EMAIL DETAILS
SUBJECT:
FW: PolyMet
PRI: NORMAL
FROM:
J
jpeugh@rosemontseneca.com
DATE:
2010-07-14 16:17:55
MSG_ID:
<635170e91030df86075da70f62002d32@mail.gmail.com>
RECIPIENTS:
TO:
H
Hunter Biden
<hbiden@rosemontseneca.com>
CONTENT:
TEXT: YES |
HTML: YES
PROCESSED
*From:* Joan Peugh [mailto:jpeugh@rosemontseneca.com] *Sent:* Monday, July 12, 2010 10:13 AM *To:* Hunter Biden *Subject:* RE: PolyMet And an attachment might help *From:* Hunter Biden [mailto:hbiden@rosemontseneca.com] *Sent:* Friday, July 09, 2010 12:53 PM *To:* Joan Peugh *Subject:* Re: PolyMet What's the general attitude of the Administration to these types of projects. Have any other similar projects been approved. Has Polymet been singled out or is there a move to stop all similar new mining projects like this? Sent from my iPad On Jul 9, 2010, at 12:05 PM, Joan Peugh <jpeugh@rosemontseneca.com> wrote: I put together some stuff I found while researching summarizing what is going on and what may happen next…let me know if you need more specific or to clarify *Joan K. Peugh* *Rosemont Seneca Partners* 1010 Wisconsin Avenue, NW Suite 705 Washington, DC 20007 T:(202) 333-1880 F: (202 333-1886 M: (202) 841-8543 jpeugh@rosemontseneca.com <PolyMet Mining.docx
METADATA:
THREAD:
INDEX:
AcsfhtRqlMvYnjWMRQ6DEuTbSeaF2ACRYDmQAGjxlWA=