EMAIL DETAILS

That makes sense to me, and I lean toward delivering the last point in person.

I'll make the changes in the morning so if there is any other changes please let me know.

________________________________
From: Eric Schwerin <eschwerin@rosemontseneca.com>
To: Nell McGarity
Cc: hbiden@rosemontseneca.com <hbiden@rosemontseneca.com>; Alex Slater; Hilary Rosen
Sent: Mon Oct 18 17:50:34 2010
Subject: Re: Memo for tomorrow's meeting

Only two comments, Hunter and I have on this. We should clarify on number 4, so the impression isn't that "we", i.e. Rosemont Seneca or SKDK are going to follow up with Congressional offices (unless you guys think you can). Maybe change it to "CAF USA should follow up with Congressional offices........" Brings up the question of whether they are capable of doing it alone or need Squire Sanders to do it )or someone else, but probably don't want the misinterpretation that we'll do it and better to leave it unspecified.

Finally, perhaps a number 5 or just a concluding line is appropriate just saying that if you are not prepared to do the above, you should let sleeping dogs lie, play up the last two lines of the FTA letter and pursue your legal rights in TX. May be something we just say orally to them in person, but you get the gist.


Eric D. Schwerin
Rosemont Seneca Partners, LLC
1010 Wisconsin Ave., NW
Suite 705
Washington, DC 20007
(202) 333-1880
eschwerin@rosemontseneca.com<x-msg://59/eschwerin@obblaw.com>
P Consider the environment before printing this email.

On Oct 18, 2010, at 4:51 PM, Nell McGarity wrote:

Attached is a memo from both of us (with your approval of course) that lays out what the next steps should be with DOT. It is based off last Thursday’s call and the list that Eric draft. Please let me know if you have any additional edits. I will bring copies to the meeting tomorrow.


<10.19.10 Memo on DOT.docx>