice that all these guys made, and these women made.” WPIX-TV added, “The trek, called The Walk of America, was sponsored by the veterans’ organization Walking With the Wounded, a joint UK-US charity, whose main patron is Prince Harry, the Duke of Sussex.” In a broadcast, WNYW-TV[image: Image removed by sender. Video] <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018090701biden&r=email-01f2&l=005-8d4&t=c> New York (9/6) reported that Jill Biden “is the US patron of the group made up of Americans and Brits.” Prior to completing the walk, the veterans and Jill Biden appeared on NBC’s TODAY[image: Image removed by sender. Video] <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018090701biden&r=email-01f2&l=006-190&t=c> (9/6), where they discussed the effort to raise awareness about mental health issues suffered by military members. Asked, “What is this effort all about?”, Biden was shown saying, “This effort is all about mental health. These amazing wounded warriors walked across America to tell their stories, to create awareness. One-in-five Americans deal with mental health. And so, they’re bringing their stories to light to bring depression out of the darkness into the light.” Also offering broadcasts about yesterday’s events were on WPIX-TV[image: Image removed by sender. Video] <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018090701biden&r=email-01f2&l=007-9ff&t=c> New York (9/6), WABC-TV[image: Image removed by sender. Video] <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018090701biden&r=email-01f2&l=008-306&t=c> New York (9/6), WNBC-TV[image: Image removed by sender. Video] <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018090701biden&r=email-01f2&l=009-39e&t=c> New York (9/6), and a second report from WPIX-TV[image: Image removed by sender. Video] <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018090701biden&r=email-01f2&l=00a-856&t=c> New York (9/7). Biden’s “Deplorables” Remark Viewed As Possible “Swipe” At Clinton. On Thursday, MSNBC’s Morning Joe[image: Image removed by sender. Video] <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018090701biden&r=email-01f2&l=00b-368&t=c> (9/6) showed a clip of former Vice President Joe Biden saying of the economy and the middle class, “A lot of people are scared. And they’re not deplorables. They’re simple people – they’re people I grew up with. They’re not stupid. They understand we’re in the midst of a fundamental industrial change.” Host Mika Brzezinski described Biden’s remarks as a possible “swipe at Hillary Clinton’s ‘basket of deplorables’ comment from the 2016 campaign.” Asked about the possibility, NBC News reporter Heidi Przybyla said, “It’s possible. Joe Biden speaks his mind and that is something that in the past was considered a negative, but in this environment, not so much.” Brzezinski, Przybyla, Joe Scarborough, Mike Barnicle, and Willie Geist went on to discuss Biden’s appeal versus that of Hillary Clinton’s in the Rust Belt. Jashinsky: Nominating Biden Could Slow Democrats’ “Rapid Drift Leftward.” Writing for the Washington Examiner <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018090701biden&r=email-01f2&l=00c-a6f&t=c> (9/6), Emily Jashinsky said, “With far-left candidates like Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez on the rise, some Democrats are probably hoping Joe Biden’s brand of center-left populism will make a comeback. The best way to do that is” selecting Biden as the 2020 Democratic presidential nominee. Jashinsky discussed the Biden’s Wednesday speech in New Jersey in support of House hopeful Mikie Sherrill (D-NJ), then added, “For Democrats, nominating Biden could have the appeal of killing two birds with one stone – slowing the party’s rapid drift leftward, and recapturing some appeal with the blue collar voters Trump was able to sway. The question would be whether that leftward drift has already swept away any chance for Biden to succeed in the primaries.” Leading the News Media Analyses: Op-Ed Vindicates Belief “Deep State” Working To Undermine Trump. While the tone of the coverage in some of the media remains very negative toward President Trump, reports and analyses – particularly but not exclusively in conservative outlets – also point out that the anonymous New York Times op-ed purportedly written by a disgruntled senior Administration official in effect confirms conservative complaints about a group in the government actively working to undermine Trump and block the implementation of his agenda. That may be the case even though, as Abby Phillips reported from the White House on CNN’s New Day[image: Image removed by sender. Video] <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018090701biden&r=email-01f2&l=00d-45a&t=c> (9/6), “it is very likely that the ‘deep state’ might include people that” Trump “put into the jobs they currently hold.” A number of analysts also contend the anonymous anti-Trump official actually undermined her or his own stated objectives by publishing the op-ed. Politico <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018090701biden&r=email-01f2&l=00e-e34&t=c> (9/6, Everett, Johnson) reports “many Republicans on Capitol Hill and in the White House privately agree with the” Times op-ed, but “they also say the anonymous anti-Trump screed was a tremendous setback when it comes to curbing the president’s worst impulses.” These unnamed “Republicans” said yesterday “that the Times piece only amps up the president’s paranoia by handing him proof that members of his own team are working against him, according to interviews with more than a dozen Republicans, including nine senators.” In a piece for The Atlantic <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018090701biden&r=email-01f2&l=00f-d16&t=c> (9/6), Trump critic David Frum says the author “is hoping to vindicate the reputation of like-minded senior Trump staffers,” but has actually just “throw[n] the government...into even more dangerous turmoil,” and “empowered the president’s willfulness.” Frum adds that “the author of the Times op-ed has explicitly told the president that those who offer such advice do not have the president’s best interests at heart and are, in fact, actively subverting his best interests as he understands them on behalf of ideas of their own.” Fox News’ Fox & Friends[image: Image removed by sender. Video] <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018090701biden&r=email-01f2&l=010-893&t=c> (9/6) covered the effect of the op-ed by “the Trump traitor,” as Steve Doocy branded the author, in its lead segment. The Washington Post’s Marc Thiessen was shown saying that the “‘deep state’ just confessed” to “undermining democracy.” Doocy added, “It goes to my earlier point about the permanent government. We have been hearing about that and about the deep state, and this guy...has confessed.” Thiessen writes in his Washington Post <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018090701biden&r=email-01f2&l=011-578&t=c> (9/6) column this morning, “The ‘deep state’ exists after all.” Addressing himself to the op-ed writer, Thiessen says “there is no constitutional option of staying on the job and pretending to be a loyal adviser, while secretly undermining the president by failing to carry out his