EMAIL DETAILS

Hunter,

Just wanted to follow up on this. I understand the first choice of the US will be Susana Malcora, who is the FM of Argentina. We knew Vuk would never be the US first choice; but of course China/Russia will want to deny the US its first choice and the same in the reverse.

But WH doesn’t seem to want to see Vuk and we are getting only low level meetings at State.

J

From: Jared Genser <jgenser@perseus-strategies.com<mailto:jgenser@perseus-strategies.com>>
Date: Tuesday, May 3, 2016 at 11:27 PM
To: Hunter Biden <hbiden@rosemontseneca.com<mailto:hbiden@rosemontseneca.com>>
Subject: Our Friend

Hunter,

FYI, here is his platform. Amazingly, Vuk was the only one of the nine candidates at the UNGA interviews to make public a platform with their ideas — his is some 80+ pages with 53 specific commitments — worth a quick look at pp. 16-21, which is a list of the 53 commitments, which as you’ll see are consistent with many things the Administration cares about.

I’ve been in touch with Tony at State and as of now Vuk is meeting at lower levels with the head of UN engagement in the International Organizations Bureau. But you'll see below the exchange that I had with Steve Pomper at the NSC, which isn’t exactly encouraging.

It isn’t clear to me if the stiff arm is a result of the fact that the WH/State aren’t yet focused on this election given the straw poll within the Security Council doesn’t take place until the end of June and election in October, or if this is focused on Vuk. I have some friends in the NSC and believe they aren’t really meeting with candidates yet.

But Vuk has had much higher level meetings with the other P4 and is understandably concerned. If there was an appropriate and discreet inquiry you might make as to the status of US thinking generally (e.g., not focused on Vuk specifically but rather are there meetings happening at higher levels with candidates or are they being deferred for some time), that would be helpful to know. If you don’t feel you can appropriately ask, then don’t. :)

Any suggestions regardless would be welcomed! Vuk will be in DC next Thursday/Friday and we’re also setting up Hill meetings.

J

—


On 5/3/16, 10:01 AM, "Pomper, Stephen E. EOP/NSC"
<Stephen_E_Pomper@nsc.eop.gov<mailto:Stephen_E_Pomper@nsc.eop.gov>> wrote:

Thanks Jared. I don't have anyone to recommend.

-----Original Message-----
From: Jared Genser [mailto:jgenser@perseus-strategies.com]
Sent: Tuesday, May 3, 2016 10:00 AM
To: Pomper, Stephen E. EOP/NSC <Stephen_E_Pomper@nsc.eop.gov<mailto:Stephen_E_Pomper@nsc.eop.gov>>
Subject: Re: Request for Meeting with Vuk Jeremić, Candidate for UN
Secretary-General, on Thursday/Friday May 12-13th

Thanks for the reply as always Steve. Is there someone else at the NSC
he should meet?

On May 3, 2016, at 1:02 AM, Pomper, Stephen E. EOP/NSC
<Stephen_E_Pomper@nsc.eop.gov<mailto:Stephen_E_Pomper@nsc.eop.gov>> wrote:
Thanks Jared, but I won't be able to do this. Thanks. Steve
-----Original Message-----
From: Jared Genser [mailto:jgenser@perseus-strategies.com]
Sent: Wednesday, April 30, 2016 5:30 PM
To: Pomper, Stephen E. EOP/NSC
Subject: Request for Meeting with Vuk Jeremić, Candidate for UN
Secretary-General, on Thursday/Friday May 12-13th
Dear Steve,
As you know, Vuk was nominated by Serbia to be one of the nine
candidates for Secretary-General and in that context, he participated in
the candidates dialogue in the UN General Assembly. He was also the
only one of the nine candidates to publish a detailed platform,
attached, which is 81 pages with 53 specific commitments.
Vuk will be in Washington next Thursday and Friday and was hoping to
meet with you to discuss what he put forward.
While I'm sure Vuk won't be the first choice of the United States, I
believe there is much for the US to like in his platform; I hope that
the White House is willing to engage with him on a substantive
discussion of his ideas.
Best,
Jared


[cid:D18791F0-7193-4870-989C-B5A97970CFAB]


Jared Genser

Managing Director

+1.202.466.3069 (o)

+1.202.320.4135 (m)


I’m now tweeting<https://twitter.com/intent/follow?original_referer=https://twitter.com/about/resources/buttons®ion=follow_link&screen_name=JaredGenser&tw_p=follo>!


The UN Security Council in the Age of Human Rights

Cambridge University Press, 2014

Co-Edited by Jared Genser and Bruno Stagno Ugarte


[unknown.png]<http://www.cambridge.org/us/academic/subjects/law/public-international-law/united-nations-security-council-in-age-human-rights?format=HB?format=HB>


For decades the UN Security Council skirted human rights, addressing them sporadically, reluctantly, and typically without reference to binding standards. That began to change with the end of the Cold War, as easing political tensions allowed the Council gradually to act on the fact that upholding the norms against atrocities is intimately connected to its classic mandate of defending international peace and security. Yet even since then, that evolution has been contested, particularly when the Council’s permanent five members fear the topic might come back to haunt them or their close allies. This exceptional volume of essays provides a comprehensive assessment of the Council’s conflicting views on human rights with more nuance, sophistication, and historical memory than anything else around. It helps us to understand how the shifting battles over human rights are being waged in the Council and provides guidance as to how the Council can more effectively defend our rights in the future.


Kenneth Roth, Executive Director, Human Rights Watch


During the last 20 years, the UN Security Council has embraced the protection of individual rights as a matter of international peace and security. That said, progress has been uneven and there have been both great strides forward and terrible setbacks. This timely and important book provides the first comprehensive assessment about how the Security Council works to address major human-rights challenges around the world and recommends ways it can do so more effectively.


Luis Moreno Ocampo, First Prosecutor, International Criminal Court (2003-2012)


The information contained in this email may be confidential and/or legally privileged. It has been sent for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). If the reader of this message is not an intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any unauthorized review, use, disclosure, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this communication, or any of its contents, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please reply to the sender and destroy all copies of the message