EMAIL DETAILS
SUBJECT:
The Defective Constitution....
PRI: NORMAL
FROM:
E
eschwerin@rosemontseneca.com
DATE:
2010-05-11 02:32:59
MSG_ID:
<AANLkTikWjLxia1TLnqm_Y_ybdT-LVJiadvWcjMGziKnw@mail.gmail.com>
RECIPIENTS:
TO:
H
Hunter Biden
<hbiden@rosemontseneca.com>
S
David Schwerin
<schwerin@verizon.net>
CONTENT:
TEXT: YES |
HTML: YES
PROCESSED
*From NBC's Ali Weinberg* Several liberal blogs (as well as at least one conservative) have condemned a memo from the RNC alleging that *Solicitor General* *Elena Kagan's* use of a particular quote from *Justice Thurgood Marshall,* for whom she clerked, demonstrates her disdain for the constitution. In an article published shortly after Marshall's death, Kagan quoted from a 1987 speech in which he said the Constitution as originally conceived and drafted, essentially condoning slavery, was "defective," and that the Supreme Court's mission was "to show a special solicitude for the despised and the disadvantaged." The RNC's memo includes a headline reading "Does Kagan still view Constitution 'As Originally Drafted And Conceived’ As ‘Defective’?” At the conservative blog NRO, Abigail Thernstrom <http://corner.nationalreview.com/post/?q=MDgzOWJmZjE2MzFkMTFhNDNmYTMyZGMxNzdkNjdmYjU=>has some advice for RNC Chairman *Michael Steele:* "just as a little experiment, you might try thinking before you speak." Citing the RNC memo's question, whether Kagan "still" believes the Constitution as originally drafted is defective, Thernstrom writes, "Of course the answer should be, yes. Might the Three-Fifths Clause have been a wee bit of a defect?" AMERICAblog's <http://www.americablog.com/2010/05/gop-attacks-kagan-by-defending-slavery.html>reaction: "Is it racism or rank stupidity that motivates Republicans nowadays? But attacking Thurgood Marshall? Why, because he's black? Oh, I know, everyone officially will say "no, it's not that." But really? And the specific Marshall quote that the GOP is so upset about - that the Constitution was defective as originally drafted. Thurgood Marshall was talking about, among things, slavery. So, the Republicans don't think approving slavery was a defect of the Constitution? That's really their argument, defending three-fifths a man and slavery?" And Daily Kos:<http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2010/5/10/865193/-GOP-Defends-Slavery-to-Attack-Kagan?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+dailykos%2Findex+%28Daily+Kos%29&utm_content=Google+Reader> "It certainly wouldn't be a new tactic from Republicans. Don't forget *Ronald Reagan's* first speech after the 1980 GOP convention was on the topic of states rights, and was delievered in Philadelphia, Mississippi, where three civil rights workers were murdered in 1964. The GOP hasn't changed an iota in the intervening thirty years, except perhaps they're even less subtle in their racism in 2010." -- Eric D. Schwerin Rosemont Seneca Partners (202) 333-1880 eschwerin@rosemontseneca.co
METADATA:
THREAD:
INDEX:
AdhhoyclNTkv+6MiTI6hIjwnsm5DAQ==