decisions – no matter how bad you think those decisions are.” Tucker Carlson said on Fox News’ Tucker Carlson Tonight[image: Image removed by sender. Video] <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018090701biden&r=email-01f2&l=012-a07&t=c> (9/6), “Donald Trump has complained for months that the permanent class in Washington is working in secret to undermine his presidency. Virtually everyone in Washington thinks of that is hilarious. ... But suddenly they are not saying that anymore. Why? Because yesterday afternoon the New York Times ran anonymous op-ed that confirmed every single one of Trump’s supposedly paranoid claims, and many more. It turns out that executive branch employees are, in fact, working secretly to stop the President’s agenda.” Former National Security Advisor to the President Michael Anton said on Fox News’ Tucker Carlson Tonight[image: Image removed by sender. Video] <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018090701biden&r=email-01f2&l=013-3ba&t=c> (9/6), “The narrative immediately shifted from ‘the President is crazy for saying this and believing it’ to ‘well, the President has it coming, he deserves the deep state undermining him.’” When asked on CNN’s Anderson Cooper 360[image: Image removed by sender. Video] <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018090701biden&r=email-01f2&l=014-d3e&t=c> (9/6), “Is it possible it actually plays into the President’s hands and the notion he’s surrounded by people who are trying to thwart his will, his agenda?” journalist Carl Bernstein replied, “It does, or it can, because, indeed, one of his themes and those of people around him, has been that there is a deep state conspiracy against President Trump. And that theme is being repeated because of this.” CNN political commentator Jason Miller said on CNN’s Cuomo Prime Time[image: Image removed by sender. Video] <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018090701biden&r=email-01f2&l=015-071&t=c> (9/6), “This was effectively a soft coup, saying that there are a number of people that are actively working against the President of the United States and against what he’s trying to implement while supposedly working for him.” Byron York of the Washington Examiner <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018090701biden&r=email-01f2&l=016-0ce&t=c> (9/6, York) agrees with others that the op-ed is effectively “a confession that there is a deep state conspiracy to subvert” Trump, and Alex Lockie of Business Insider <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018090701biden&r=email-01f2&l=017-7d2&t=c> (9/6), in a column titled “New York Times Confirms ‘Deep State’ Boogeyman, Boosts Conspiracies,” writes, “The idea that a shadowy cabal of unelected bureaucrats secretly runs the US – against the demonstrated will of the people and without their knowledge – has long been the stuff of conspiracy theories,” but “the New York Times gave a gift to those who believe it.” The Washington Post <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018090701biden&r=email-01f2&l=018-602&t=c> (9/6, Jaffe) reports on “a vexing reality for Trump – that some in his employ do treat him as an adolescent in need of chaperoning inside a White House that” Sen. Bob Corker (R-TN) “memorably once described as ‘adult day care.’” Yet “the conspiratorial and at times paranoid Trump felt a slice of vindication reading the Times column, seeing it as justifying his belief that the ‘deep state’ and other enemies within are seeking to undercut him, according to two former White House officials briefed on the president’s private conversations.” On NBC’s Today[image: Image removed by sender. Video] <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018090701biden&r=email-01f2&l=019-796&t=c> (9/6), former CIA director John Brennan said, “What the author wrote is wholly consistent with all the reports that we have seen over the last year. ... It’s active insubordination. ... This is not sustainable, to have an executive branch where individuals are not following the orders of the chief executive.” The Washington Post <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018090701biden&r=email-01f2&l=01a-bc1&t=c> (9/6, Telford) refers to the op-ed as “a metaphoric Molotov, a middle finger, a knife in the back,” and the AP <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018090701biden&r=email-01f2&l=01b-43d&t=c> (9/6, Miller, Lucey) says that amid “a ‘House of Cards’-style plot twist in an already over-the-top administration, Trump allies and political insiders scrambled late Wednesday to unmask the writer.” To USA Today <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018090701biden&r=email-01f2&l=01c-9bb&t=c> (9/6, Page), “a storm is gathering,” and “the consequences ahead – the speed and direction of the storm – aren’t set, at least not yet. But the stakes are already pretty clear, and they could include Trump’s presidency.” USA Today adds, however, that “this uproar doesn’t necessarily mean that congressional Republicans or others who have stayed in the president’s corner are about to speak out against him, or more seriously to consider articles of impeachment or the 25th Amendment, both ways to remove a president from power.” Trump “retains the solid support among Republican voters – 89 percent of them in last week’s USA Today/Suffolk University Poll.” RNC Chairwoman Ronna McDaniel writes in a USA Today <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018090701biden&r=email-01f2&l=01d-85d&t=c> (9/6) op-ed, “To the anonymous official who refuses to do your job: You are no hero. You have spoken out against the taxpayers who pay your salary. ... Your identity will come to light, and the American people will soon forget your cowardly act. However, they will long remember the hard work of a president who fights for us, not against us.” Ari Fleischer writes in a USA Today <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018090701biden&r=email-01f2&l=01e-9c0&t=c> (9/6) op-ed that “if staffers can no longer support the president, or as the case with the anonymous author, they doubt the president’s ability to do his job, they need to do the honorable thing and resign.” The AP <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018090701biden&r=email-01f2&l=01f-a1b&t=c> (9/6, Miller, Lucey) reports that “showing her trademark ability to attract attention, former administration official Omarosa Manigault Newman tweeted that clues about the writer’s identity were in her recently released tell-all book, offering a page number: 330.” She “writes on that page: ‘many in this silent army are in his party, his administration, and even in his own family.’” ABC World News Tonight[image: Image removed by sender. Video] <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018090701biden&r=email-01f2&l=020-a20&t=c> (9/6, lead story, 3:55, Karl) reported that, ultimately, “it may be a long time before we find out who wrote this essay. Remember, when it comes to Watergate, it was more than 30 years before we found out who Deep Throat was.” *In Tweet Today, Trump Denounces Woodward Book As “A Scam.” *Trump tweeted <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018090701biden&r=email-01f2&l=021-cc0&t=c> this morning, “The Woodward