EMAIL DETAILS

Hunter and Eric,

I spoke with George. We recommend accepting Burnham's changes but adding back in the following sentence, which Burnham had stricken: "Notwithstanding the foregoing, should any Rosemont Party receive a press inquiry, nothing herein shall prohibit the Rosemont Party from providing truthful factual information in response to such inquiry." Arguably, the sentence is unnecessary in light of the stricken confidentiality provision, but we are concerned the non-disparagement clause might be too broad without it.

We will send Burnham the attached redline, but let them know that we are still waiting on client approval.

Thanks,
Jane

Jane E. Maschka
Partner
jane.maschka@FaegreBD.com<mailto:jane.maschka@FaegreBD.com> Download vCard<http://www.faegrebd.com/vcard/jane.maschka.vcf>
D: +1 612 766 7559

Faegre Baker Daniels LLP<http://www.FaegreBD.com>
2200 Wells Fargo Center | 90 South Seventh Street | Minneapolis, MN 55402-3901, USA

This message and any attachments are for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and/or privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of the original message and any attachments. Thank you