And now the analysis goes the other way.....

SUBJECT:

PRI: NORMAL

FROM:

E

eschwerin@rosemontseneca.com

DATE:

2015-10-15 17:46:59

MSG_ID:

<7146E98F-120E-4C4D-AEAE-1728DD698287@rosemontseneca.com>

RECIPIENTS:

TO:

H

Hunter Biden <hbiden@rosemontseneca.com>

S

Alexander S. Mackler <smacklera@gmail.com>

CONTENT: TEXT: YES | HTML: YES

PROCESSED

Sanders Could Get Big Debate Bounce <http://politicalwire.com/2015/10/15/sanders-could-get-big-debate-bounce/>
October 15, 2015By Taegan Goddard <http://politicalwire.com/author/tdg/>5 Comments <http://politicalwire.com/2015/10/15/sanders-could-get-big-debate-bounce/#disqus_thread>
The Atlantic <http://www.nationaljournal.com/s/90218/why-bernie-did-better-than-pundits-thought> says “don’t be surprised if it’s Bernie Sanders who benefits just as much as Clinton from his performance at the Democratic debate—and possible even more. For an insurgent like the Vermont senator, these initial contests are the first real chance to introduce himself to the country, and judging from the Democratic debate record of 15.3 million people who tuned in to CNN, there was a lot of interest in seeing Sanders take on Clinton.”

“While pundits declared Clinton the winner, television focus groups and initial online polls went decisively for Sanders. Those are admittedly a wholly non-scientific pair of metrics, but the results got the attention of former advisers to President Obama, who said they saw the same dynamic play out during the debates eight years ago.”


Eric D. Schwerin
Rosemont Seneca Advisors, LLC
1010 Wisconsin Ave., NW
Suite 705
Washington, DC 20007
(202) 333-1880
eschwerin@rosemontseneca.com <x-msg://59/eschwerin@obblaw.com>
P Consider the environment before printing this email.

METADATA:

THREAD:

INDEX: AdhhpGnjqZKo6odgR0etOe7Uhj2QSA==

EMAIL DETAILS