book is a scam. I don’t talk the way I am quoted. If I did I would not have been elected President. These quotes were made up. The author uses every trick in the book to demean and belittle. I wish the people could see the real facts – and our country is doing GREAT!” Meanwhile, ABC World News Tonight[image: Image removed by sender. Video] <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018090701biden&r=email-01f2&l=022-461&t=c> (9/6, lead story, 3:55, Karl) reported that “as he left the White House” to travel to Montana, “Trump didn’t say a single word about the enemy within,” but he “has been seething.” NBC Nightly News[image: Image removed by sender. Video] <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018090701biden&r=email-01f2&l=023-4b6&t=c> (9/6, story 3, 1:50, Jackson) similarly indicated that “with...Trump on the hunt for his betrayer, multiple sources describe his mood as volcanic, erupting not just over the op-ed but at the Times for publishing it at the first place.” *First Lady Says “Cowardly” Op-Ed Writer “Sabotaging” Country, Not Trump. *USA Today <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018090701biden&r=email-01f2&l=024-7b4&t=c> (9/6, Puente) reports, “First lady Melania Trump stepped into the White House’s war on its anonymous critics, condemning the unnamed writer.” Mrs. Trump wrote, “Unidentified sources have become the majority of the voices people hear about in today’s news. ... People with no names are writing our nation’s history.” The Daily Caller <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018090701biden&r=email-01f2&l=025-926&t=c> (9/6, Enjeti) notes Ms. Trump added, “To the writer of the op-ed – you are not protecting this country; you are sabotaging it with your cowardly actions.” The Washington Examiner <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018090701biden&r=email-01f2&l=026-09d&t=c> (9/6, Yilek) calls it a “fiery statement” by Mrs. Trump, and Politico <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018090701biden&r=email-01f2&l=027-723&t=c> (9/6, Forgey), among other news outlets, also reports the story. *As Top Officials Deny Authoring Op-Ed, Statements Printed And Brought To Trump. *As top Administration officials began issuing statements denying that they authored the op-ed, The Hill <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018090701biden&r=email-01f2&l=028-369&t=c> (9/6, Samuels) reports, “the White House did not immediately respond to questions about whether officials were encouraged to issue denials.” However, CNN <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018090701biden&r=email-01f2&l=029-b9c&t=c> (9/6, Stracqualursi, Zeleny, Acosta) reports that “a top White House official” told CNN that “Trump loves a strongly worded denial, and he is closely watching the string of statements,” which “are being printed out and delivered to the President as they come in.” Jeffrey Toobin said on CNN’s The Lead[image: Image removed by sender. Video] <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018090701biden&r=email-01f2&l=02a-8ed&t=c> (9/6) that Trump “has been reading the leadership guide written by Kim Jong-un, where each person has to pledge their fealty to the dear leader. This idea of each person coming forward bearing the piece of paper, as you did, to say ‘look, look, sir, it wasn’t me.’” The Washington Examiner <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018090701biden&r=email-01f2&l=02b-389&t=c> (9/6, Morrongiello) reports “one White House official described ‘mass distraction’ inside,” as “staffers whispered back and forth about who the ‘traitor’ might be, weighing the cogency of each others’ arguments in between emails and meetings.” The Examiner adds “a person close to the White House suggested an alternative method for discerning if a member of Trump’s Cabinet was guilty, ‘I would circulate one piece of paper to the Cabinet and have everybody sign it, condemning the op-ed and saying they weren’t the author,’” because “what’s happening now [multiple statements from Cabinet officials] prolongs the news cycle.” Jim Acosta said on CNN’s Anderson Cooper 360[image: Image removed by sender. Video] <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018090701biden&r=email-01f2&l=02c-58f&t=c> (9/6), “I can tell you from talking to one Administration official the White House wanted a coordinated response to this earlier” yesterday, but “as they were trying to plan some kind of response, there were all these statements coming out of the woodwork of various cabinet officials and people who work under those cabinet officials and it did take the White House by surprise and they did not seem to be surefooted handling all of this.” Reuters <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018090701biden&r=email-01f2&l=02d-e25&t=c> (9/6, Heavey, Brice) reports that “senior officials” have “disavowed the piece, including Vice President Mike Pence, Secretary of State Mike Pompeo and Defense Secretary James Mattis, while hammering the author for writing it and the Times for publishing it.” According to Reuters, DHS Secretary Nielsen and DNI Coats “were among the favorites on Thursday among gamblers trying their luck online at guessing the author.” However, Nielsen spokesman Tyler Houlton said, “Secretary Nielsen is focused on leading the men and women of DHS and protecting the homeland – not writing anonymous and false opinion pieces for the New York Times.” In addition, UN Ambassador Haley “told reporters she was not the author,” and Treasury Secretary Mnuchin’s spokesman Tony Sayegh “said on Twitter it was ‘laughable to think this could come from the secretary.’” The AP <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018090701biden&r=email-01f2&l=02e-14f&t=c> (9/6, Miller, Lucey, Lemire) reports that “in a rare step,” Jarrod Agen, Pence’s communications director, tweeted, “The Vice President puts his name on his Op-Eds.” USA Today <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018090701biden&r=email-01f2&l=02f-034&t=c> (9/6, Jackson) notes that he added, “The @nytimes should be ashamed and so should the person who wrote the false, illogical, and gutless op-ed. Our office is above such amateur acts.” Bloomberg News <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018090701biden&r=email-01f2&l=030-14e&t=c> (9/6, News) notes “an unidentified Justice Department spokesman was quoted by CNN <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018090701biden&r=email-01f2&l=031-88c&t=c> (9/6, Stracqualursi, Zeleny, Acosta) saying Attorney General Jeff Sessions denied authorship, though Sessions’s spokeswoman declined to comment when contacted by Bloomberg.” The CBS Evening News[image: Image removed by sender. Video] <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018090701biden&r=email-01f2&l=032-1e4&t=c> (9/6, lead story, 2:30, Jiang) reported that “neither...Sessions, nor the Department of Justice have issued an official statement to cross him off the list of suspects, making him one of the only Cabinet members not to do so amid an ongoing feud between Sessions and the President.” The DOJ “referred us to Press Secretary Sarah Sanders’ news statement...calling the writer ‘a gutless loser.’” The Hill <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018090701biden&r=email-01f2&l=033-12c&t=c> (9/6, Samuels) reports that “Coats, who has publicly differed from Trump on matters of foreign election interference, called speculation that he or his deputy penned the op-ed ‘patently false.’” Also denying authorship are HUD Secretary Carson, Interior’s Zinke, Labor’s Acosta, Energy’s Perry, EPA’s Wheeler, Kellyanne Conway, Commerce’s Ross, CIA Director Haspel, VA chief Wilkie, OMB head Mulvaney, US Amb. Jon Huntsman, USDA’s Perdue, ED’s DeVos and HHS Secretary Azar. Politico <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018090701biden&r=email-01f2&l=034-249&t=c> (9/6, Oprysko) mentions, meanwhile, that FCC chairman Pai, FTC head Simons, USTR Lighthizer and Transportation’s Chao also denied authorship of the op-ed. The Los Angeles Times <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018090701biden&r=email-01f2&l=035-ed0&t=c> (9/6, Bierman) notes that traveling in India, Pompeo told reporters, “It’s not mine. ... It is sad that you have someone who would make that choice. ... I come from a place where if you’re not in a position to execute the commander’s intent, you have a singular option, that is to leave.” Pompeo “blamed the publication of the op-ed on media that he said are trying to undermine Trump, a phenomenon he called ‘incredibly disturbing.’” Reuters <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018090701biden&r=email-01f2&l=036-c2f&t=c> (9/6, Heavey, Brice) indicates Haley also “told reporters she was not the author.” The Washington Post <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018090701biden&r=email-01f2&l=037-0b2&t=c> (9/6, Wagner) notes the “parade of denials...amid frenzied speculation” but does not mention any additional officials, and neither do the New York Times <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018090701biden&r=email-01f2&l=038-6b6&t=c> (9/6, Sullivan), Wall Street Journal <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018090701biden&r=email-01f2&l=039-4c3&t=c> (9/6, A1, Bender), Daily Caller <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018090701biden&r=email-01f2&l=03a-f4c&t=c> (9/6, Enjet) or Washington Times <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018090701biden&r=email-01f2&l=03b-ac3&t=c> (9/6, Boyer, Muñoz), among other news outlets. Reuters <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018090701biden&r=email-01f2&l=03c-d11&t=c> (9/6, Cherelus) reports that according to Predictit.org <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018090701biden&r=email-01f2&l=03d-d52&t=c>, “an online market for betting on political events,” Coats “was seen as having an 18 percent chance of being the writer,” with Pence “listed in second place with a 12 percent chance” and Nielsen “third with 10 percent.” The Washington Times <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018090701biden&r=email-01f2&l=03e-043&t=c> (9/6, Boyer) reports, meanwhile, that “the conservative group Americans for Limited Government called on the White House to administer lie-detector tests to find the person.” *CBS: Speculation Focused On “Deeply Disgruntled” Member Of “Diplomatic Or National Security Team.” *On CBS This Morning[image: Image removed by sender. Video] <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018090701biden&r=email-01f2&l=03f-aa7&t=c> (9/6), Major Garrett reported that speculation “has focused on a deeply disgruntled member of the President’s diplomatic or national security team.” Garrett went on to report that he is “very skeptical” of the anonymous author’s claim that some in the Administration have discussed “invoking the 25th Amendment and using that dimension of the Constitution to deal with an impaired President incapable of doing his job.” Garrett said, “I have never came across that in all of my reporting.” Jennifer Rubin writes in the Washington Post <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018090701biden&r=email-01f2&l=040-9dc&t=c> (9/6), “I do not believe that the unnamed New York Times op-ed writer...is Cabinet-rank.” It “makes more sense that the writer is a level or two down the food chain from a Cabinet secretary. These are the sort of people who may attend the deputies meetings of the National Security Council (e.g., deputy secretaries of treasury, defense, state). They aren’t household names; they don’t generally get book deals or make the front page of papers when they are fired or quit.” The New York Times <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018090701biden&r=email-01f2&l=041-e3a&t=c> (9/6, Flegenheimer) asks, “What is a senior administration official? Who counts? Certainly cabinet secretaries would qualify, and top aides in the White House, like the chief of staff.” However, “veterans of Washington recognized that the list was potentially far broader, and murkier,” as “generally, sourcing descriptions are a matter of negotiation between a journalist and a source.” The Times adds that “at the very least, according to the working definition used by many journalists and sources, the universe of possible senior administration officials probably numbers in the hundreds, at a minimum – deputies, under secretaries, special assistants.” The Washington Times <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018090701biden&r=email-01f2&l=042-946&t=c> (9/6, Boyer) also indicates “the title of ‘senior’ administration official could apply to hundreds of government personnel,” and USA Today <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018090701biden&r=email-01f2&l=043-dad&t=c> (9/6, Snider) reports that Rem Rieder, “a former USA Today media columnist who now teaches media ethics at Widener University” in Chester, Pennsylvania, said “eventually the public will learn who the wrote the op-ed,” and “the credibility of the paper will really be hurt if it turns out it’s not really somebody at or close to the top.” *Sanders: Those Wanting To Know Identity Of “Anonymous Coward” Should Call “Failing” NYTimes. *The Washington Examiner <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018090701biden&r=email-01f2&l=044-ff8&t=c> (9/6, Donachie) reports that Sanders “said Thursday that if people want to know who wrote the anonymous New York Times op-ed, they should call the paper’s opinion desk because they were ‘complicit in this deceitful act.’” Said Sanders, “The media’s wild obsession with the identity of the anonymous coward is recklessly tarnishing the reputation of thousands of great Americans who proudly serve our country and work for President Trump. Stop. ... If you want to know who this gutless loser is, call the opinion desk of the failing NYT at 212-556-1234, and ask them. They are the only ones complicit in this deceitful act. We stand united together and fully support our President.” Townhall <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018090701biden&r=email-01f2&l=045-97e&t=c> (9/6, Pavlich) notes Sanders also said, “President Trump has laid out a bold and ambitious agenda. Every day since taking office, he has fulfilled the promises he made. His accomplishments in less than two years have been astounding. ... The individual behind this piece has chosen to deceive, rather than support, the duly elected President of the United