EMAIL DETAILS
SUBJECT:
Mtg with Schneiderman
PRI: NORMAL
FROM:
S
smacklera@gmail.com
DATE:
2011-06-16 13:40:13
MSG_ID:
<BANLkTimjNPs4Et9xTjnT4yE+cRu7piS5oQ@mail.gmail.com>
RECIPIENTS:
TO:
2
BB
<261penn@gmail.com>
H
Hunter Biden
<hbiden@rosemontseneca.com>
T
ted kaufman
<tedkaufman@comcast.net>
CONTENT:
TEXT: YES |
HTML: YES
PROCESSED
Beau, For my money, after the important legal discussion you and ES will have today, there are two political/press points to hit: 1) Agree to continue to work together, and do the press arm together (letting his team carry the load, since they seem much more willing to put their boss' name in the press, and they're pros at it). This week was a great first step, let's see if we can build on it. publicly. DE and NY are natural partners on financial issues, that should be to our benefit (this is much different than you partnering with Miller or Cortez-Masto, for example). 2) Establish at least a preliminary timeline, if not explicit agreement, on when and how you two will formally break from the discussions with the banks. Is it done implicitly, by the two of you establishing an actual case against a bank (or more)? Or, for example, is it done explicitly, by writing a letter to Miller and Perrelli saying DE and NY are formally pulling out of the negotiations (which would effectively scuttle any deal). I have not spoken to Ted about this, so I reserve the right to be wrong or have forgotten something. Have a good day up there. -- Alexander Snyder-Mackler (302) 598-867
METADATA:
THREAD:
INDEX:
AdhhpE1LLQorZO0PQsOGn0h0+29qwQ==