EMAIL DETAILS
SUBJECT:
Re: FW: Privileged and Confidential
PRI: NORMAL
FROM:
V
v.pozharskyi.ukraine@gmail.com
DATE:
2014-06-25 08:05:44
MSG_ID:
<CAHHQ8gBDHjk_Lah=3yHaAohSNxPcfoF9NdQjxqeLXac=1UZ+kQ@mail.gmail.com>
RECIPIENTS:
TO:
H
Heather King
<hking@bsfllp.com>
CC:
A
alan.apter@burisma.com
D
darcher@rosemontseneca.com
H
hbiden@rosemontseneca.com
CONTENT:
TEXT: YES |
HTML: YES
PROCESSED
ok, Thanks 2014-06-24 22:56 GMT+03:00 Heather King <hking@bsfllp.com>: > Vadim – I think that Hunter and Devon may have opinions on this still, > but here are my thoughts: > > 1. In general, I stand by my previous advice that you do not > promote or advertise your board meetings. It’s not expected and so there is > nothing negative (it doesn’t look like you are ashamed or concealing > anything – I don’t understand why you and Nikolai have that impression). > > 2. If you put just this statement up on your website it will look > odd not only because no one expects you to advertise board meetings and > because so much time has passed since you had it. > > 3. That said, if your Board and Nikolai feel strongly about putting > something on the website, the statement you drafted basically seems to > serve the same purpose as an earnings release so it is fine. > > > > *Heather King, Esq.* > > *Partner* > > > *BOIES, SCHILLER & FLEXNER LLP **5301 Wisconsin Avenue, N.W.* > *Washington, D.C. 20015* > > *202-274-1129 <202-274-1129> (Phone) 202-237-6131 <202-237-6131> (Fax)* > > *hking@bsfllp.com <hking@bsfllp.com>* > > > > *From:* Vadim Pozharskyi [mailto:v.pozharskyi.ukraine@gmail.com] > *Sent:* Tuesday, June 24, 2014 3:50 AM > *To:* Heather King; Hunter Biden; Devon Archer > *Subject:* Privileged and Confidential > > > > Dear all, > > Going back to the issue of announcing our Board meeting and our subsequent > discussions, I also brought it up it talking to Nikolay and here are our > thoughts: > > Of course, from the very beginning we planned to make a decent press > release, place some photos on the website and make some PR coverage. > > However, following your persistent recommendations, we agreed not to > follow through with that, totally understanding all possible undesired > political and PR implications that could have arisen. > > But still Nikolay and I are of opinion that at least a short corporate > message should be put on the website stating that we did have this meeting. > Otherwise, in a way we're making an impression that our company is ashamed > of it and is deliberately concealing this information. > > In this regard, please find attached a short version of the corporate > message drafted by the FTI team a few weeks ago. > > Best, > > Vadim > > ------------------------------ > The information contained in this electronic message is confidential > information intended only for the use of the named recipient(s) and may > contain information that, among other protections, is the subject of > attorney-client privilege, attorney work product or exempt from disclosure > under applicable law. If the reader of this electronic message is not the > named recipient, or the employee or agent responsible to deliver it to the > named recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, > distribution, copying or other use of this communication is strictly > prohibited and no privilege is waived. If you have received this > communication in error, please immediately notify the sender by replying to > this electronic message and then deleting this electronic message from your > computer. [v.1]
METADATA:
THREAD:
INDEX:
AdhhpENCdmXaMuA5SbWR2qIGMus5mw==
REFERENCES:
REPLY_TO:
<0CB8E663099EB942AE17613795EEE5949BA6597C39@wasexch04>
REFS:
<0CB8E663099EB942AE17613795EEE5949BA6597C39@wasexch04>
<CAHHQ8gCjivqgzp=4v8-9YQRc13itD2=WmfnCdHEN_dkMMmcKtw@mail.gmail.com>