States. He is not putting country first, but putting himself and his ego ahead of the will of the American people. This coward should do the right thing and resign.” *Another “Senior Official” Says “Dozens And Dozens” Within Working To Thwart Trump. *Jonathan Swan and Mike Allen of Axios <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018090701biden&r=email-01f2&l=046-561&t=c> (9/6) say Trump “should be paranoid,” because “in the hours after the New York Times published the anonymous” op-ed purportedly written by a senior official in the Trump Administration, “two senior administration officials reached out to Axios to say the author stole the words right out of their mouths.” One “senior official” is quoted as saying. “I find the reaction to the NYT op-ed fascinating – that people seem so shocked that there is a resistance from the inside. A lot of us [were] wishing we’d been the writer, I suspect. ... I hope he [Trump] knows – maybe he does? – that there are dozens and dozens of us.” Swan and Allen add, “A good number of current White House officials have privately admitted to us they consider Trump unstable, and at times dangerously slow.” *Editor Of Book On Trump’s Mental Health Says White House Aides Reached Out To Him. *The New York Daily News <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018090701biden&r=email-01f2&l=047-f6b&t=c> (9/6, Slattery) reports, “White House officials reached out to a noted Yale University psychiatrist last fall out of concern over...Trump’s increasingly erratic behavior.” Dr. Bandy Lee, “who edited the best-selling book ‘The Dangerous Case of Donald Trump: 27 Psychiatrists and Mental Health Experts Assess a President,’ told the Daily News Thursday the staffers contacted her because the President was ‘scaring’ them.” Said Lee, “I had not mentioned this before because I did not want to confuse my role as an educator to the public.” According to Lee, “around the same time, a Trump family friend emailed her over concern for his mental health.” *Warren Urges Administration To Invoke 25th Amendment, Fundraises On Her Call. *The Washington Times <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018090701biden&r=email-01f2&l=048-4da&t=c> (9/6, Morton) reports that Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-MA) “called on White House officials Thursday to remove...Trump from office as unfit to handle the job.” Warren told CNN[image: Image removed by sender. Video] <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018090701biden&r=email-01f2&l=049-2e4&t=c>, “If senior administration officials think the President of the United States is not able to do his job, then they should invoke the 25th Amendment.” The Times adds that “shortly after the CNN interview, Ms. Warren sent out a fundraising letter, making the same case for removing Mr. Trump.” The New York Times <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018090701biden&r=email-01f2&l=04a-051&t=c> (9/6, Shear) reports on the history of the 25th Amendment and how it operates. “The 25th Amendment to the Constitution is primarily designed to clarify the presidential order of succession” and was proposed after John F. Kennedy’s assassination. Of particular current interest is Section Four, while “provides a multistep process for the vice president and a majority of the officials who lead executive agencies – commonly thought of as the cabinet – to declare that the president is ‘unable to discharge the powers and duties of his office,’” which would lead to a vote in Congress and, should two-thirds of members of both the House and the Senate must agree the president is unable to continue performing his duties, the president is stripped of his position. *Boot, Gerson, Ignatius, USA Today, Beschloss, Brownstein Among Those Defending Rogue Aides. *Trump critic Max Boot writes in the Washington Post <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018090701biden&r=email-01f2&l=04b-1a2&t=c> (9/6) that both Trump’s supporters and critics “agreed...that the author, who has been dubbed Deep State Throat, is a coward.” Boot adds, “The Times op-ed writer apparently is trying to have it both ways by speaking out publicly while still trying to stymie the president in private. Perhaps that’s not a tenable approach, but I am willing to cut some slack to anyone in a position of power who is working to save America from the most reckless, corrupt and unqualified president in our history.” David Ignatius writes, also in the Washington Post <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018090701biden&r=email-01f2&l=04c-783&t=c> (9/6), that “Trump called the leaker ‘gutless,’” but “the charge really applies to members of Congress, administration officials and, yes, even voters who see that something is disastrously wrong and do nothing to stop it – protecting party or personal interests rather than the nation.” Under the headline “We Are A Superpower Run By A Simpleton,” Michael Gerson writes in his Washington Post <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018090701biden&r=email-01f2&l=04d-d44&t=c> (9/6) column that “the manipulation of the president in a good cause works,” and “those who engage in this task boldly and consistently are both losing their reputation and serving their country.” USA Today <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018090701biden&r=email-01f2&l=04e-242&t=c> (9/6) editorializes that “the mounting evidence, from people inside the White House itself, that Captain Trump may be erratically steering the nation toward an iceberg is both clarifying and somewhat terrifying. ... How and when the Trump administration ends is unknowable at this point. But its current course is looking increasingly unsustainable.” NBC Nightly News[image: Image removed by sender. Video] <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018090701biden&r=email-01f2&l=04f-7dc&t=c> (9/6, story 3, 1:50, Jackson) showed presidential historian Michael Beschloss saying, “If you’ve got a number of people at a high level all agreeing that Donald Trump is not fit to be President and is in fact, dangerous, that’s something we’ve never seen before.” Political analyst Ron Brownstein said on CNN’s The Lead[image: Image removed by sender. Video] <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018090701biden&r=email-01f2&l=050-647&t=c> (9/6), “In essence, what congressional Republicans have been saying for the last 20 months and what now in the Woodward book and people in the Administration are saying is ‘Yes, we agree, in private, that the President by temperament, judgment, intellect is not fit for this job. But because he is the key to the lock, he won the White House, he is the one who gives us the power to achieve what we want on other fronts. ... If, in fact, all of these Republicans believe that he is unfit, are they unwilling to do anything about it because...he is the one who won and, because he won, they are getting what they want.” *NYTimes Editorial: Trump’s Responses Confirm Allegations Of Off-The-Rails Presidency. *A New York Times <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018090701biden&r=email-01f2&l=051-b8d&t=c> (9/6) editorial says “Trump has never handled criticism well, but this past week has proved especially challenging.” First