Re: 10am Deliverables Call Tomorrow

SUBJECT:

PRI: NORMAL

FROM:

E

eschwerin@rosemontseneca.com

DATE:

2010-11-04 02:09:29

MSG_ID:

<F4548338-C3B0-468D-80ED-57D57890CE38@rosemontseneca.com>

RECIPIENTS:

TO:

H

Hunter Biden <hbiden@rosemontseneca.com>

CC:

D

Devon Archer <darcher@rosemontseneca.com>

CONTENT: TEXT: YES | HTML: YES

PROCESSED

No need to call people out. It's not like I am keeping attendance or anything.....

Eric D. Schwerin
eschwerin@rosemontseneca.com

Sent from my iPhone

On Nov 3, 2010, at 7:43 PM, Hunter Biden <hbiden@rosemontseneca.com> wrote:

> I don't think if I've missed any so I assume you are talking to Devon-- whim we all know is a total slacker.
>
> R. Hunter Biden
> 202-333-1880
>
>
> On Nov 3, 2010, at 5:41 PM, Eric Schwerin <eschwerin@rosemontseneca.com> wrote:
>
>> I keep forgetting to talk to you guys about this - I am concerned that our weekly delivery calls and pipeline calls are getting stale and people aren't making it a priority to call in. I certainly think once we get an official incentive system in place that will change, but in the meantime attendance is sporadic and I am not sure they are entirely effective. I don't think all three of us need to be on them all the time, but at least a critical mass of 2 out of 3 of us will probably encourage others to be on it more. Thoughts?
>>
>>
>>
>> Eric D. Schwerin
>> Rosemont Seneca Partners, LLC
>> 1010 Wisconsin Ave., NW
>> Suite 705
>> Washington, DC 20007
>> (202) 333-1880
>> eschwerin@rosemontseneca.com
>> P Consider the environment before printing this email.
>>=2

METADATA:

THREAD:

INDEX: AdhhotomLbQMHixLRb6k9HB55SrdIw==

REFERENCES:

REPLY_TO:

<DDEA00C7-2D03-4EAF-BD72-D0E099709194@rosemontseneca.com>

REFS:

<1CFBFD12-8349-4888-89D2-9D5D3CADB6C5@rosemontseneca.com>

<DDEA00C7-2D03-4EAF-BD72-D0E099709194@rosemontseneca.com>

EMAIL DETAILS