EMAIL DETAILS
SUBJECT:
Fw: Asia Times, May 16, 2012
PRI: NORMAL
FROM:
F
fariborzsfatemi@yahoo.com
DATE:
2012-05-24 08:20:54
MSG_ID:
<1337847654.11839.YahooMailClassic@web184515.mail.ne1.yahoo.com>
RECIPIENTS:
TO:
F
fariborz fatemi
<fariborzsfatemi@yahoo.com>
CONTENT:
TEXT: YES |
HTML: YES
PROCESSED
ASIA TIMES May 16, 2012 [Re Middle East calm in the eye of a storm, May 16, 2012] There has been much uninformed explanation and speculation by self-proclaimed experts and commentators as to why Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu decided to forgo a new election and form a workable coalition government. Israel's real threat has always been a binational state. Either a two-state solution, where Palestinians and Israelis live side by side in security and peace. Or, a binational state where eventually Israel loses its Jewish character and majority. Since he became prime minister, Netanyahu has had that choice. Pursue a peace with the Palestinians or change the subject. The prime minister's record on pursuing peace had been dismal at best. When he was prime minister last, his government was known for its self-promotion and was under a cloud of corruption charges. His record had been against a two-state solution and he had to be dragged kicking and screaming in saying those words as prime minister now. So far, he has changed the subject by demonizing and threatening Iran and making it his "messianic mission". The prime minister was cheered on by his neo-con supporters and the Israel-can-do-no-wrong crowd in the US Congress and the media. Sensing the danger of these policies to Israel, its military and intelligence service members decided to speak out forcefully. Their job has always been to protect the people of Israel, whereas the prime minister, whenever in office, had seemed to be working to protect himself politically. Thomas Pardo, head of Israeli Mossad intelligence agency, said Iran "is not an existential threat." In fact, Army Chief Benny Gantz has described the Iranian leadership as very rational and the former chief of the Mossad Meir Dagan has said that it would be "stupid" to attack Iran. Finally, former Israeli internal security chief Yuval Diskin confirmed the fact that all the saber rattling about Iran was because the Israeli government "has no interest in solving anything with the Palestinians ... ". Now that the prime minister has formed a coalition with Kadima, it will be interesting to see if he changes his tune. The head of Kadima and a new vice prime minister, Shaul Mofaz, is on record having said "the threat that Israel will become a bi-national state is far more serious than the Iranian nuclear issue." The question now is, in order to prevent the real threat to peace and stability in the Middle East, is the prime minister willing to bring about a settlement with the Palestinians? Fariborz S Fatemi McLean, VA.
METADATA:
THREAD:
INDEX:
AdhhoNpNdGUIaSDyQXuCsIC2zE1lNA==