came “a scathing account” of Trump in a new book by Bob Woodward, and a day later, an op-ed in this newspaper, by an anonymous senior Administration official “recounted how members of Mr. Trump’s team have worked to protect the nation from his ‘worst inclinations.’” Trump, the Times says, “quickly corroborated these accounts by demonstrating precisely the sort of erratic, antidemocratic behavior that is driving administration officials to come forward with their concerns.” *Swalwell, Hirono Slam “Rogue” Aides As Well As Trump. *Rep. Eric Swalwell (D-CA) said on Fox News’ Tucker Carlson Tonight[image: Image removed by sender. Video] <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018090701biden&r=email-01f2&l=052-2ef&t=c> (9/6), “The fact that these aides are going rogue, and I do not think they are patriotic at all, I lay that blame squarely at the feet of Congress. That is a Congress that has not checked the President, and we are in a position where we have a new branch of government, these aides, who think that they get to decide what is right or wrong and they prevent the President from doing what he wants to do and that prevents democracy from working in truly understanding what the intent and directions are on the President.” Sen. Mazie Hirono (D-HI) said on CNN’s Situation Room[image: Image removed by sender. Video] <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018090701biden&r=email-01f2&l=053-12f&t=c> (9/6), “The fact that there are a group of them trying to save this country from the worst of the Trump impulses, it makes me wonder how bad could it be. Because even overt things such as the 1.5 trillion tax breaks to the richest people in our country, separating children from their parents at the border, undoing environmental laws, those kinds of things are bad enough. So I would want these people to come forward, because they are not accountable to anybody. They’re not voted in. Why don’t they come forward and tell us what’s going on in the White House? We do know it’s chaotic.” He added, “They’re picking and choosing what things they want to protect us from, the President’s worst instincts. I shudder to think what else could be coming down the pike.” *USA Today: As Controversy Swirls, Americans “Start Off Every Day In A Bad Mood.” *Under the headline “‘I Start Off Every Day In A Bad Mood’: How Americans Grapple With Daily Drama Of Trump White House,” USA Today <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018090701biden&r=email-01f2&l=054-679&t=c> (9/6, Gomez, Collins) reports “the chaos and rancor depicted inside the White House in the op-ed piece and a new book by veteran journalist Bob Woodward is reverberating not only in Washington, but all across the country – in places like Miami Beach; Denver; Freemont, Ohio and Murfreesboro, Tenn.” USA Today goes on to interview voters who say “they are finding it hard to escape the daily drama coming out of the White House.” USA Today also reports that “though it’s too early to gauge the toll from the latest stream of bad news, the stakes for Trump are huge,” as “all of this comes at a time when Trump appears to be losing ground with voters.” The voters interviewed for the story, at any rate, fall along party lines. Foreign Policy Trump Welcomes Kim Saying He Wants Denuclearization In Trump’s First Term. ABC World News Tonight[image: Image removed by sender. Video] <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018090701biden&r=email-01f2&l=055-894&t=c> (9/6, story 5, 1:10, Muir) reported, “Kim Jong-un, now saying he’s committed to denuclearization by the end of the President’s first term.” Kim met with South Korean officials in Pyongyang, “reportedly telling them he has never made a negative comment about the President.” The South Koreans “also say that Kim told them he wants to denuclearize before the end of Trump’s first term. But David, the North Koreans and the US may have very different definitions of what denuclearization actually means.” NBC Nightly News[image: Image removed by sender. Video] <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018090701biden&r=email-01f2&l=056-7d1&t=c> (9/6, story 5, 1:40, Holt) reported that President Trump responded by “praising Kim Jong-un’s diplomacy, tweeting, ‘Kim Jong Un of North Korea proclaims unwavering faith in President Trump. Thank you Kim, we’ll get it done together.’” However, “Despite the President declaring there is no longer a nuclear threat from North Korea,” there is “no progress on US nuclear demands, and now NBC News is reporting China is cheating on sanctions, jump starting trade with North Korea.” The Washington Times <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018090701biden&r=email-01f2&l=057-b4e&t=c> (9/6, Muñoz) reports Trump “thanked North Korea on Thursday after a timeline to complete denuclearization in just a few years was reportedly set.” South Korean National Security Adviser Chung Eui-yong said Kim “has ‘unchanged’ faith in Mr. Trump,” and the North Koreans “want to denuclearize by the end of Mr. Trump’s first term in January 2021.” Trump “thanked the North Korean dictator on Twitter Thursday morning, writing, ‘We will get it done together!’” Reuters <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018090701biden&r=email-01f2&l=058-091&t=c> (9/6, Heavey) reports Trump “welcomed Kim Jong Un’s remarks saying his faith in Trump was unchanged as the North Korean leader and that Pyongyang aimed to achieve denuclearization within Trump’s first term in office.” Trump tweeted <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018090701biden&r=email-01f2&l=059-3ae&t=c>, “Kim Jong Un of North Korea proclaims ‘unwavering faith in President Trump.’ Thank you to Chairman Kim. We will get it done together!” The Washington Post <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018090701biden&r=email-01f2&l=05a-dfe&t=c> (9/6, Denyer) reports Kim “told a team of South Korean envoys that he continues to trust President Trump and said he hoped to achieve the denuclearization of the Korean Peninsula while Trump is in office, the chief envoy said Thursday.” Trump “responded on Twitter by expressing his appreciation,” but there was “also was a reminder of the current impasse in negotiations.” North Korean media “repeated the country’s demand that the United States make the next move by formally declaring an end to the Korean War, which concluded in 1953 with an armistice but not a peace treaty.” The New York Times <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018090701biden&r=email-01f2&l=05b-2f0&t=c> (9/6, Choe) reports Kim expressed “frustration over what he called Washington’s failure to negotiate in good faith,” but he told Chung “that he still had confidence in Mr. Trump. He said he had never spoken badly of the American leader, even to his closest aides, since the two met in Singapore on June 12, according to Mr. Chung.” Chung also said Kim “gave him messages to relay to Washington, which officials said were being sent to his American counterpart, John Bolton, Mr. Trump’s national security adviser.” To the AP <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018090701biden&r=email-01f2&l=05c-9d9&t=c> (9/6, Kim, Tong-Hyung, Klug), the “trove of comments from Kim...will be parsed for