EMAIL DETAILS
SUBJECT:
FW: Biden filings
PRI: NORMAL
FROM:
S
smancinelli@ainbanklaw.com
DATE:
2017-03-03 16:39:06
MSG_ID:
<05C361CDDCDC5C4281D64FB1EA4B86B7A33910E7@SMCAEX01.smcalaw.com>
RECIPIENTS:
TO:
E
eschwerin@rosemontseneca.com
H
hbiden@rosemontseneca.com
CONTENT:
TEXT: YES |
HTML: YES
PROCESSED
I would like the Press Person’s view of how to respond to this. Our opposition to the Motion is not due until next Thursday. But at mediation, we agreed at mediation to put litigation on hold at mediation and therefore our opposition to the motion. So that is why no response has been filed. From: Julia Marsh [mailto:jmarsh@nypost.com] Sent: Friday, March 03, 2017 11:33 AM To: SMancinelli Subject: Biden filings Hello Sarah, Reaching out to see when you plan on filing the response to the asset injunction motion. I also wanted to give you the opportunity to respond further to any of the allegations that Mrs. Biden is making in the divorce. You can reach me anytime on my cell: 917 692 5540 -- JULIA MARSH Manhattan Supreme Court Correspondent, New York Post 1211 AVENUE OF THE AMERICAS, NEW YORK, NY 10036 WORK: 212.608.9454<tel:212.930.0000> jmarsh@nypost.com<mailto:jmarsh@nypost.com> nypost.com<http://nypost.com/> [Inline image 3] [https://www.facebook.com/NYPost/]<https://www.facebook.com/NYPost/> [https://twitter.com/nypost?lang=en] <https://twitter.com/nypost?lang=en> [https://plus.google.com/+nypost/videos] <https://plus.google.com/+nypost/videos>
METADATA:
THREAD:
TOPIC:
Biden filings
INDEX:
AQHSlDvTVYjEEqyn7kGJeYAgBiogRaGDT0vQ
REFERENCES:
REPLY_TO:
<CAOn8_X5ddSE3onUynvt_N+G94hPjfO6APYiQhMmxHvPCHw=JuQ@mail.gmail.com>
REFS:
<CAOn8_X5ddSE3onUynvt_N+G94hPjfO6APYiQhMmxHvPCHw=JuQ@mail.gmail.com>