clues about Kim’s mindset.” Politico <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018090701biden&r=email-01f2&l=05d-5d8&t=c> (9/6, Oprysko) reports, “Kim’s praise for Trump was conveyed through a South Korean delegation” and South Korean special envoy Chung Eun-yong said that Kim said he is “willing to take more active measures toward denuclearization if his advance steps could be met with matching measures.” Reuters <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018090701biden&r=email-01f2&l=05e-a10&t=c> (9/6, Shin, Heavey) reports Chung said Kim and South Korean President Moon Jae-in “will meet in Pyongyang on Sept. 18-20 for a third summit and discuss ‘practical measures’ toward denuclearization.” Brian Todd reported on CNN’s Situation Room[image: Image removed by sender. Video] <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018090701biden&r=email-01f2&l=05f-616&t=c> (9/6) that Kim’s reported comments to the South Koreans “brought a glowing response from Trump,” but “denuclearization talks may fall apart,” and “many are concerned that Kim could be exploiting” Trump. Bret Baier reported on Fox News’ Special Report[image: Image removed by sender. Video] <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018090701biden&r=email-01f2&l=060-b58&t=c> (9/6) that while Kim informed the South of “his desire for a nuclear free Korean peninsula,” North Korea’s state newspaper “says Washington must discard its stubborn stance that the North must denuclearize before the US agrees to a peace treaty.” The Washington Times <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018090701biden&r=email-01f2&l=061-e44&t=c> (9/6, Taylor) reports that while critics say that “Trump’s ongoing nuclear negotiations with North Korea...are going nowhere fast,” yet “some key officials and analysts in South Korea and in Washington argue that they can see major policy shifts,” and that “Kim’s desire to secure his own legitimacy” is driving him towards “a totally uncharacteristic openness to diplomacy with Washington and Seoul.” *New US Special Envoy To Visit Asia. *The AP <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018090701biden&r=email-01f2&l=062-9ac&t=c> (9/6, Lee) reports newly appointed US special envoy for North Korea Stephen Biegun will “make his first diplomatic trip abroad next week in the Trump administration’s latest effort to press for progress in uncertain denuclearization talks.” The State Department announced Thursday that Biegun will “visit South Korea, China and Japan between Sept. 10 and Sept. 15.” In a statement, the Department said Biegun “will meet with his counterparts and continue diplomatic efforts to achieve the final, fully verified denuclearization of North Korea as agreed to by Chairman Kim in Singapore.” The Wall Street Journal <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018090701biden&r=email-01f2&l=063-753&t=c> (9/6, McBride) reports Biegun’s trip follows the cancellation of a planned visit to North Korea by the envoy and Secretary of State Pompeo. *US Charges North Korean For Cyberattacks. *ABC World News Tonight[image: Image removed by sender. Video] <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018090701biden&r=email-01f2&l=064-4de&t=c> (9/6, story 5, 1:10, Muir) briefly reported that the Justice Department is “taking action against a North Korean figure backed by that government for hacking.” NBC Nightly News[image: Image removed by sender. Video] <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018090701biden&r=email-01f2&l=065-3a0&t=c> (9/6, story 5, 1:40, Holt) reported, “Today, US authorities charging the North Korean spy they say is responsible not only for hacking Sony pictures in 2014, but for other attacks, costing hundreds of millions of dollars in damage around the world.” One “worldwide attack” took down computers in 150 countries. Catherine Herridge added on Fox News’ Special Report[image: Image removed by sender. Video] <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018090701biden&r=email-01f2&l=066-03b&t=c> (9/6) that officials on Thursday “said...there was no communication with North Korea in advance” of the announced charges. Officials “add[ed] the charges were not held to avoid disrupting the June nuclear talks in Singapore” between Trump and Kim. The Washington Post <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018090701biden&r=email-01f2&l=067-7ce&t=c> (9/6, Nakashima, Morello, Barrett) reports the Justice Department announced “computer hacking charges Thursday against an alleged spy for the North Korean government in connection with the 2014 cyberattack on Sony Pictures Entertainment, marking the first time the United States has brought such charges against a Pyongyang operative.” US officials accused Park Jin Hyok “of hacking on behalf of North Korea’s Reconnaissance General Bureau (RGB), the military intelligence agency that controls most of the country’s cyber-capabilities.” The complaint “outlines a series of malicious cyber-operations,” linking Park to “the Lazarus Group, which also has been implicated in the audacious attempt to steal $1 billion from the Bangladesh Bank in 2016, and to the WannaCry virus that affected more than 230,000 computers in 150 countries last year.” The New York Times <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018090701biden&r=email-01f2&l=068-32a&t=c> (9/6, Sanger, Benner, Goldman) reports the Justice Department accused the North of “orchestrating a broad conspiracy that caused hundreds of millions of dollars’ worth of economic damage over the past five years in the United States and around the world.” Park was “charged with computer fraud and wire fraud. He was part of attacks on film companies and distributors, including Sony Pictures, financial institutions and defense contractors, law enforcement officials said.” Park was also accused of “being part of the development of the WannaCry 2.0 ransomware attack that infected hundreds of thousands of computers worldwide and crippled the British health care system last year.” USA Today <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018090701biden&r=email-01f2&l=069-278&t=c> (9/6, Shesgreen) reports the Trump Administration “concluded last year that North Korea was responsible, but then-Homeland Security Adviser Thomas Bossert suggested the U.S. had little recourse in the case.” The AFP <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018090701biden&r=email-01f2&l=06a-c50&t=c> (9/6) reports the US “charged a North Korean programmer Thursday with some of the most dramatic global hacking cases of recent years, alleging they were carried out on behalf of the regime in Pyongyang.” The Treasury Department “announced financial sanctions on Park and a government-controlled company he worked for, Chosun Expo Joint Venture.” Reuters <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018090701biden&r=email-01f2&l=06b-f64&t=c> (9/6, Wroughton) reports the Treasury Department “accused Pak Jin Kyok and the Chosun Expo Joint Venture company of involvement in malign cyber activities and said they were linked to the North Korean government.” The Department said they “engaged in significant activities undermining cybersecurity through the use of computer networks or systems against targets outside of North Korea on behalf of the Government of North Korea or the Workers’ Party of Korea.” *Red Cross Says At Least 76 Dead In North Korea Flooding. *Reuters <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018090701biden&r=email-01f2&l=06c-e7f&t=c> (9/6, Nebehay) reports the International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies said “severe flooding in North Korea has killed at least 76 people with nearly the same number missing and thousands left homeless by the destruction.” Red Cross volunteers are “conducting search and rescue operations in North and South Hwanghae provinces, where heavy rains began on August 28, it said, adding that many children were among the 75 missing.” *North Korea To Hold “Mass Games” To Celebrate 70th Anniversary. * Reuters <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018090701biden&r=email-01f2&l=06d-a8d&t=c> (9/6, Smith) reports that for the “first time in five years, North Korea is expected to put on a massive performance on Sunday known as the ‘Mass Games.’” This year’s performances come as Kim “seeks to rebrand North Korea as a responsible nuclear-armed state more focused on developing its economy than rattling proverbial sabres.” The Mass Games will “be one of several high profile events, including a military parade, to mark the 70th anniversary of the founding of North Korea.” Trump Says UNWRA Cuts Are Bargaining Chip In Middle East Peace Talks. Bret Baier reported on Fox News’ Special Report[image: Image removed by sender. Video] <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018090701biden&r=email-01f2&l=06e-92e&t=c> (9/6) that the Israeli military says it has shut down the main personnel crossing into Gaza “after hundreds of Palestinian rioters hurled rocks and damaged the terminal.” The move comes as Palestinians “face the prospect of much less US aid in the near future.” after the Trump Administration’s decision last month to cut $300 million from the UN relief agency UNWRA. Fox’s Trey Yingst said Palestinians Fox spoke to on Thursday “believe the assistance of the Trump Administration to the United Nations is a right given to them under international law” – something the Trump Administration “disputes.” President Trump on Thursday “admitted” during a call with American Jewish leaders “that he is using the cuts as a bargaining chip in order to bring back the Palestinians to the American-led peace negotiations.” Axios <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018090701biden&r=email-01f2&l=06f-971&t=c> (9/6, Ravid) reports, “In a conference call with Jewish leaders Thursday,” Trump said he had asked previous negotiators, “‘Did you ever do that before? Did you ever use the money angle?’ They said, ‘No, sir. We thought it would be disrespectful.’ I said, ‘I don’t think it’s disrespectful at all. I think it’s disrespectful when people don’t come to the table.’” US, UK, France, Germany, Canada Unite In Response To Russian Nerve Agent Attack. Reuters <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018090701biden&r=email-01f2&l=070-280&t=c> (9/6) reports that on Thursday, the governments of Britain, France, Germany, Canada and the United States “pledged...to work to disrupt ‘the hostile activities of foreign intelligence networks’ and called on Russia to disclose its nerve agent program.” Reuters says that in a joint statement, “the other four countries said they backed Britain’s assessment that Russian officers were behind an attack in March on a former Russian spy and his daughter in the English city of Salisbury using nerve agent Novichok. Britain charged two Russians in absentia on Wednesday with attempted murder.” The Washington Post <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018090701biden&r=email-01f2&l=071-76f&t=c> (9/6, Adam) reports that the joint statement “was released shortly before London’s and Moscow’s envoys to the United Nations squared off at the Security Council in an emergency meeting called by Britain to brief diplomats on the investigation.” The Post says British Ambassador Karen Pierce “methodically outlined evidence that she said pointed to the Kremlin’s complicity in the attack.” According to the Post, Russian Ambassador Vassily Nebenzia “unleashed scorn as he denied any Russian involvement in the case, which he ridiculed as ‘an unfounded and mendacious cocktail of facts.’” The AP <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018090701biden&r=email-01f2&l=072-47c&t=c> (9/6, Vasilyeva, Lawless) reports that the Kremlin also “rejected accusations by British authorities that Russian President Vladimir Putin is ultimately responsible for [the] poisoning...and said Russia is not going to investigate the suspects.” Putin’s spokesman, Dmitry Peskov, said, “Neither the Russian leadership nor its representatives have anything to do with the events in Salisbury.” *US Planes Intercepted Russian Bombers Near Alaska Saturday. *The Washington Free Beacon <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018090701biden&r=email-01f2&l=073-184&t=c> (9/6, Gertz) reports according to the North American Aerospace Defense Command, “two Russian nuclear-capable bombers were intercepted by American F-22 jets near Alaska on Saturday.” Spokesman Michael Kucharek said, “Two Alaskan-based NORAD F-22 fighters intercepted and visually identified two Tu-95 ‘Bear’ long-range bomber aircraft flying in the Alaskan Air Defense Identification Zone, south of the Aleutian Islands.” He added that the “aircraft were intercepted and monitored by the F-22s until the bombers left the ADIZ along the Aleutian Island chain heading west.” Kucharek concluded, “At no time did the Russian bombers enter Canadian or United States sovereign airspace.” *Resolution Would Ask Trump To Support Renaming NATO HQ For McCain. *The Washington Post <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018090701biden&r=email-01f2&l=074-a62&t=c> (9/6, Sonmez) reports a bipartisan group of Members of Congress have backed legislation to ask “the President to support renaming NATO headquarters” for the late Sen. John McCain. The Post says the proposal “is likely to spark the ire of President Trump.” The measure was introduced by Sens. Ben Cardin (D-DE) and Marco Rubio (R-FL), and by Reps. Mike Gallagher (R-WI) and Jimmy Panetta (D-CA). They were backed by another “group of 20 other lawmakers – nine Republicans and 11 Democrats – from both chambers.” US Official: Trump “Not In A Hurry” To Withdraw From Syria. The Washington Post <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018090701biden&r=email-01f2&l=075-f13&t=c> (9/6, Deyoung) reports President Trump, “who just five months ago said he wanted ‘to get out’ of Syria and bring US troops home soon, has agreed to a new strategy that indefinitely extends the military effort there and launches a major diplomatic push to achieve American objectives, according to senior State Department officials.” With ISIS nearly defeated, the Administration has “redefined its goals to include the exit of all Iranian military and proxy forces from Syria, and est
METADATA:
THREAD:
INDEX:
AQFAgTumDaI/EHHj9zQ4ATYYe4l0I6YMU/9Q
REFERENCES:
REPLY_TO:
<0.0.0.9.1D446A0A92DB548.0@colo032.bulletinnews.com>
REFS:
<0.0.0.9.1D446A0A92DB548.0@colo032.bulletinnews.com>